An Early Triassic small shelly fossil‐style assemblage from the Virgin Limestone Member, Moenkopi Formation, western United States

Small shelly fossils (SSFs) are minute fossils moulded or replaced by apatite, and less commonly, other minerals like glauconite and iron oxides. This taphonomic mode is best known from Cambrian deposits, though some occurrences occur across geological time. Instances of small shelly-style preservation were found in insoluble residues from the Lower Triassic Virgin Limestone Member exposed in southern Nevada, the western United States, a second such occurrence known from this unit. Fossil steinkerns of tiny brachiopods, echinoid spines and ophiuroids are fluorapatite, with scarce phosphatic internal moulds of bivalves and two replaced ostracods. In contrast, the crinoid ossicles, almost all of which are \u3e1000 µm, are preserved as stereomic moulds of silica or dolomite. Though the style of preservation is similar to another Virgin Limestone small shelly fossils-style assemblage, this assemblage preserves greater diversity, likely reflecting the variation in palaeocommunities across the shelf. The size selectivity of phosphatization is clear, as the majority of the fossils \u3c1000 µm are phosphatized. Importantly, the original skeletal material does not exert the strongest control on style of preservation: crinoid ossicles are replaced or moulded by silica whilst ophiuroid and echinoid fragments are phosphatized. It is likely that the underlying phosphatization mechanisms are related to the small particle size of the skeletons or skeletal elements coupled with the local pore water environment. Early Triassic equatorial seas characterized by warm temperatures and lower oxygen levels likely fostered small shelly fossil-style preservation across the shelf during this time

Problematica old and new

Problematica are taxa that defy robust phylogenetic placement. Traditionally the term was restricted to fossil forms, but it is clear that extant taxa may be just as difficult to place, whether using morphological or molecular (nucleotide, gene or genomic) markers for phylogeny reconstruction. We discuss the kinds and causes of Problematica within the Metazoa, as well as criteria for their recognition and possible solutions. The inclusive set of Problematica changes depending upon the nature and quality of (homologous) data available, the methods of phylogeny reconstruction and the sister taxa inferred by their placement or displacement. We address Problematica in the context of pre-cladistic phylogenetics, numerical morphological cladistics and molecular phylogenetics, and focus on general biological and methodological implications of Problematica, rather than presenting a review of individual taxa. Rather than excluding Problematica from phylogeny reconstruction, as has often been preferred, we conclude that the study of Problematica is crucial for both the resolution of metazoan phylogeny and the proper inference of body plan evolution