19 research outputs found
A mirror-image analysis of psychiatric hospitalisations among people with severe mental illness using Independent Supported Housing
Background:
Evidence on the effectiveness of Independent Supported Housing (ISH) for non-homeless people with severe mental illness primarily comes from observational cohort studies, which have high risk of bias due to confounding by time-invariant sample characteristics. The present study proposes an alternative study design known from pharmacology to overcome this bias and strengthen evidence.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective mirror-image analysis with medical records of 144 ISH service users to assess the effectiveness of ISH in reducing the number and duration of hospitalisations. Outcomes occurring in equal periods before and during ISH utilisation were compared for every ISH user. Differences between the periods were tested with incidence rate ratios (IRR).
Results:
Included service users were on average 38.2 years old, female (54%) and predominately had an affective (28.5%) or a schizophrenic or psychotic (22.9%) disorder with ISH utilisation days ranging from 36–960. Fewer admissions (IRR = 0.41, 95%-CI 0.27–0.64) and fewer person-days hospitalised (IRR = 0.38, 95%-CI 0.35–0.41) were observed during ISH utilisation compared to prior to their ISH utilisation. While the reduction in psychiatric admissions may be somewhat confounded by time-variant characteristics, the substantial reduction in hospitalised bed-bays represents at least partially an intervention effect.
Conclusions:
The mirror-image study design allowed for a cost-effective investigation of ISH effectiveness in reducing hospitalisation without confounding by time-invariant sample characteristics. We provide recommendations for the design’s application and suggest further research with larger samples
Epidemisches Versagen: Warum Staaten und internationale Organisationen wiederholt bei der Bekämpfung von Epidemien scheitern
Warum haben Staaten und internationale Organisationen wiederholt bei der Epidemiebekämpfung versagt? Wir analysieren das Vorgehen währen der Ebolaepidemie und der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie. In beiden Fällen erfolgte die Reaktion im Rahmen eines Zyklus epidemischen Versagens (ZEV) mit folgenden Phasen: Vernachlässigung, Arroganz/Leugnung, Panik und Analyse/Selbstkritik. Zentrale Ursachen für den ZEV sind die Ökologie (v.a. die Vernachlässigung von Zoonosen), die Politik (v.a. negative Anreize bei der Epidemiebekämpfung), sozio-ökonomische Kontexte, die menschliche Psychologie (v.a. kognitive Verzerrungen) sowie erkenntnistheoretische Probleme (v.a. der Rückgriff auf die Erfahrungen früherer Epidemien)
Post-viral mental health sequelae in infected persons associated with COVID-19 and previous epidemics and pandemics: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence estimates
Aims: Post-viral mental health problems (MHP) in COVID-19 patients and survivors were anticipated already during early stages of this pandemic. We aimed to synthesize the prevalence of the anxiety, depression, post-traumatic and general distress domain associated with virus epidemics since 2002.
Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase from 2002 to April 14, 2021 for peer-reviewed studies reporting prevalence of MHP in adults with laboratory confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-1, H1N1, MERS-CoV, H7N9, Ebolavirus, or SARS-CoV-2 infection. We included studies that assessed post-viral MHP with validated and frequently used scales. A three-level random-effects meta-analysis for dependent effect sizes was conducted to account for multiple outcome reporting. We pooled MHP across all domains and separately by severity (above mild or moderate-to-severe) and by acute (one month), ongoing (one to three months), and post-illness stages (longer than three months). A meta-regression was conducted to test for moderating effects, particularly for exploring esti-
mate differences between SARS-Cov-2 and previous pandemics and epidemics. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020194535.
Results: We identified 59 studies including between 14 and 1002 participants and providing 187 prevalence estimates. MHP, in general, decreased from acute to post-illness from 46.3% to 38.8% and for mild and moderate-to-severe from 22.3% to 18.8%, respectively. We found no evidence of moderating effects except for non-random sampling and H1N1 showing higher prevalence. There was a non-significant trend towards lower MHP for SARS-CoV-2 compared to previous epidemics.
