Effects of Switching from Anti-VEGF Treatment to Triamcinolone Acetonide in Eyes with Refractory Macular Edema Associated with Diabetic Retinopathy or Retinal Vein Occlusion

Purpose. To evaluate the efficacy of switching from intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents to triamcinolone acetonide (TA) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) or with retinal vein occlusion-associated macular edema (RVO-ME) on the resolution of the macular edema (ME). Methods. The medical records of 11 eyes of 11 patients with DME and 9 eyes of 9 patients with RVO-ME whose MEs were refractory to anti-VEGF treatment were reviewed. The central retinal thickness (CRT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and the mean interval of the recurrences were measured during the anti-VEGF treatment and after switching to the TA injections. Results. Switching to TA injections significantly increased the mean interval for recurrences from 9.2±2.7 weeks to 22.3±12.9 weeks in eyes with DME (P=0.006). In eyes with RVO-ME, the mean period of recurrence was 12.3±5.6 weeks before and 11.6±4.4 weeks after the switch (P=0.44). The mean interval for recurrence was extended to more than 8 weeks in 7 of 11 eyes with DME, but none of the eyes with RVO-ME had a prolongation of more than 4 weeks. An elevation of the IOP was observed in 3 of the 20 eyes after the TA injection. Conclusions. These findings indicate that switching to TA injections can be a good option for DME eyes refractory to anti-VEGF injections but not for the RVO-ME eyes

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors Improve Chronic Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose. Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a vision-threatening condition that develops in diabetic patients. The first-line therapy for DME is intravitreal injections of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents; however, the high frequency of repeat injections, invasiveness of the procedure, and high cost are drawbacks for this treatment. The purpose of this report is to present our findings in 3 patients with chronic DME whose edema was resolved soon after oral doses of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors were used. Case Presentation. Case 1 was a 66-year-old woman diagnosed with moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (DR) with DME that had developed a decade earlier. The DME persisted for 4 years in the left eye. The addition of oral empagliflozin, a SGLT2 inhibitor, led to a marked improvement of the DME after one month, and this improvement continued over two years. Case 2 was a 68-year-old woman who was diagnosed with preproliferative DR with bilateral DME. The addition of oral dapagliflozin led to the improvement of the DME after two months, and this improvement continued over one year. Case 3 was a 61-year-old woman who was diagnosed with moderate nonproliferative DR with DME. Oral luseogliflozin was given which led to better glycemic control, and her left central retinal thickness (CRT) was markedly reduced after only two weeks. This reduction was maintained in her left eye for six months without any additional ophthalmic procedures. Conclusions. Although this study involved only three cases, our findings indicate that SGLT2 inhibitors might have possible efficacy for chronic DME

Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors Reduce Macular Edema in Patients with <i>Diabetes mellitus</i>

Purpose: To determine the efficacy of systemic sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: The medical records of patients with DME with a central retinal thickness (CRT) ≥320 µm in men and 305 µm in women, more than 6 months after the initiation of diabetes mellitus treatment, were reviewed. The CRT and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were evaluated before and after the initiation of systemic SGLT2i and non-SGLT2i treatments. Results: There were 24 eyes of 19 patients with DME that were treatment naïve or had not received treatments for the DME within four months before the initiation of SGLT2i. In these patients, the BCVA had a 0.31 ± 0.39 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units at the baseline, and it did not improve significantly at 0.26 ± 0.29 logMAR units after the initiation of SGLT2i (p = 0.56). However, the SGLT2i treatment significantly reduced the CRT from 423.3 ± 79.8 µm to 379.6 ± 69.5 µm (p = 0.0001). In the same evaluation of 19 eyes of 14 patients with DME that were initiated with non-SGLT2i agents, there was no significant difference between the baseline BCVA and the BCVA after the initiation of non-SGLT2i (p = 0.47). The CRT increased significantly after the initiation of non-SGLT2i (p = 0.0011). In three eyes in which the SGLT2i treatments were administered at the time of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments, the anti-VEGF treatment alone had only a limited effect on the DME, but the reduction in the DME was enhanced after the addition of SGLT2i. Conclusions: These findings indicate that systemic SGLT2i can reduce DMEs, and they suggest that SGLT2i may be an additional treatment option to anti-VEGF treatments for eyes with DMEs

Efficacy of One-Year Treatment with Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema with Practical Protocol

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of one-year treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) with intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) injections on a practical protocol. The medical records of 51 eyes of 43 patients who were diagnosed with DME and had received IVA treatments were reviewed. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the central macular thickness (CMT) were measured at the baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the IVA. The mean number of IVA injections was 3.8±2.4. The mean BCVA was significantly better and the CMT was thinner after the IVA at all follow-up times (P<0.05). The BCVA was better in eyes with a serous retinal detachment (SRD) than without a SRD (P<0.01). There was a significant correlation between the photoreceptor outer segment (PROS) length and BCVA at the baseline and at 12 months after the IVA (P<0.05). A fewer number of IVA injections significantly improved the BCVA and the CMT in eyes with DME after one-year treatment. IVA was more effective in the SRD+ group than in the SRD− group. The PROS length may be a predictive marker for visual outcomes after one-year treatment with IVA for DME (IRB#2272)