159 research outputs found

    N-(2,5-Dimeth­oxy­phen­yl)-N′-(4-hy­droxy­pheneth­yl)urea

    Get PDF
    In the title compound, C17H20N2O4, the 2,5-dimeth­oxy­phenyl unit is almost planar, with an r.m.s. deviation of 0.015 Å. The dihedral angle between the 2,5-dimeth­oxy­phenyl ring and the urea plane is 20.95 (8)°. The H atoms of the urea NH groups are positioned syn to each other. The mol­ecular structure is stabilized by a short intra­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bond. In the crystal, inter­molecular N—H⋯O and O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules into a three-dimensional network

    1-[3-(Hy­droxy­meth­yl)phen­yl]-3-phenyl­urea

    Get PDF
    In the title compound, C14H14N2O2, the dihedral angle between the benzene rings is 23.6 (1)°. The H atoms of the urea NH groups are positioned syn to each other. In the crystal, inter­molecular N—H⋯O and O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules into a three-dimensional network

    Predictive Solution for Radiation Toxicity Based on Big Data

    Get PDF
    Radiotherapy is a treatment method using radiation for cancer treatment based on a patient treatment planning for each radiotherapy machine. At this time, the dose, volume, device setting information, complication, tumor control probability, etc. are considered as a single-patient treatment for each fraction during radiotherapy process. Thus, these filed-up big data for a long time and numerous patients’ cases are inevitably suitable to produce optimal treatment and minimize the radiation toxicity and complication. Thus, we are going to handle up prostate, lung, head, and neck cancer cases using machine learning algorithm in radiation oncology. And, the promising algorithms as the support vector machine, decision tree, and neural network, etc. will be introduced in machine learning. In conclusion, we explain a predictive solution of radiation toxicity based on the big data as treatment planning decision support system

    Poly[(μ6-6-oxidopyridinium-2-carboxyl­ato)caesium]

    Get PDF
    The asymmetric unit of the polymeric title salt, [Cs(C6H4NO3)]n, comprises a Cs+ cation and a 6-oxidopyridinium-2-carboxyl­ate anion. The Cs+ cation is six-coordinated by O atoms derived from two oxido and four carboxyl­ate O atoms; each O atom in the anion bridges two Cs+ cations. In the crystal, inter­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bonding is present and contributes to the stability of the three-dimensional network generated by the bridging O atoms

    Prediction of Cancer Patient Outcomes Based on Artificial Intelligence

    Get PDF
    Knowledge-based outcome predictions are common before radiotherapy. Because there are various treatment techniques, numerous factors must be considered in predicting cancer patient outcomes. As expectations surrounding personalized radiotherapy using complex data have increased, studies on outcome predictions using artificial intelligence have also increased. Representative artificial intelligence techniques used to predict the outcomes of cancer patients in the field of radiation oncology include collecting and processing big data, text mining of clinical literature, and machine learning for implementing prediction models. Here, methods of data preparation and model construction to predict rates of survival and toxicity using artificial intelligence are described

    Non-Invasive Follow-up Evaluation of Post-Embolized AVM with Time-Resolved MRA: A Case Report

    Get PDF
    We report the hemodynamic assessment in a patient with cerebral arteriovenous malformation using time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography (TR-MRA), a non-invasive modality, and catheter-based digital subtraction angiography (DSA), before and after embolization. Comparison of the results showed that TR-MRA produced very fast dynamic images and the findings closely matched those obtained at DSA. For initial work-up and follow-up studies in patients with vascular lesions, TR-MRA and DSA are therefore comparable

    Sleeve Lobectomy as an Alternative Procedure to Pneumonectomy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

    Get PDF
    IntroductionThe aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of sleeve lobectomy (SL) and pneumonectomy (PN) and to determine which one is more acceptable standard procedure for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.MethodsFrom 1996 to 2005, 424 patients underwent SL (n = 157) and PN (n = 267) in our institution. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare these two groups for mortality, morbidity, survival, recurrence, and postoperative pulmonary function.ResultsIn each group, 105 patients were eligible for analysis. The operative mortality was lower in the SL group (1.0%) than the PN group (8.6%), (p < 0.0001). The morbidity was similar (33.4% versus 29.5%, p = 0.376). The 5-year survival was lower in the PN group (PN, 32.14% versus SL, 58.43%, p = 0.0002). The recurrence pattern (locoregional versus distant) did not differ between two groups (p = 0.180). The mean actual postoperative first second forced expiratory volume in the patients underwent SL was 2.05 ± 0.55 liter, which increased by 7.9% compared with the predicted-postoperative first second forced expiratory volume.ConclusionsOur results showed that the SL can be performed with low operative risk and may offer superior survival and better postoperative pulmonary function compared with the PN in selected patients. If anatomically feasible, a SL must be considered as a favorable alternative to PN in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

    1-(3-Hy­droxy­phen­yl)-3-(3-meth­oxy­phenyl)thio­urea

    Get PDF
    In the title compound, C14H14N2O2S, the dihedral angles between the thio­urea group and the methoxyphenyl and hydroxyphenyl rings are 61.91 (4) and 76.90 (4)°, respectively. The benzene rings are twisted with respect to each other, making a dihedral angle of 71.03 (4)°. The H atoms of the thio­urea NH groups are positioned anti to each other. In the crystal, inter­molecular N—H⋯S, N—H⋯O and O—H⋯S hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules into a three-dimensional network

    1-(2-Hy­droxy-2-phenyl­eth­yl)-3-(4-meth­oxy­phen­yl)urea

    Get PDF
    In the title compound, C16H18N2O3, the dihedral angle between the 4-meth­oxy­phenyl ring and the urea group is 35.6 (2) °. The H atoms of the urea NH groups are positioned syn to each other. In the crystal, inter­molecular N—H⋯O and O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules into a two-dimensional array in the ac plane; the carbonyl-O atom is trifurcated
    corecore