Conclusions: MHP prevalence estimates decreased over time but were still on a substantial level at post-illness. Post-viral mental health problems caused by SARS-CoV-2 could have been expected much earlier, given the previous post-viral sequelae
Prevalence of Mental Health Problems During Virus Epidemics in the General Public, Health Care Workers and Survivors: A Rapid Review of the Evidence
Background: The swift spread of SARS-CoV-2 provides a challenge worldwide. As a consequence of restrictive public health measures like isolation, quarantine, and community containment, the provision of mental health services is a major challenge. Evidence from past virus epidemics and the current SARS-CoV-2 outbreak indicate high prevalence rates of mental health problems (MHP) as short- and long-term consequences. However, a broader picture of MHP among different populations is still lacking.
Methods: We conducted a rapid review on MHP prevalence rates published since 2000, during and after epidemics, including the general public, health care workers, and survivors. Any quantitative articles reporting on MHP rates were included. Out of 2,855 articles screened, a total of 74 were included in this review.
Results: Most original studies on MHP were conducted in China in the context of SARS-CoV-1, and reported on anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms/disorder, general psychiatric morbidity, and psychological symptoms. The MHP rates across studies, populations, and epidemics vary substantially. While some studies show high and persistent rates of MHP in populations directly affected by isolation, quarantine, threat of infection, infection, or life-threatening symptoms (e.g., health care workers), other studies report minor effects. Furthermore, even less affected populations (e.g., distant to epidemic epicenter, no contact history with suspected or confirmed cases) can show high rates of MHP.
Discussion: MHP vary largely across countries and risk-groups in reviewed studies. The results call attention to potentially high MHP during epidemics. Individuals affected directly by an epidemic might be at a higher risk of short or even long-term mental health impairments. This study delivers insights stemming from a wide range of psychiatric instruments and questionnaires. The results call for the use of validated and standardized instruments, reference norms, and pre-post measurements to better understand the magnitude of the MHP during and after the epidemics. Nevertheless, emerging MHP should be considered during epidemics including the provision of access to mental health care to mitigate potential mental impairments
Physical fitness and modifiable cardiovascular disease risk factors in survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the SURfit study
Background: Childhood cancer survivors are at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) because of intensive cancer therapies often accompanied by an unhealthy lifestyle. This study was aimed at 1) describing modifiable CVD risk factors in survivors and 2) investigating the association between different aspects of physical fitness and CVD risk factors.
Methods: The authors analyzed cross-sectional data from ≥5-year survivors who were 16 years old or younger at their cancer diagnosis and 16 years old or older at the time of the study. Single CVD risk factors (waist circumference, blood pressure, fasting glucose, inverse high-density lipoprotein, and triglycerides), a composite CVD risk score (combined z scores of all CVD risk factors), and metabolic syndrome were evaluated. Physical fitness measures included cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), a handgrip test, and a 1-minute sit-to-stand test (STS). Multivariable logistic regression was used for the association between fitness measures and CVD risk factors, with adjustments made for demographic factors and cancer therapy.
Results: This study included 163 survivors with a median age at diagnosis of 7 years and a median age at the time of the study of 28 years. Among those survivors, 27% had a high waist circumference, 32% had high blood pressure, 19% had high triglycerides, 20% had an increased composite CVD risk score, and 10% had metabolic syndrome. A better performance during CPET, handgrip testing, and STS was associated with a lower probability of having a high waist circumference, high triglycerides, and metabolic syndrome.
Conclusions: Better aerobic fitness (CPET) and, to a lesser extent, handgrip and STS were associated with fewer CVD risk factors. Further investigations are warranted to investigate which fitness measures should preferably be used to screen survivors to promote physical activity in those with impaired test performance.
Lay summary: This study investigated the relationship between physical fitness of adult childhood cancer survivors and their risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular risk factors such as high blood pressure, a high waist circumference, and high blood lipids were frequently found in childhood cancer survivors. Survivors with better physical fitness (measured by a cycling test or simple strength and endurance tests) had a lower chance of having cardiovascular risk factors. This suggests that childhood cancer survivors could benefit from physical activity and general fitness by increasing their physical fitness and possibly decreasing their risk of cardiovascular disease.
Keywords: cardiovascular disease; childhood cancer survivors; exercise test; metabolic syndrome; physical fitness