32 research outputs found

    Aqua­{4,4′,6,6′-tetra­fluoro-2,2′-[(piperazine-1,4-di­yl)dimethyl­ene]diphenolato}copper(II)

    Get PDF
    In the title compound, [Cu(C18H16F4N2O2)(H2O)], the CuII atom shows a distorted square-pyramidal coordination geometry with the N,N′,O,O′-tetra­dentate piperazine–diphenolate ligand forming the basal plane. The apical site is occupied by the O atom of a coordinated water mol­ecule. Neighbouring complexes are associated through inter­molecular O—H⋯O and O—H⋯F hydrogen bonds between the water mol­ecule and a phenolate O atom or an F atom from an adjacent ligand, respectively, forming a centrosymmetric dimer. Dimers are linked by additional inter­molecular C—H⋯O and C—H⋯F hydrogen bonds, giving infinite chains propagating along the a axis

    A monoclinic polymorph of 4,4′-dichloro-2,2′-(piperazine-1,4-diyl­dimethyl­ene)diphenol

    Get PDF
    The titile compound, C18H20Cl2N2O2, crystallizes as a monoclinic form in the space group P21/n, with Z′ = 1/2. It is polymorphic with the previously reported orthorhombic form [Kubono, Tsuno, Tani & Yokoi (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, o2309]. In the present polymorph, the mol­ecule lies on a crystallographic inversion centre at the piperazine ring centroid. An intra­molecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bond forms an S(6) ring motif. Inter­molecular C—H⋯O hydrogen bonding generates a C(5) chain motif propagating along the b axis, forming sheets parallel to (02) with a first-level graph set S(6)C(5)R 6 6(34)

    Bis[μ-4,4′,6,6′-tetra­chloro-2,2′-(piperazine-1,4-diyldimethyl­ene)diphenolato]dicopper(II)

    Get PDF
    In the centrosymmetric dinuclear CuII title complex, [Cu2(C18H16Cl4N2O2)2], the CuII atom adopts a square-pyramidal geometry with a tetra­dentate ligand in the basal plane. The apical site is occupied by a phenolate O atom from an adjacent ligand, forming a dimer. The mol­ecular structure is stabilized by intra­molecular C—H⋯O and C—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds

    サンセイ スイヨウエキチュウ 二 オケル モリブデン(Ⅵ) ノ デンキョク ハンノウ ノ ケンキュウ

    Full text link
    this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 217(2), (1987), doi: 10.1016/0022-0728(87)80226-7this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 153(1-2), (1983), doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(83)80017-5this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 133(1), (1982), doi: 10.1016/0022-0728(82)87006-Xthis is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 132, (1982), doi: 10.1016/0022-0728(82)85017-1Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan,58(8), 2172-2175,198

    Anatomical consideration for safe pericardiocentesis assessed by three-dimensional computed tomography: Should an anterior or posterior approach be used?

    Get PDF
    AbstractBackgroundThe efficacy of epicardial catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia has been reported. However, the safest anatomical method for pericardial puncture has not been determined.MethodsThirty patients who underwent 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) preceding catheter ablations for atrial fibrillation were enrolled in this study. We used the skin surface 1cm below the xiphisternum as the puncture site. For the anterior approach, the attainment site was the pericardium of the mid portion of right ventricular anterior site, and for the posterior approach it was the pericardium of the inferior ventricular site. The distance and the angle between the 2 sites were measured using 3D-CT.ResultsFor the anterior approach, the distance was 54±11mm and the needle angle was 37±11° toward the left scapula and 34±12° towards the back of the body. For the posterior approach, the distance was 56±10mm and the corresponding needle angles were 60±9° and 86±13°. The distance correlated with BMI for the anterior and posterior approaches (anterior approach: r2=0.43, P<0.001; posterior approach: r2=0.49, P<0.001). Liver existed along the pathway of the posterior approach in 11 (37%) of 30 patients, and through in 2 (18%) of 11 patients. The liver and lung were not located along the pathway of the anterior approach in any patients.ConclusionsPerforming subxiphoid pericardiocentesis is anatomically safer via the anterior approach than via the posterior approach

    Intra-cardiac echocardiography guided catheter ablation of a right posterior accessory pathway in a patient with Ebstein׳s anomaly

    Get PDF
    AbstractWe report a case of Ebstein׳s anomaly in which radiofrequency catheter ablation of an accessory pathway was successfully performed under intra-cardiac echocardiography. A 50-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for radiofrequency catheter ablation of a paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. A 12-lead surface electrocardiogram revealed ventricular pre-excitation associated with type B Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome. In the baseline electrophysiological study, an orthodromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia with a right posterior accessory pathway was induced. A phased-array intra-cardiac echo probe was positioned in the right atrium to visualize the atrioventricular junction. The key structures for catheter ablation, such as the atrialized right ventricle, atrioventricular junction, and tricuspid valve, were clearly visualized on intra-cardiac echocardiography. Radiofrequency current was successfully delivered at the atrioventricular junction, where a Kent potential was recorded. During a 6-month follow-up period, the patient was free from arrhythmias. The findings in this case suggest that phased-array intra-cardiac echocardiography is useful for ablation of right-sided accessory pathways in patients with Ebstein׳s anomaly

    Visualization of the radiofrequency lesion after pulmonary vein isolation using delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging fused with magnetic resonance angiography

    Get PDF
    AbstractBackgroundThe radiofrequency (RF) lesions for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation can be visualized by delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI). However, the quality of anatomical information provided by DE-MRI is not adequate due to its spatial resolution. In contrast, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) provides similar information regarding the left atrium (LA) and pulmonary veins (PVs) as computed tomography angiography. We hypothesized that DE-MRI fused with MRA will compensate for the inadequate image quality provided by DE-MRI.MethodsDE-MRI and MRA were performed in 18 patients who underwent AF ablation (age, 60±9 years; LA diameter, 42±6mm). Two observers independently assessed the DE-MRI and DE-MRI fused with MRA for visualization of the RF lesion (score 0–2; where 0: not visualized and 2: excellent in all 14 segments of the circular RF lesion).ResultsDE-MRI fused with MRA was successfully performed in all patients. The image quality score was significantly higher in DE-MRI fused with MRA compared to DE-MRI alone (observer 1: 22 (18, 25) vs 28 (28, 28), p<0.001; observer 2: 24 (23, 25) vs 28 (28, 28), p<0.001).ConclusionsDE-MRI fused with MRA was superior to DE-MRI for visualization of the RF lesion owing to the precise information on LA and PV anatomy provided by DE-MRI

    Di-μ 2

    No full text
    corecore