Oculomotor Nerve Palsy in a Patient with a Ruptured Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysm

We describe a case of acute oculomotor nerve palsy caused by a ruptured middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm. A 59-year-old female presenting with headache and nausea was admitted to our hospital. Her consciousness was alert, and had no other neurological deficit without left oculomotor nerve palsy. A computed tomography (CT) showed SAH extending from left sylvian cistern to basal cistern. CT angiography revealed a left MCA aneurysm which protruded toward internal carotid artery. The patient was successfully treated with surgical clipping. The oculomotor nerve palsy resolved immediately after the surgery. Perioperative radiological evaluation revealed that there were no evidence of midbrain hemorrhage or stroke, vessel anomaly of basilar, posterior cerebral or superior cerebellar artery, vasospasm, and uncal herniation. Furthermore, intraoperative findings revealed that the aneurysm was projected toward the affected carotid cistern and oculomotor nerve. From these findings and time course of oculomotor nerve palsy, it is suggested that the jet flow of bleeding from the ruptured MCA aneurysm caused oculomotor nerve palsy in the patient

Sensitivity of CT perfusion for the diagnosis of cerebral infarction

We aimed to determine the sensitivity of CT perfusion (CTP) for the diagnosis of cerebral infarction in the acute stage. We retrospectively reviewed patients with ischemic stroke who underwent brain CTP on arrival and MRI-diffusion weighted image (DWI) after hospitalization between October 2008 and October 2011. Final diagnosis was made from MRI-DWI findings and 87 patients were identified. Fifty-five out of 87 patients (63%) could be diagnosed with cerebral infarction by initial CTP. The sensitivity depends on the area size (s) : 29% for S<3 cm2, 83% for S≥3 cm2-<6 cm2, 88% for S≥6 cm2-<9 cm2, 80% for S≥9 cm2-<12 cm2, and 96% for S≥12 cm2 (p<0.001). Sensitivity depends on the type of infarction : 0% for lacunar, 74% for atherothrombotic, and 92% for cardioembolism (p<0.001). Sensitivity is not correlated with hours after onset. CT perfusion is an effective imaging modality for the diagnosis and treatment decisions for acute stroke, particularly more serious strokes

Usefulness of Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSAⓇ) Device for Stereoelectroencephalography Electrode Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the efficiency and safety of using the Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSAⓇ) device (Zimmer Biomet; Warsaw, IN, USA) for stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) electrode implantation in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a literature search was carried out. Overall, 855 nonduplicate relevant articles were determined, and 15 of them were selected for analysis. The benefits of the ROSAⓇ device use in terms of electrode placement accuracy, as well as operative time length, perioperative complications, and seizure outcomes, were evaluated. Studies that were included reported on a total of 11,257 SEEG electrode implantations. The limited number of comparative studies hindered the comprehensive evaluation of the electrode implantation accuracy. Compared with frame-based or navigation-assisted techniques, ROSAⓇ-assisted SEEG electrode implantation provided significant benefits for reduction of both overall operative time (mean difference [MD], −63.45 min; 95% confidence interval [CI] from −88.73 to −38.17 min; P < 0.00001) and operative time per implanted electrode (MD, −8.79 min; 95% CI from −14.37 to −3.21 min; P = 0.002). No significant differences existed in perioperative complications and seizure outcomes after the application of the ROSAⓇ device and other techniques for electrode implantation. To conclude, the available evidence shows that the ROSAⓇ device is an effective and safe surgical tool for trajectory-guided SEEG electrode implantation in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, offering benefits for saving operative time and neither increasing the risk of perioperative complications nor negatively impacting seizure outcomes

Hemifacial Spasm Caused by Veins Confirmed by Intraoperative Monitoring of Abnormal Muscle Response

Background: Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is a benign disease caused by the hyper excitement of facial nerves owing to vessel compression. The offending vessels are usually arteries, such as anterior and posterior inferior cerebellar or vertebral arteries, but there are few reports of vein involvement cases. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate veins as offending vessels in patients with HFS confirmed by abnormal muscle response (AMR). Methods: We analyzed 5 patients with HFS caused by veins among 78 patients with HFS over the past 10 years. All patients underwent microvascular decompression (MVD) with AMR monitoring, whereas 3 of them underwent a second MVD. The mean follow-up time was 97 months. Results: Arteries were thoroughly decompressed in 3 patients with a failed first MVD surgery who received a second surgery, during which veins at the root exit point (RExP) were decompressed with the disappearance or a significant decrease in the amplitude of AMR. Two patients showed spasm resolution after the first surgery when veins were decompressed together with the disappearance of AMR. The location of veins was RExP and the cisternal portion. All patients had excellent outcomes within 3 months, and no complications were observed. Conclusions: Veins can be offending vessels in HFS patients. AMR is useful to determine the endpoint in these cases. Once arteries are decompressed thoroughly with residual AMR, surrounding veins at unusual sites, such as the RExP or the cisternal portion, must be checked to prevent persistent HFS. Complete decompression of veins leads to a good clinical outcome. Key words: Abnormal muscle response, Hemifacial spasm, Vei

Is Hippocampal Resection Necessary for Low-Grade Epilepsy-Associated Tumors in the Temporal Lobe?

