End-of-life care across Southern Europe: A critical review of cultural similarities and differences between Italy, Spain and Portugal

n/

Culture Is a Priority for Research in End-of-Life Care in Europe: A Research Agenda

n/

Pla estratègic d’atenció pal·liativa especialitzada de Catalunya: bases del model de futur

Pla estratègic; Atenció pal·liativa; Atenció centrada en la personaPlan estratégico; Atención paliativa; Atención centrada en la personaStrategic plan; Palliative care; Person centered careAquest Pla estratègic aborda la planificació estratègica de l’atenció a les persones amb necessitats pal·liatives per part dels equips i dispositius de cures pal·liatives específics (a partir d’ara, atenció pal·liativa especialitzada), mentre que de forma conjunta amb la direcció estratègica d’atenció primària i comunitària serà necessari el replantejament de l’atenció al final de vida de forma transversal

Pla estratègic d'atenció geriàtrica i pal·liativa especialitzada de Catalunya: línies estratègiques, projectes i actuacions

Pla estratègic; Atenció pal·liativa; Atenció centrada en la personaPlan estratégico; Atención paliativa; Atención centrada en la personaStrategic plan; Palliative care; Person centered careAquest document conté les línies estratègiques, projectes i actuacions del Pla estratègic d'atenció geriàtrica i pal·liativa especialitzada de Catalunya

Prevalence and characteristics of patients with advanced chronic conditions in need of palliative care in the general population: a cross-sectional study

Background: Of deaths in high-income countries, 75% are caused by progressive advanced chronic conditions. Palliative care needs to be extended from terminal cancer to these patients. However, direct measurement of the prevalence of people in need of palliative care in the population has not been attempted. Aim: Determine, by direct measurement, the prevalence of people in need of palliative care among advanced chronically ill patients in a whole geographic population. Design: Cross-sectional, population-based study. Main outcome measure: prevalence of advanced chronically ill patients in need of palliative care according to the NECPAL CCOMS-ICO© tool. NECPAL+ patients were considered as in need of palliative care. Setting/participants: County of Osona, Catalonia, Spain (156,807 inhabitants, 21.4% > 65 years). Three randomly selected primary care centres (51,595 inhabitants, 32.9% of County's population) and one district general hospital, one social-health centre and four nursing homes serving the patients. Subjects were all patients attending participating settings between November 2010 and October 2011. Results: A total of 785 patients (1.5% of study population) were NECPAL+: mean age = 81.4 years; 61.4% female. Main disease/ condition: 31.3% advanced frailty, 23.4% dementia, 12.9% cancer (ratio of cancer/non-cancer = 1/7), 66.8% living at home and 19.7% in nursing home; only 15.5% previously identified as requiring palliative care; general clinical indicators of severity and progression present in 94% of cases. Conclusions: Direct measurement of prevalence of palliative care needs on a population basis is feasible. Early identification and prevalence determination of these patients is likely to be the cornerstone of palliative care public health policies

The prognostic value of the NECPAL instrument, Palliative Prognostic Index, and PROFUND index in elderly residents of nursing homes with advanced chronic condition

Abstract Background It is essential to assess the need for palliative care and the life prognosis of elderly nursing home residents with an advanced chronic condition, and the NECPAL ICO-CCOMS©4.0 prognostic instrument may be adequate for both purposes. The objective of this study was to examine the predictive capacity of NECPAL, the Palliative Prognosis Index, and the PROFUND index in elderly residents with advanced chronic condition with and without dementia, comparing their results at different time points. Methods This prospective observational study was undertaken in eight nursing homes, following the survival of 146 residents with advanced chronic condition (46.6% with dementia) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The capacity of the three instruments to predict mortality was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with 95% confidence interval, for the global population and separately for residents with and without dementia. Results The mean age of residents was 84.63 years (± 8.989 yrs); 67.8% were female. The highest predictive capacity was found for PROFUND at 3 months (95%CI: 0.526–0.756; p = 0.016), for PROFUND and NECPAL at 12 months (non-significant; AUC > 0.5), and NECPAL at 24 months (close-to-significant (AUC = 0.624; 95% CI: 0.499–0.750; p = 0.053). The highest capacity at 12 months was obtained using PROFUND in residents with dementia (AUC = 0.698; 95%CI: 0.566–0.829; p = 0.003) and NECPAL in residents without dementia (non-significant; AUC = 0.649; 95%CI: 0.432–0.867; p = 0.178). Significant differences in AUC values were observed between PROFUND at 12 (p = 0.017) and 24 (p = 0.028) months. Conclusions PROFUND offers the most accurate prediction of survival in elderly care home residents with advanced chronic condition overall and in those with dementia, especially over the short term, whereas NECPAL ICO-CCOMS©4.0 appears to be the most useful to predict the long-term survival of residents without dementia. These results support early evaluation of the need for palliative care in elderly care home residents with advanced chronic condition