Variation in the dispersions of powder liquid ratios in hand-mix glass ionomers

BACKGROUND: The Powder/Liquid Ratio (PLR) influence, and the literature regarding the handling and physical properties of Glass Ionomer restorative materials (GIC) were investigated. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the PLR variability and magnitude in hand-mix GICs, as dispensed for clinical use. From the recorded individual powder and liquid weights, additional comparisons could be made by pairing the various “extreme” outer observations in relation to the manufacturer’s PLR. STUDY DESIGN: The materials assessed were Ketac Universal Hand-mix (KUH), Riva Self Cure Hand-mix (RSCH) and Fuji IX GP Hand-mix (FIXH). Twenty scoops of powder were paired with twenty drops of liquid, as would be the case in the clinical scenario. Statistical analysis was completed with the Kruskal Wallis H test, Intraclass Correlation (ICC) and straight line regressions with One-way ANOVA and the post-hoc Tukey HSD Test (p<0.05 was considered significant). RESULTS: The powder and liquid observations indicate a lack of consistency in both the powder and liquid dispersions. The volume remained “one drop” but the weights were much lower than the manufacturer’s recommended drop weight for some observations, due to air in the liquid drop. The Kruskal-Wallis H test indicated significant differences (p=0.0001) between the three materials for the paired PLRs. The One-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey HSD Test were used to compare the recommended PLR to the results and the significant differences (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The recommended manufacturers’ powder and liquid weights were KUH 0.150/0.05g; RSC 0.165/0.035; FIXH 0.18/0.05, respectively. KUH, FIXH and RSCH liquid had powder and liquid dispersions above the manufacturer’s recommendations. FIXH had the most paired PLR observations within the ±10% range followed by KUH. Extreme powder and liquid combinations could occur in the clinical scenario and these combinations were considered

Color attributes and accuracy of vita-based manufacturers' shade guides

Operative Dentistry235266-27

Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: A comparison of water sorption characteristics

10.1016/0142-9612(95)00344-4Biomaterials17191897-1900BIMA

Post-irradiation hardness of resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a polyacid-modified composite resin

10.1023/A:1018501520931Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine87413-416JSMM

Effects of stabilization appliances on nocturnal parafunctional activities in patients with and without signs of temporomandibular disorders

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation25164-68JORH

Effects of storage, thermal and load cycling on a new reinforced glass-ionomer cement

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation25140-44JORH

Occlusal contact area (OCA) wear of two new composite restoratives

10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00814.xJournal of Oral Rehabilitation292194-200JORH

Occlusion and periodontal disease - Where is the link?

Singapore Dental Journal29122-2

Thermal emission by different light-curing units

Operative Dentistry283260-26

Effects of surface finish on indentation modulus and hardness of dental composite restoratives

10.1016/j.dental.2004.11.006Dental Materials21111008-1016DEMA