Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Infective Endocarditis in Adults: A WikiGuidelines Group Consensus Statement.

IMPORTANCE Practice guidelines often provide recommendations in which the strength of the recommendation is dissociated from the quality of the evidence. OBJECTIVE To create a clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of adult bacterial infective endocarditis (IE) that addresses the gap between the evidence and recommendation strength. EVIDENCE REVIEW This consensus statement and systematic review applied an approach previously established by the WikiGuidelines Group to construct collaborative clinical guidelines. In April 2022 a call to new and existing members was released electronically (social media and email) for the next WikiGuidelines topic, and subsequently, topics and questions related to the diagnosis and management of adult bacterial IE were crowdsourced and prioritized by vote. For each topic, PubMed literature searches were conducted including all years and languages. Evidence was reported according to the WikiGuidelines charter: clear recommendations were established only when reproducible, prospective, controlled studies provided hypothesis-confirming evidence. In the absence of such data, clinical reviews were crafted discussing the risks and benefits of different approaches. FINDINGS A total of 51 members from 10 countries reviewed 587 articles and submitted information relevant to 4 sections: establishing the diagnosis of IE (9 questions); multidisciplinary IE teams (1 question); prophylaxis (2 questions); and treatment (5 questions). Of 17 unique questions, a clear recommendation could only be provided for 1 question: 3 randomized clinical trials have established that oral transitional therapy is at least as effective as intravenous (IV)-only therapy for the treatment of IE. Clinical reviews were generated for the remaining questions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this consensus statement that applied the WikiGuideline method for clinical guideline development, oral transitional therapy was at least as effective as IV-only therapy for the treatment of IE. Several randomized clinical trials are underway to inform other areas of practice, and further research is needed

Sorting Out the Risks and Benefits of the #797 Recommended Intrapartum Vancomycin Dosing Approach

ACOG Committee Opinion #797 proposed intrapartum vancomycin dosing guidelines in the absence of thorough evaluation of its risk versus benefit profile on the maternal and neonatal systems. The previously published serum and cord-blood concentration–time data of vancomycin given to mothers in the intrapartum period was analyzed in this work with a two-compartment pharmacokinetic (PK) model. Monte Carlo simulation was used to establish exposure for the studied population for doses of 1000 mg to 2000 mg every 8 h for gestational ages (GA) of 33 to 40 weeks and for birth times up to 4-h intervals. Probabilities of target attainment (PTA) were calculated for efficacy and toxicity indices unique to the peripartum maternal and neonatal population. Neonatal evaluations indicate uniformly high PTAs for the evaluated dosing regimens when the efficacy target is considered. On the other hand, the PTAs for potentially nephrotoxic exposure is expected to reach undesirable levels when three or more doses were to be administered. The risk is profoundly high in GA below 36 weeks and birth times beyond 20 h after the initiation of intrapartum prophylaxis and with doses greater than 1250 mg. Maternal vancomycin exposures seem reasonable up to two intrapartum doses given at 8 h intervals when the dose is kept to 1250 mg or less. Most mothers (up to 83%) who receive three or more doses of the commonly administered regimens are subjected to nephrotoxic exposures. Thus, it appears that the current recommendations by #797 for dosing of vancomycin pose considerable risk to mother and newborn alike, especially in cases with lengthy duration of preterm labor. Capping of doses at 1250 mg may be considered to minimize the need for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) interventions. Alternatively, and irrespective of the baseline maternal renal function, TDM for all cases requiring more than two doses of 1500 mg or higher must be assured

Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Infective Endocarditis in Adults: A WikiGuidelines Group Consensus Statement.

IMPORTANCE: Practice guidelines often provide recommendations in which the strength of the recommendation is dissociated from the quality of the evidence. OBJECTIVE: To create a clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of adult bacterial infective endocarditis (IE) that addresses the gap between the evidence and recommendation strength. EVIDENCE REVIEW: This consensus statement and systematic review applied an approach previously established by the WikiGuidelines Group to construct collaborative clinical guidelines. In April 2022 a call to new and existing members was released electronically (social media and email) for the next WikiGuidelines topic, and subsequently, topics and questions related to the diagnosis and management of adult bacterial IE were crowdsourced and prioritized by vote. For each topic, PubMed literature searches were conducted including all years and languages. Evidence was reported according to the WikiGuidelines charter: clear recommendations were established only when reproducible, prospective, controlled studies provided hypothesis-confirming evidence. In the absence of such data, clinical reviews were crafted discussing the risks and benefits of different approaches. FINDINGS: A total of 51 members from 10 countries reviewed 587 articles and submitted information relevant to 4 sections: establishing the diagnosis of IE (9 questions); multidisciplinary IE teams (1 question); prophylaxis (2 questions); and treatment (5 questions). Of 17 unique questions, a clear recommendation could only be provided for 1 question: 3 randomized clinical trials have established that oral transitional therapy is at least as effective as intravenous (IV)-only therapy for the treatment of IE. Clinical reviews were generated for the remaining questions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this consensus statement that applied the WikiGuideline method for clinical guideline development, oral transitional therapy was at least as effective as IV-only therapy for the treatment of IE. Several randomized clinical trials are underway to inform other areas of practice, and further research is needed