Influence of early posttraumatic hypothermia therapy on local cerebral blood flow and glucose metabolism after fluid-percussion brain injury

Object Using autoradiographic image averaging, the authors recently described prominent foci of marked glucose metabolism-greater-than-blood-flow uncoupling in the acutely traumatized rat brain. Because hypothermia is known to ameliorate injury in this and other injury models, the authors designed the present study to assess the effects of post-traumatic therapeutic hypothermia on the local cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (LCMRglu) and local cerebral blood flow (LCBF) following moderate parasagittal fluid-percussion head injury (FPI) in rats. Methods Either cranial hypothermia (30°C) or normothermia (37°C) was induced for 3 hours in matched groups of rats immediately after FPI; LCMRglu and LCBF were assessed 3 hours after concluding these temperature manipulations. In rats subjected to FPI, regardless of whether normothermia or hypothermia ensued, LCBF was reduced relative to the sham-injury groups. In addition, when FPI was followed by hypothermia (FPI–30°C group), the subsequent LCBF was significantly lower (35–38% on average) than in FPI–37°C rats. Statistical mapping of LCBF difference imaging data revealed confluent cortical and subcortical zones of significantly reduced LCBF (largely ipsilateral to the prior injury) in FPI–30°C rats relative to the FPI–37°C group. Local glucose utilization was reduced in both hemispheres of FPI–37°C rats relative to the sham-injury group and was lower in the right (traumatized) hemisphere than in the left. However, LCMRglu values were largely unaffected by temperature manipulation in either the FPI or sham-injury groups. The LCMRglu/LCBF ratio was nearly doubled in FPI–30°C rats relative to the FPI–37°C group, in a diffuse and bihemispheric fashion. Linear regression analysis comparing LCMRglu and LCBF revealed that the FPI–37°C and FPI–30°C data sets were completely nonoverlapping, whereas the two sham-injury data sets were intermixed. Conclusions Despite its proven neuroprotective efficacy, early posttraumatic hypothermia (30°C for 3 hours) nonetheless induces a moderate decline in cerebral perfusion without the (anticipated) improvement in cerebral glucose utilization, so that a state of mild metabolism-greater-than-blood-flow dissociation is perpetuated

Effects of Ethanol and Naltrexone in a Model of Traumatic Brain Injury With Hemorrhagic Shock

Ethanol predisposes to traumatic injury and causes respiratory depression and cardiovascular compromise in models of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and hemorrhagic shock (HS). Endogenous opioids may play a role in ethanol intoxication and TBI. We studied the effects of ethanol and the opiate antagonist agent naltrexone (NTX) in a TBI/HS model. Methods : Fifty-six pigs (20 kg) were anesthetized with isoflurane, intubated, instrumented, and subjected to fluid percussion TBI with concurrent 30 ml/kg hemorrhage over 30 min. Seven groups were studied: Control, EtOH, NTX, INJ, INJ/EtOH, INJ/NTX, and INJ/EtOH/NTX. Ethanol (2 g/kg IV) was given preinjury, followed by infusion of 0.4 g/kg/hr. NTX 0.3 mg/kg intravenous was given 5 min postinjury. Parameters monitored for 120 min postinjury included minute ventilation (V E ), blood pressure (MAP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), cerebral venous lactate (Lac), arterial and cerebral venous blood gases, and brain tissue P ti O 2 . Results : Ethanol levels at injury were 220 mg/dL. Ethanol-treated animals had depression of hypercapnic ventilatory response, which was reversed by administration of naltrexone. MAP and CPP were significantly lower in injured animals, but were not significantly improved by NTX. Cerebral venous pH was lower and lactate was higher in ethanol-treated animals. Conclusion : In this TBI/HS model, NTX reverses ethanol-induced depression of hypercapnic ventilatory response but does not improve MAP, CPP, or metabolic acidosis. This suggests that the respiratory effects of ethanol in TBI, but not the hemodynamic effects, may be mediated by opiate receptor activation.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/65290/1/j.1530-0277.2001.tb02298.x.pd