The Genetic Basis of the First Patient with Wiedemann–Rautenstrauch Syndrome in the Russian Federation

Bi-allelic pathogenic variations within POLR3A have been associated with a spectrum of hereditary disorders. Among these, a less frequently observed condition is Wiedemann–Rautenstrauch syndrome (WRS), also known as neonatal progeroid syndrome. This syndrome typically manifests neonatally and is characterized by growth retardation, evident generalized lipodystrophy with distinctively localized fat accumulations, sparse scalp hair, and atypical facial features. Our objective was to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms of Wiedemann–Rautenstrauch syndrome (WRS). In this study, we present a clinical case of a 7-year-old female patient diagnosed with WRS. Utilizing whole-exome sequencing (WES), we identified a novel missense variant c.3677T>C (p.Leu1226Pro) in the POLR3A gene (NM_007055.4) alongside two cis intronic variants c.1909+22G>A and c.3337-11T>C. Via the analysis of mRNA derived from fibroblasts, we reconfirmed the splicing-affecting nature of the c.3337-11T>C variant. Furthermore, our investigation led to the reclassification of the c.3677T>C (p.Leu1226Pro) variant as a likely pathogenic variant. Therefore, this is the first case demonstrating the molecular genetics of a patient with Wiedemann–Rautenstrauch syndrome from the Russian Federation. A limited number of clinical cases have been documented until this moment; therefore, broadening the linkage between phenotype and molecular changes in the POLR3A gene will significantly contribute to the comprehensive understanding of the molecular basis of POLR3A-related disorders

Diagnostic value of islet autoantibody assays practised in Russia. 1. Classic immunofluorescence islet cell antibody assay, immunoradiometric glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody assay, and ELISA tyrosine phosphatase antibody and insulin antibody assays

Objective. To estimate performance characteristics and diagnostic value of immunofluorescent islet cell antibody (ICA) assay, immunoradiometric glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody (GADA) assay, and ELISA tyrosine phosphatase IA-2 antibody (IA-2A) and insulin antibody (IA) assays. Research Design and Methods. Antibodies were tested in 438 children and adolescents with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (DM) type 1, and in 891 subjects without DM type 1. ICA were determined by the classic indirect immunofluorescent method recommended by the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation International, GADA were determined with the Immunotech IRMA Anti-GAD kit, and IA-2A and IA were determined with Medizym Anti-IA2 and Orgentec Anti-Insulin ELISA kits, respectively. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the tests were estimated with contingency tables. Diagnostic accuracy was estimated from areas under receiver operating curves (AUC). Results. ICA test was of the greatest diagnostic value (Se=88%, Sp=96%, PPV=96%, NPV=94%, AUC=0,94), followed by IA-2A (Se=66%, Sp=98%, PPV=98%, NPV=59%, AUC=0,82) and GADA (Se=73%, Sp=84%, PPV=75%, NPV=83%, AUC=0,79). IA test exhibited a very low Se (4,3%) and lacked diagnostic accuracy (AUC=0,5). Conclusions. We recommend to use ICA, IA-2A and GADA tests surveyed in our study for diagnosis of DM type 1 and differential diagnosis of DM. We don’t recommend IA testing with an Orgentec Anti-Insulin ELISA kit for usage in clinical practice