Low-grade epilepsy-associated tumors (LEATs) are common in the temporal lobe and can cause drug-resistant epilepsy. Complete resection of LEATs is sufficient for seizure relief. However, hippocampal resection might result in postoperative cognitive impairment. This study aimed to clarify the necessity of hippocampal resection for seizure and cognitive outcomes in patients with temporal lobe LEATs and a normal hippocampus. The study included 32 patients with temporal lobe LEATs and without hippocampal abnormalities. All patients underwent gross total resection as treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy at our tertiary epilepsy center from 2005 to 2020, followed by at least a 12-month follow-up period. Seizure and cognitive outcomes were compared between patients who underwent additional hippocampal resection (Resected group) and those who did not (Preserved group). Among the participants, 14 underwent additional hippocampal resection and 28 (87.5%) achieved seizure freedom irrespective of hippocampal resection. The seizure-free periods were not different between the two groups. Additional hippocampal resection resulted in a significantly negative impact on the postoperative verbal index. In conclusion, additional hippocampal resection in patients with temporal lobe LEATs without hippocampal abnormalities is unnecessary because lesionectomy alone results in good seizure control. Additional hippocampal resection may instead adversely affect the postoperative language function

Single-Institutional Experience of Chronic Intracranial Electroencephalography Based on the Combined Usage of Subdural and Depth Electrodes

Implantation of subdural electrodes on the brain surface is still widely performed as one of the “gold standard methods” for the presurgical evaluation of epilepsy. Stereotactic insertion of depth electrodes to the brain can be added to detect brain activities in deep-seated lesions to which surface electrodes are insensitive. This study tried to clarify the efficacy and limitations of combined implantation of subdural and depth electrodes in intractable epilepsy patients. Fifty-three patients with drug-resistant epilepsy underwent combined implantation of subdural and depth electrodes for long-term intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) before epilepsy surgery. The detectability of early ictal iEEG change (EIIC) were compared between the subdural and depth electrodes. We also examined clinical factors including resection of MRI lesion and EIIC with seizure freedom. Detectability of EIIC showed no significant difference between subdural and depth electrodes. However, the additional depth electrode was useful for detecting EIIC from apparently deep locations, such as the insula and mesial temporal structures, but not in detecting EIIC in patients with ulegyria (glial scar). Total removal of MRI lesion was associated with seizure freedom. Depth electrodes should be carefully used after consideration of the suspected etiology to avoid injudicious usage

Single-Institutional Experience of Chronic Intracranial Electroencephalography Based on the Combined Usage of Subdural and Depth Electrodes

Implantation of subdural electrodes on the brain surface is still widely performed as one of the “gold standard methods” for the presurgical evaluation of epilepsy. Stereotactic insertion of depth electrodes to the brain can be added to detect brain activities in deep-seated lesions to which surface electrodes are insensitive. This study tried to clarify the efficacy and limitations of combined implantation of subdural and depth electrodes in intractable epilepsy patients. Fifty-three patients with drug-resistant epilepsy underwent combined implantation of subdural and depth electrodes for long-term intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) before epilepsy surgery. The detectability of early ictal iEEG change (EIIC) were compared between the subdural and depth electrodes. We also examined clinical factors including resection of MRI lesion and EIIC with seizure freedom. Detectability of EIIC showed no significant difference between subdural and depth electrodes. However, the additional depth electrode was useful for detecting EIIC from apparently deep locations, such as the insula and mesial temporal structures, but not in detecting EIIC in patients with ulegyria (glial scar). Total removal of MRI lesion was associated with seizure freedom. Depth electrodes should be carefully used after consideration of the suspected etiology to avoid injudicious usage

Corpus callosotomy in pediatric patients with non-lesional epileptic encephalopathy with electrical status epilepticus during sleep

Epileptic encephalopathy with electrical status epilepticus during sleep (ESES) is often refractory to medical treatment and leads to poor cognitive outcomes. Corpus callosotomy may be an effective treatment option for drug-resistant ESES with no focal etiology. We retrospectively identified three patients who underwent corpus callosotomy for drug-resistant ESES in our institution. Electroencephalography (EEG) findings and cognitive functions were evaluated before surgery, at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Age at surgery was 6 years 10 months, 7 years 9 months, and 8 years 4 months, respectively. Period between the diagnosis of ESES and surgery ranged from 7 to 25 months. All patients had no obvious structural abnormalities and presented with cognitive decline despite multiple antiseizure medications and steroid therapies. One patient showed complete resolution of ESES and an improvement of intelligence quotient after surgery. Epileptiform EEG was lateralized to one hemisphere after surgery and spike wave index (SWI) was decreased with moderate improvement in development and seizures in the other 2 patients. SWI re-exacerbated from 6 months after surgery, but without subsequent developmental regression in these 2 patients. Corpus callosotomy may become an important treatment option for drug-resistant ESES in patients with no structural abnormalities