Thoracic duct drainage before and after cadaveric kidney transplantation

Twenty-seven consecutive recipients of cadaveric kidneys, including five with pre-existing warm cytotoxic antibodies, were treated with thoracic duct drainage before and after transplantation. Fourteen patients who had lymph drainage for 26 to 58 days before transplantation had minor cytotoxic antibody responses after grafting, even if the antibodies had been present before therapy. Only one of the 14 recipients had any rejection during the follow-up periods of one to six months. There were two deaths. The 13 patients pretreated for 17 to 23 days exhibited stronger cytotoxic antibody responsiveness, and five of these recipients had significant rejections of which four were reversible. One of the latter 13 patients died. These clinical and immunologic studies have established the value and have defined the appropriate timing of preoperative thoracic duct drainage in kidney transplantation. They have also directed attention to the rationale and the probable value of using other immunosuppressive methods for preparatory host conditioning instead of beginning such therapy at the time of transplantation

Abnormal prothrombin (DES-y-Carboxy Prothrombin) in hepatocellular carcinoma

Des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP), a protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) was measured by an enzyme immunoassay (E-1023) using anti-DCP monoclonal antibody in 92 patients with various hepatobiliary diseases. Thirty-six of the 38 patients (94.7%) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) had abnormal DCP levels greater than 0.1 arbitrary unit (AU)/ml, but only 18 of the 35 patients (51.4%) had AFP greater than 100 ng/ml (suspicious levels for HCC). There was no correlation between plasma or serum DCP and serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels. Serum alpha fetoprotein was elevated (above 20 ng/ml) in 23 of the 35 patients (65.7%), and DCP was elevated in all of the remaining 12 patients with normal AFP. DCP levels returned to normal levels following curative hepatic resection or orthotopic liver transplantation for HCC. DCP is a useful tumor marker in the diagnosis and postoperative monitoring of patients with HCC

Evaluation of sequential serum interleukin-6 levels in liver allograft recipients

Control serum levels of IL-6 measured by ELISA in 30 healthy blood donors or volunteers were 18±34 pg/ml (mean ± SD). Pretransplant serum levels of IL-6 in 169 adult candidates for liver transplantation were significantly higher than control in those with fulminant hepatitis (203±232 pg/ml), alcoholic cirrhosis (116±257 pg/ml), and hepatocellular carcinoma (82± 105 pg/ml). With these data as background, plasma or serum levels of IL-6 were monitored in 24 adult patients after first OLT and correlated with the clinical courses and the histopathological diagnosis of rejection. Serum or plasma levels of IL-6 decreased after transplantation regardless of pretransplant value. Four patients with infection subsequently developed continuously high IL-6 values. In the 20 of 24 patients who did not have infection, significantly higher levels of IL-6 were consistently found 0-4 days before histopathological diagnosis of rejection (131±78 pg/ml) compared with significantly lower values in patients without rejection episodes (40±21 pg/ml). The elevations of IL-6 were spike shaped, did not correlate well with the histopathological grades of rejection, and were highly responsive to augmented immunosuppression. These 20 cases were classified as: Group 1, no spikes of IL-6 after liver transplantation; group 2, single spike of IL-6 after liver transplantation; and group 3, multiple spikes of IL-6 after liver transplantation. The combined early and late graft loss of each group was 0% (group 1), 25% (group 2), and 67% (group 3). We conclude that daily monitored serum or plasma IL-6 levels can be a good premonitor of liver allograft rejection and also a useful predictor of long-term graft outcome. © 1994 by Williams & Wilkins

Multiscreen serum analysis of highly sensitized renal dialysis patients for antibodies toward public and private class I HLA determinants: Implications for computer-predicted acceptable and unacceptable donor mismatches in kidney transplantation

A multiscreen serum analysis program has been developed that permits a determination of antibody specificity for the vast majority of highly sensitized patients awaiting transplantation. This program is based on a 2 x 2 table analysis of correlations between serum reactivity with an HLA-typed cell panel and incorporates two modifications. One implements the concept of public HLA determinants based on the serologic crossreactivity among class I HLA antigens. The other modification derives from the premise that most highly sensitized patients maintain the same PRA and antibody profiles over many months and even years. Monthly screening results for patients with persistent PRA values can therefore be combined for analysis. For 132 of 150 highly sensitized patients with >50% PRA, this multiscreen serum analysis program yielded information about antibody specificity toward public and private class IHLA determinants. The vast majority of patients (108 of 112) with PRA values between 50 and 89% showed antibody specificity generally toward one, two, or three public markers and/or the more common private HLA-A, B antigens. For 24 of 38 patients with >90% PRA, it was possible to define one or few HLA-specific antibodies. The primary objective of the multiscreen program was to develop an algorithm about computer-predicted acceptable and unacceptable donor HLA-A, B antigens for patients with preformed antibodies. A retrospective analysis of kidney transplants into 89 highly sensitized patients has demonstrated that allografts with unacceptable HLA-A, B mismatches had significantly lower actuarial survival rates than those with acceptable mismatches (P = 0.01). This was shown for both groups of 32 primary transplants (44% vs. 67% after 1 year) and 60 retransplants (50% vs. 68%). Also, serum creatinine levels were significantly higher in patients with unacceptable class I mismatches (3.0 vs. 8.4 mg% [P = 0.007] after 2 weeks; 3.9 vs. 9.1 mg% [P = 0.014] after 4 weeks). Histopathologic analysis of allograft tissue specimens from 47 transplant recipients revealed a significantly higher incidence of humoral rejection (P = 0.02), but not cellular rejection, in the unacceptable mismatch group. These results suggest that the multiscreen program can establish which donor HLA-A, B mismatches must be avoided in kidney transplantation for most highly sensitized patients. For 18 of 150 high PRA renal dialysis patients, the multiscreen program could not define HLA-specific antibody. Most patients had >90% PRA, and many of their sera appeared to contain IgM type nonspecific lympho- cytotoxins that could be inactivated by dithioerythreitol (DTE). Preliminary studies have shown that this treatment enabled the detection of HLA-specific antibodies upon subsequent screening on many occasions. These data suggest that non-HLA specific reactivity revealed by multiscreen analysis can often be removed by DTE treatment. Multiscreen analysis offers an attractive approach to regional organ-sharing programs for highly sensitized renal transplant candidates. It enables the development of an efficient strategy for donor selection based on the computer assignment of acceptable HLA-A, B mismatches for each patient. © 1990 by Williams and Wilkins