7 research outputs found

    Correlations between Oxidative Stress and Blood Lipids Are Stronger in Men than Women

    Get PDF
    Oxidative stress is one cause of atherosclerosis that makes it a lifestyle-related disease. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein (OxLDL) was previously found to be related to oxidative stress, measured using the diacron-reactive oxygen metabolites (d-ROMs) test and showed a negative correlation between biological antioxidant potential (BAP) test results and triglycerides (TG). In addition, large gender differences exist among vascular disorders caused by arteriosclerosis. However, such gender differences and their correlation with oxidative stress and blood lipids have not been clarified. In this study, gender differences in correlations between oxidative stress and blood lipids as factors in the development of atherosclerosis was addressed. Subjects were 149 individuals who underwent medical examinations conducted in Ashikaga Teishin Clinic in Tochigi, Japan (98 males and 51 females). A strong positive correlation was observed between d-ROMs test results and OxLDL in men (R=0.480, P<0.0001), but no correlation was seen in women. A strong negative correlation between BAP test results and TG was also noted in men (R=−0.571, P<0.0001), and a moderate negative correlation was detected in women (R=−0.344, P=0.0133). A positive correlation between d-ROMs tests and OxLDL was seen in women under 50 years of age (R=0.399, P=0.0393), but this correlation was not present in women who were 50 years of age or older (R=−0.00656, P=0.976). Correlations between oxidative stress and OxLDL and between antioxidant potential and TG in men were more prominent than in women. This finding suggests that decreasing oxidative stress in the blood to prevent atherosclerosis is more important for men

    Metabolic intervention by low carbohydrate diet suppresses the onset and progression of neuroendocrine tumors

    No full text
    Abstract Insulin signaling often plays a role in the regulation of cancer, including tumor initiation, progression, and response to treatment. In addition, the insulin-regulated PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway plays an important role in the regulation of islet cell proliferation, and this pathway is hyperactivated in human non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs). We, therefore, investigated the effect of a very low carbohydrate diet (ketogenic diet) on a mouse model that develops non-functional PanNETs to ask how reduced PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling might affect the development and progression of non-functional PanNET. We found that this dietary intervention resulted in lower PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling in islet cells and a significant reduction in PanNET formation and progression. We also found that this treatment had a significant effect on the suppression of pituitary NET development. Furthermore, we found that non-functional PanNET patients with lower blood glucose levels tend to have a better prognosis than patients with higher blood glucose levels. This preclinical study shows that a dietary intervention that results in lower serum insulin levels leads to lower insulin signals within the neuroendocrine cells and has a striking suppressive effect on the development and progression of both pancreatic and pituitary NETs

    Linagliptin inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in human U937 monocytes

    No full text
    Abstract Background Atherosclerosis and inflammation are more common in patients with diabetes than in patients without diabetes, and atherosclerosis progression contributes to inflammation. Therefore, anti-inflammatory therapy is important for the prognosis of patients with diabetes. Linagliptin is the only bile-excreted, anti-diabetic oral dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor. Although the anti-inflammatory effects of DPP-4 inhibitors in vivo and in vitro have been reported, few in vitro studies have examined the effects of linagliptin using monocytes, which play a central role in arteriosclerosis-related inflammation. Herein, we assessed the anti-inflammatory effects of linagliptin in human U937 monocytes. Methods U937 cells at densities of 1 × 106 cells/mL were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium supplied with 10% fetal bovine serum and treated with 100 nM phorbol myristate acetate for 48 h for differentiation into macrophages. The media were replaced, and the cells were pretreated with 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 nM linagliptin for 1 h or were left untreated. The media were then replaced again, and the cells were treated with 1 μg/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or 10 nM interleukin (IL)-1β only, in combination with 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 nM linagliptin or were left untreated. The extracted media were used to measure IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α levels using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Results LPS alone significantly increased IL-6 and TNF-α production compared with the control treatment. The treatment of cells with linagliptin at all concentrations significantly inhibited the LPS-stimulated IL-6 and TNF-α production. Meanwhile, IL-1β alone significantly increased IL-6 production compared with the control treatment. No significant difference in IL-6 production was noted between the cells treated with IL-1β and simultaneous treatment with IL-1β and linagliptin. Conclusions Linagliptin inhibited LPS-induced inflammation in human monocytic U937 cells

    Apixaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack: A subgroup analysis of the ARISTOTLE trial

    No full text
    Background: In the ARISTOTLE trial, the rate of stroke or systemic embolism was reduced by apixaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients with AF and previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) have a high risk of stroke. We therefore aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin in prespecified subgroups of patients with and without previous stroke or TIA. Methods: Between Dec 19, 2006, and April 2, 2010, patients were enrolled in the ARISTOTLE trial at 1034 clinical sites in 39 countries. 18 201 patients with AF or atrial flutter were randomly assigned to receive apixaban 5 mg twice daily or warfarin (target international normalised ratio 2·0-3·0). The median duration of follow-up was 1·8 years (IQR 1·4-2·3). The primary efficacy outcome was stroke or systemic embolism, analysed by intention to treat. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding in the on-treatment population. All participants, investigators, and sponsors were masked to treatment assignments. In this subgroup analysis, we estimated event rates and used Cox models to compare outcomes in patients with and without previous stroke or TIA. The ARISTOTLE trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NTC00412984. Findings: Of the trial population, 3436 (19%) had a previous stroke or TIA. In the subgroup of patients with previous stroke or TIA, the rate of stroke or systemic embolism was 2·46 per 100 patient-years of follow-up in the apixaban group and 3·24 in the warfarin group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·76, 95% CI 0·56 to 1·03); in the subgroup of patients without previous stroke or TIA, the rate of stroke or systemic embolism was 1·01 per 100 patient-years of follow-up with apixaban and 1·23 with warfarin (HR 0·82, 95% CI 0·65 to 1·03; p for interaction=0·71). The absolute reduction in the rate of stroke and systemic embolism with apixaban versus warfarin was 0·77 per 100 patient-years of follow-up (95% CI -0·08 to 1·63) in patients with and 0·22 (-0·03 to 0·47) in those without previous stroke or TIA. The difference in major bleeding with apixaban compared with warfarin was 1·07 per 100 patient-years (95% CI 0·09-2·04) in patients with and 0·93 (0·54-1·32) in those without previous stroke or TIA. Interpretation: The effects of apixaban versus warfarin were consistent in patients with AF with and without previous stroke or TIA. Owing to the higher risk of these outcomes in patients with previous stroke or TIA, the absolute benefits of apixaban might be greater in this population. Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd

    Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Vitamin K antagonists are highly effective in preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but have several limitations. Apixaban is a novel oral direct factor Xa inhibitor that has been shown to reduce the risk of stroke in a similar population in comparison with aspirin. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind trial, we compared apixaban (at a dose of 5 mg twice daily) with warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 3.0) in 18,201 patients with atrial fibrillation and at least one additional risk factor for stroke. The primary outcome was ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism. The trial was designed to test for noninferiority, with key secondary objectives of testing for superiority with respect to the primary outcome and to the rates of major bleeding and death from any cause. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 1.8 years. The rate of the primary outcome was 1.27% per year in the apixaban group, as compared with 1.60% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio with apixaban, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.95; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P = 0.01 for superiority). The rate of major bleeding was 2.13% per year in the apixaban group, as compared with 3.09% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.80; P<0.001), and the rates of death from any cause were 3.52% and 3.94%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.99; P = 0.047). The rate of hemorrhagic stroke was 0.24% per year in the apixaban group, as compared with 0.47% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.75; P<0.001), and the rate of ischemic or uncertain type of stroke was 0.97% per year in the apixaban group and 1.05% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.13; P = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with atrial fibrillation, apixaban was superior to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism, caused less bleeding, and resulted in lower mortality. Copyright © 2011 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved
    corecore