Etiologic Classification Criteria of ARCO on Femoral Head Osteonecrosis Part 1: Glucocorticoid-Associated Osteonecrosis.

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoid usage, a leading cause of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), and its prevalence was reported in 25%-50% of non-traumatic ONFH patients. Nevertheless, there have been no unified criteria to classify glucocorticoid-associated ONFH (GA-ONFH). In 2015, the Association Research Circulation Osseous addressed the issue of developing a classification scheme. METHODS: In June 2017, a task force was set up to conduct a Delphi survey concerning ONFH. The task force invited 28 experts in osteonecrosis/bone circulation from 8 countries. Each round of the Delphi survey consists of questionnaires, analysis of replies, and feedback reports to the panel. After 3 rounds of the survey, the panel reached a consensus on the classification criteria. The response rates were 100% (Round 1), 96% (Round 2), and 100% (Round 3), respectively. RESULTS: The consensus on the classification criteria of GA-ONFH included the following: (1) patients should have a history of glucocorticoid use >2 g of prednisolone or its equivalent within a 3-month period; (2) osteonecrosis should be diagnosed within 2 years after glucocorticoid usage, and (3) patients should not have other risk factor(s) besides glucocorticoids. CONCLUSION: Association Research Circulation Osseous established classification criteria to standardize clinical studies concerning GA-ONFH

Etiologic Classification Criteria of ARCO on Femoral Head Osteonecrosis Part 2: Alcohol-Associated Osteonecrosis.

BACKGROUND: Although alcohol is a leading risk factor for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and its prevalence reportedly ranges from 20% to 45%, there are no unified classification criteria for this subpopulation. In 2015, Association Research Circulation Osseous decided to develop classification criteria for alcohol-associated ONFH. METHODS: In June of 2017, Association Research Circulation Osseous formed a task force to conduct a Delphi survey. The task force invited 28 experts in osteonecrosis/bone circulation from 8 countries. Each round of the Delphi survey included questionnaires, analysis of replies, and feedback reports to the panel. After 3 rounds of the survey, consensus was reached on the classification criteria. The response rates for the 3 Delphi rounds were 100% (round 1), 96% (round 2), and 100% (round 3). RESULTS: The consensus on the classification criteria of alcohol-associated ONFH included the following: (1) patients should have a history of alcohol intake >400 mL/wk (320 g/wk, any type of alcoholic beverage) of pure ethanol for more than 6 months; (2) ONFH should be diagnosed within 1 year after alcohol intake of this dose; and (3) patients should not have other risk factor(s). CONCLUSION: ARCO-established classification criteria to standardize clinical studies concerning AA-ONFH

Clinical Outcomes for Total Hip Arthroplasty with and without Previous Curved Periacetabular Osteotomy

There are currently no reports on the clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) with previous curved periacetabular osteotomy (CPO), although the outcomes after THA with non-CPO types of periacetabular osteotomy have been reported. This study aimed to clarify the differences in clinical outcomes and radiographic features after THA with or without previous CPO. We performed a retrospective case–control with individual matching study. The participants were 10 patients with 11 hips that underwent cementless THA between October 1998 and October 2018 with previous CPO (osteotomy group). For the control group, we matched age, sex, and follow-up period, and included 32 patients with 33 hips that underwent cementless THA without previous CPO at a 1:3 ratio. The Harris Hip Score (HHS), cup size, position, and alignment, global offset (GO), operative time, perioperative blood loss, frequency of osteophyte removal, and major complications were compared between the two groups. The osteotomy group had no cases with revision surgery and dislocation. No significant differences were found between the two groups as follows: mean HHS, 94.9 points in the osteotomy group versus 92.7 points in the control group at the final follow-up; mean GO, 70.1 mm in the osteotomy group versus 71.4 mm in the control group; cup size, position, and alignment after THA; operative time; and perioperative blood loss. The frequency of osteophyte removal was higher in the osteotomy group. The take-home messages were that the clinical outcomes, including HHS, and radiographic features, including GO, after THA were equivalent in the two groups