SDSS J163459.82+204936.0: A Ringed Infrared-Luminous Quasar with Outflows in both Absorption and Emission Lines

SDSS J1634+2049 is a local (z = 0.1293) infrared-luminous quasar with LIR= 10^11.91 Lsun. We present a detailed multiwavelength study of both the host galaxy and the nucleus. The host galaxy demonstrates violent, obscured star formation activities with SFR ~ 140 Msun yr^-1, estimated from either the PAH emission or IR luminosity. The optical to NIR spectra exhibit a blueshifted narrow cuspy component in Hb, HeI5876,10830 and other emission lines consistently with an offset velocity of ~900 km/s, as well as additional blueshifting phenomena in high-ionization lines , while there exist blueshifted broad absorption lines (BALs) in NaID and HeI*3889,10830, indicative of the AGN outflows producing BALs and emission lines. Constrained mutually by the several BALs with CLOUDY, the physical properties of the absorption-line outflow are derived as follows: 10^4 < n_H <= 10^5 cm^-3, 10^-1.3 <= U <= 10^-0.7 and 10^22.5<= N_H <= 10^22.9 cm^-2 , similar to those derived for the emission-line outflows. The similarity suggests a common origin. Taking advantages of both the absorption lines and outflowing emission lines, we find that the outflow gas is located at a distance of 48 - 65 pc from the nucleus, and that the kinetic luminosity of the outflow is 10^44-10^46 erg s^-1. J1634+2049 has a off-centered galactic ring on the scale of ~ 30 kpc that is proved to be formed by a recent head-on collision by a nearby galaxy. Thus this quasar is a valuable object in the transitional phase emerging out of dust enshrouding as depicted by the co-evolution scenario.Comment: 13 figures, 6 tables; accepted for publication in Ap

What you don't know... can't hurt you? A natural field experiment on relative performance feedback in higher education

This paper studies the effect of providing feedback to college students on their position in the grade distribution by using a natural field experiment. This information was updated every six months during a three-year period. We find that greater grades transparency decreases educational performance, as measured by the number of examinations passed and grade point average (GPA). However, self-reported satisfaction, as measured by surveys conducted after feedback is provided but before students take their examinations, increases. We provide a theoretical framework to understand these results, focusing on the role of prior beliefs and using out-of-trial surveys to test the model. In the absence of treatment, a majority of students underestimate their position in the grade distribution, suggesting that the updated information is “good news” for many students. Moreover, the negative effect on performance is driven by those students who underestimate their position in the absence of feedback. Students who overestimate initially their position, if anything, respond positively. The performance effects are short lived—by the time students graduate, they have similar accumulated GPA and graduation rates

Aftershock Fragility Assessment of Continuous RC Girder Bridges Using a Modified Damage Index

Aftershock fragility is usually calculated conditioned on a range of potential post-mainshock damage states. The post-mainshock damage can be identified using damage indices, the latter being frequently associated with displacement-based parameters such as the maximum drift ratio or the residual displacement. However, when the reliable simulation of a structural system in a specific post-mainshock damage state is the objective of a numerical study, using such damage indicators may not assure the structure experiencing a homogeneous level of damage due to different mainshocks characteristics, which induce the aftershock fragility results unreliable. Along these lines, the current study presents a damage evaluation methodology mainly used for aftershock fragility assessment. It aims to reduce the variation of damage levels derived by using different mainshock seismic motions. The methodology presented herein includes: (i) the introduction of a damage index defined by comparing the monotonic pushover curve of the intact and post-earthquake damaged structure; (ii) the description of a finite element (FE)-based scheme that enables to quantify of the proposed damage index; and (iii) a deterioration-related modeling technique that can capture both strength and stiffness degrading performance of structural systems exposed to earthquake-induced excitations. The latter is essential to support the FE-based quantification scheme for the damage index. This methodology evaluation methodology can be primarily used for calculating the aftershock fragility assessment for a multi-span RC continuous girder bridge. The back-to-back incremental dynamic analysis framework uses a larger number of mainshock-aftershock artificial sequences to generate the aftershock fragility curves. The AS fragility results obtained via MBDI are compared with that via maximum drift ratio in terms of the ability to reduce the variation of residual capacities obtained using different mainshocks to induce a specific damage state but collapse by the same aftershock. The comparison shows a more robust relationship of MBDI with the residual capacity. It is found that MBDI, as well as its quantification approach proposed in this study, is a more effective damage predictor than the widely used displacement-based indices for AS fragility assessment

Aftershock Fragility Assessment of Continuous RC Girder Bridges Using a Modified Damage Index

Aftershock fragility is usually calculated conditioned on a range of potential post-mainshock damage states. The post-mainshock damage can be identified using damage indices, the latter being frequently associated with displacement-based parameters such as the maximum drift ratio or the residual displacement. However, when the reliable simulation of a structural system in a specific post-mainshock damage state is the objective of a numerical study, using such damage indicators may not assure the structure experiencing a homogeneous level of damage due to different mainshocks characteristics, which induce the aftershock fragility results unreliable. Along these lines, the current study presents a damage evaluation methodology mainly used for aftershock fragility assessment. It aims to reduce the variation of damage levels derived by using different mainshock seismic motions. The methodology presented herein includes: (i) the introduction of a damage index defined by comparing the monotonic pushover curve of the intact and post-earthquake damaged structure; (ii) the description of a finite element (FE)-based scheme that enables to quantify of the proposed damage index; and (iii) a deterioration-related modeling technique that can capture both strength and stiffness degrading performance of structural systems exposed to earthquake-induced excitations. The latter is essential to support the FE-based quantification scheme for the damage index. This methodology evaluation methodology can be primarily used for calculating the aftershock fragility assessment for a multi-span RC continuous girder bridge. The back-to-back incremental dynamic analysis framework uses a larger number of mainshock-aftershock artificial sequences to generate the aftershock fragility curves. The AS fragility results obtained via MBDI are compared with that via maximum drift ratio in terms of the ability to reduce the variation of residual capacities obtained using different mainshocks to induce a specific damage state but collapse by the same aftershock. The comparison shows a more robust relationship of MBDI with the residual capacity. It is found that MBDI, as well as its quantification approach proposed in this study, is a more effective damage predictor than the widely used displacement-based indices for AS fragility assessment