Contrasting Architectural Philosophies: Andrea Palladio and Adolf Loos Through the Lens of Ornamentation, Aesthetic, and Techniques

Through the eyes of ornamentation, aesthetic, techniques, this research investigates the contrasting architectural philosophies of Andrea Palladio ( 1508 -1580 ) and Adolf Loos ( 1870 - 1933 ) . Even though they were 4 centuries apart they builders represent opposing viewpoints that had a significant impact on how each time period developed. Loos who despised ornamentation at the start of the modernist movement, is known for saying that ornament is crime. Palladio\u27s Italian Renaissance development of Classical ornamentation was in complete contrast to Loos\u27s practical and stern aesthetics. Palladio used elaborate carved elements, columns, and pediments into his designs. Influenced extensively from the architectural style of the ancient Greek and Roman cultures. Stylistically Loos started a new minimalist way which coincided with his Raumplan concept of spatial planning, while Palladio revived and reinterpreted Classical orders and proportions. Loose dropped non-essential elements, preferring to use simple cubic forms and industrial materials like steel and glass. Inversely Palladio\u27s famous villas and churches gave the essence of elegance and refinement with their symmetry, correct proportions, and traditional masonry construction. Although the two architects had a philosophical difference both were admirers of the technological advances that broadened the scope of design. Loos applied construction techniques like reinforced concrete, whereas Palladio used the sophisticated stonecutting and structural methods that produced domes, vaulting and monumental scales that were impossible before ornamentation Loose and Palladio had opposing views. Loos aimed to rid architecture of excessive embellishments in order to place function at the forefront. Palladio on the other hand added decorative elements to achieve a classical feeling of grandeur and beauty. This comparison demonstrates the variety of ambitions that different historical periods have for architecture.This analysis reveals the diverging philosophies of ornamentation, styles, and integration of the contemporary methods as the movements of modernism and Renaissance go through their processes

Bringing Biophilic Design to the Art Farm at Serenbe

People are drawn to nature, therefore are genetically biophilic. As third-year architecture students working on the future expansion of the Art Farm at Serenbe, we are investigating the incorporation of biophilic design concepts into architectural practice. This project sheds light on the effectiveness of biophilic strategies in improving human well-being and environmental sustainability through a comprehensive analysis of biophilic design principles.Through their seamless integration, our architectural strategies seek to improve people\u27s physical, mental, and overall health and wellness, as well as reduce stress levels and promote a deep connection with nature. Based on the scientifically proven research that the built environment has a significant impact on people\u27s health, this research studio aims to apply biophilic design techniques to establish built environments that are healthier, connected to the natural environment, and more harmonious for occupants. Based on the influential studies of “Designing Resilient Communities for the Future” by Dr. Phill Tabb, “14 Patterns of Biophilic Design” by Terrapin Bright Green, and “The Practice of Biophilic Design” by Stephen Kellert, this literature review of the emerging field of biophilic design addresses demands such as urbanization, environmental deterioration, and the increasing awareness of the role of nature. Employing a multifaceted research methodology, this study integrates various techniques to explore the complexities of biophilic design in architectural contexts. Biophilic pattern languages are utilized to distill design strategies rooted in nature\u27s inherent patterns and processes. Three-day on-site research in Serenbe, GA was conducted where ethnographic and phenomenological data gathering and analysis were performed as well as pre-design tasks and first-hand encounters with community members. The project aims to influence architects to create communities that support holistic health and create a closer connection with nature by clarifying effective design techniques and pointing out areas for the development of the Art farm at Serenbe