Association between limb alignment and patient-reported outcomes after total knee arthroplasty using an implant that reproduces anatomical geometry

Abstract Background A kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is expected to improve patient satisfaction, but its effect remains controversial. We investigated differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between KA and non-KA TKAs using an implant that reproduces anatomical geometry. Methods TKAs for varus deformity were performed in consecutive 129 patients (149 knees) via a measured resection technique with conventional instruments. The femorotibial angle (FTA), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), and the angle between the joint line and the line perpendicular to the mechanical axis (AJLMA) were measured postoperatively (mean 13.6 months), and an AJLMA of ≥ 2° was defined as kinematic alignment. Patients were assigned to two or three alignment categories in each measurement method, and the Knee Society Scores (KSS) and Japanese Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (J-KOOS) was compared among the groups. Results For patients assessed by FTA, an ADL-related J-KOOS subscale (J-KOOS-A) showed a significant difference between valgus and varus outliers (p < 0.05). When assessed by HKAA, neither the KSS nor J-KOOS subscales were significantly different among groups. When assessed by AJLMA, J-KOOS-A was significantly different between groups, and a group for AJLMA of ≥ 2° had higher scores than a group for AJLMA of < 2° (95% CI 0.323–7.763; p < 0.05). Conclusions Patients with an AJLMA of ≥ 2° reported significantly higher patient’s satisfaction regarding ADL. This suggests the importance of restoration of the physiological joint line which can be achieved via KA TKAs

The impact of postoperative inclination of the joint line on clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty using a prosthesis with anatomical geometry

Abstract The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of postoperative inclination of the joint line on clinical results after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a prosthesis with anatomical geometry. This study included 145 primary cruciate-retaining type of knee prosthesis with anatomical geometry. Three years postoperatively, clinical outcomes including the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were recorded. Limb alignment was evaluated by the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) axis and inclination of the joint line was assessed by the joint line orientation angle (JLOA). Knees were divided into two groups according to the HKA: in-range (− 3 to 3°) and outlier group ( 3°) or the JLOA: in-range (2–4°) and outlier group ( 4°), and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Postoperative Knee Society Function Score (KS-FS) was significantly higher in the HKA in-range group than the outlier group (p = 0.01). The Knee Society Knee Score and all subscales of the Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were comparable between the groups. A multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between age at operation and postoperative KS-FS > of 80 points. Neither HKA in-range nor JLOA in-range were associated with the higher knee function. In conclusion, TKA-postoperative inclination of the joint line was not relevant to the short-term PROs. Treatment strategies that attempt to make joint line inclination in order to improve postoperative PROs should be avoided, and alignment goals such as kinematic alignment should be considered carefully

Surgical treatment for dropped head syndrome with cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: a case report

Abstract Background Dropped head syndrome (DHS) is a flexion deformity of the neck that is caused by severe weakness of the neck extensor muscles. DHS occurs in combination with not only neuromuscular disorders, but also cervical spondylosis. However, there are few reports of DHS complicated by cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (CSA). Here we report a case of DHS with CSA in a patient who underwent surgical treatment. Case presentation A 79-year-old man became aware of dropped head and gait disturbance in addition to the paralysis of his right upper extremity. At his initial visit, he had a severe chin-on-chest posture. Neurological examination revealed severe paralysis of deltoid, biceps, wrist extensor, finger flexor, extensor, and abductors, in addition to lower extremity spasticity. Nevertheless, sensory dysfunction was not observed. X-ray images showed severe kyphosis at the upper thoracic level. MRI and CT myelography findings revealed spinal canal stenosis at the level of C5–6 and C6 root compression of the right side. Motor neuron disease was excluded because of findings from electromyography. Therefore, we diagnosed this patient as having DHS with cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. A C2–Th5 posterior fusion with C3–C6 laminoplasty and C5–6 foraminotomy on the right side were performed. After surgery, the complaint of dropped head was improved significantly and bilaterally finger motion was improved slightly. His neck position was maintained at the final follow-up at about 1 year after surgery. Conclusions Despite the limitation of short-term follow-up, favorable results for the DHS were maintained in the present case. Surgical treatment for similar cases may be a feasible option, but surgery does have some complications

Unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression improves low back pain while standing equally on both sides in patients with lumbar canal stenosis: analysis using a detailed visual analogue scale

Abstract Background Unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a less invasive technique compared to conventional laminectomy. Recently, several authors have reported favorable results of low back pain (LBP) in patients of LSS treated with ULBD. However, the detailed changes and localization of LBP before and after ULBD for LSS remain unclear. Furthermore, unsymmetrical invasion to para-spinal muscle and facet joint may result in the residual unsymmetrical symptoms. To clarify these points, we conducted an observational study and used detailed visual analog scale (VAS) scores to evaluate the characteristics and bilateral changes of LBP and lower extremity symptoms. Methods We included 50 patients with LSS treated with ULBD. A detailed visual analogue scale (VAS; 100 mm) score of LBP in three different postural positions: motion, standing, and sitting, and bilateral VAS score (approached side versus opposite side) of LBP, lower extremity pain (LEP), and lower extremity numbness (LEN) were measured. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used to quantify the clinical improvement. Results Detailed LBP VAS score before surgery was 51.5 ± 32.5 in motion, 63.0 ± 30.1 while standing, and 37.8 ± 31.8 while sitting; and showed LBP while standing was significantly greater than LBP while sitting (p < 0.01). After surgery, LBP while standing was significantly improved relative to that while sitting (p < 0.05), and levels of LBP in the three postures became almost the same with ODI improvement. Bilateral VAS scores showed significant improvement equally on both sides (p < 0.01). Conclusions ULBD improves LBP while standing equally on both sides in patients with LCS. The improvement of LBP by the ULBD surgery suggests radicular LBP improved because of decompression surgery. Furthermore, the symmetric improvement of LBP by the ULBD surgery suggests unsymmetrical invasion of the paraspinal muscles and facet joints is unrelated to residual LBP

Surgical Treatment for Spinal Tuberculosis without Elevation of Inflammatory Biomarkers at the Initial Visit Mimicking Spinal Metastasis

Here, we report a case of spinal tuberculosis without elevation of C-reactive protein (CRP) at the initial visit mimicking spinal metastasis. A 70-year-old woman developed progressive paraplegia without a history of injury and came to our hospital for evaluation. Severe compression to the spinal cord with osteolytic destruction of the spinal vertebrae at T6-7 was observed without elevation of CRP. A T4-9 posterior decompression and fusion were performed. Although the pathology revealed no malignant tumor cells, a positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) showed upregulation of the thyroid gland and aspiration cytology revealed a thyroid carcinoma. Thus, we diagnosed her with spinal metastases from thyroid carcinoma. Conservative treatment was chosen with the hope of a significant neurologic recovery; however, 9 months after the primary surgery, she returned to our hospital with reprogressive paraplegia. In addition to progression of osteolytic changes to the T5-7 vertebrae, a coin lesion on the right side of the lung and elevation of CRP were observed. Finally, we diagnosed her with spinal tuberculosis based on the results of a CT-guided needle culture. Two-stage surgeries (posterior and anterior) were performed in addition to administering antituberculosis medications. At the 1-year postoperative follow-up evaluation, both neurologic function and laboratory data were improved with T5-9 complete fusion. It is difficult to determine based on imaging findings alone whether osteolytic vertebrae represent spinal metastases or tuberculosis. Even though inflammatory biomarkers, such as CRP, were not elevated, we should consider the possibility of not only spinal metastases but also tuberculosis when planning surgery involving osteolytic vertebrae. In addition, the combination of neurological, imaging, and pathological findings is important for the diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis