The Properties of Linezolid, Rifampicin, and Vancomycin, as Well as the Mechanism of Action of Pentamidine, Determine Their Synergy against Gram-Negative Bacteria

Combining pentamidine with Gram-positive-targeting antibiotics has been proven to be a promising strategy for treating infections from Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). However, which antibiotics pentamidine can and cannot synergize with and the reasons for the differences are unclear. This study aimed to identify the possible mechanisms for the differences in the synergy of pentamidine with rifampicin, linezolid, tetracycline, erythromycin, and vancomycin against GNB. Checkerboard assays were used to detect the synergy of pentamidine and the different antibiotics. To determine the mechanism of pentamidine, fluorescent labeling assays were used to measure membrane permeability, membrane potential, efflux pump activity, and reactive oxygen species (ROS); the LPS neutralization assay was used to evaluate the target site; and quantitative PCR was used to measure changes in efflux pump gene expression. Our results revealed that pentamidine strongly synergized with rifampicin, linezolid, and tetracycline and moderately synergized with erythromycin, but did not synergize with vancomycin against E. coli, K. pneumoniae, E. cloacae, and A. baumannii. Pentamidine increased the outer membrane permeability but did not demolish the outer and inner membranes, which exclusively permits the passage of hydrophobic, small-molecule antibiotics while hindering the entry of hydrophilic, large-molecule vancomycin. It dissipated the membrane proton motive force and inactivated the efflux pump, allowing the intracellular accumulation of antimicrobials that function as substrates of the efflux pump, such as linezolid. These processes resulted in metabolic perturbation and ROS production which ultimately was able to destroy the bacteria. These mechanisms of action of pentamidine on GNB indicate that it is prone to potentiating hydrophobic, small-molecule antibiotics, such as rifampicin, linezolid, and tetracycline, but not hydrophilic, large-molecule antibiotics like vancomycin against GNB. Collectively, our results highlight the importance of the physicochemical properties of antibiotics and the specific mechanisms of action of pentamidine for the synergy of pentamidine–antibiotic combinations. Pentamidine engages in various pathways in its interactions with GNB, but these mechanisms determine its specific synergistic effects with certain antibiotics against GNB. Pentamidine is a promising adjuvant, and we can optimize drug compatibility by considering its functional mechanisms

Inhibitory effects and mechanisms of intestinal electrical stimulation on gastric tone, antral contractions, pyloric tone, and gastric emptying in dogs

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects and mechanisms of intestinal electrical stimulation (IES) on gastric tone, antral and pyloric contractions, and gastric emptying in dogs. Female hound dogs were equipped with a duodenal or gastric cannula, and one pair of serosal electrodes was implanted in the small intestine. The study consisted of five different experiments. Liquid gastric emptying was assessed by collection of chyme from the duodenal cannula in a number of sessions with and without IES and with and without N-nitro-l-arginine (l-NNA). Postprandial antral and pyloric contractions were measured with and without IES and in the absence and presence of l-NNA or phentolamine by placement of a manometric catheter into the antrum and pylorus via the duodenal cannula. Gastric tone was assessed by measurement of gastric volume at a constant pressure. Gastric emptying was substantially and significantly delayed by IES or l-NNA compared with the control session. IES-induced delay of gastric emptying became normal with addition of l-NNA. IES reduced gastric tone, which was blocked by l-NNA. IES also inhibited antral contractions (frequency and amplitude), and this inhibitory effect was not blocked by l-NNA but was blocked by phentolamine. IES alone did not affect pyloric tone or resistance, but IES + l-NNA decreased pyloric tone. In conclusion, IES reduces gastric tone via the nitrergic pathway, inhibits antral contractions via the adrenergic pathway, does not affect pyloric tone, and delays liquid gastric emptying. IES-induced delay of gastric emptying is attributed to its inhibitory effects on gastric motility