Extraction of abandoned, potentially dangerous lead with uncovered proximal ending: A case report and method description

In this study, we present the case of the extraction of a non-functioning, abandoned, chronically implanted nine year-old lead with proximal extended frayed ending, displaced spontaneously into the subclavian vein. The seemingly inaccessible lead was extracted from the body using the femoral approach. The lead was looped with a pig-tail catheter, standard guide-wire, and basket Dotter catheter, and the proximal ingrown ending was liberated. Finally, it was grasped with a basket catheter and its tip was liberated using oblique cut rotated internal sheath of a Femoral Working Station: using it as a Byrd dilator designed for subclavian approach. An additional difficulty was the risk of dislodging the correct endocardial lead in the pacemaker-dependent patient. The procedure indicates the necessity for the production of longer Byrd dilators designed for the femoral approach. (Cardiol J 2012; 19, 2: 192–196

Complicated Holter tracing with an incidence of inappropriate mode switch due to sensing abnormalities in a patient with dual-chamber pacemaker

24-hour Holter monitoring of a 59 year-old man with DDDR pacemaker (programmed mode: DDD) implanted for sick sinus syndrome with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was performed one month after implantation, due to palpitations. Several episodes of rapid pacing of decreasing rate were detected. Intracardiac recording stored in the pacemaker memory had shown episodes of atrial lead oversensing, which led to the mode switch, resulting in DDIR mode. Signals which caused oversensing were not seen in Holter tracing. (Cardiol J 2011; 18, 1: 94-96

The usefulness of 24 hour Holter monitoring in asymptomatic pacemaker patients in early post-implantation period

Background: Twenty four hour Holter monitoring (HM) in an early post-implantation period in asymptomatic patients is considered as class IIb according to the ACC/AHA guidelines. It seems that post-implantation assessment extended by 24 hour HM in these patients might shorten hospitalization and increase safety of these patients. This aspect has not been widely discussed so far. The aim of our study was to evaluate pacing and sensing disturbances in asymptomatic patients with proper parameters of single and double chamber pacemakers. Methods: Studied group included 236 patients implanted with Biotronik Actros S (single chamber) (group I - 130 patients) and Biotronik Actros D or Axios D (group II - 106 patients) pacemakers. In all the patients 24 hour HM was performed 1-6 days after implantation (mean 3.4) in order to assess all pacing and sensing disturbances. Results: Sensing disturbances were found in 2 patients from group I and 22 patients from group II (the most frequent pacemaker failure was atrial undersensing followed by ventricular oversensing-T wave stering). In 1 patient from group I atrial failure to pace was observed. In whole group pacing/sensing disturbances were found in 23% of patients, nevertheless they did not provoke any hemodynamic consequences. Conclusions: In an early post-implantation period pacemaker disturbances occur in 23% of asymptomatic patients being more frequent in patients with dual chamber pacemaker. Atrial undersensing and ventricular oversensing are the most common disturbances, nevertheless having no hemodynamic consequences they are not life-threatening. Detection of these episodes in an early post-implantation period allows for early change in pacemakers’ parameters and thus decreasing risk of rehospitalization. We confirmed the low usefulness of HM in patients with single chamber pacemaker early after implantation

Whether noninvasive optimization of AV and VV delays improves the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Background: Device optimization is not routinely performed in patients who underwentcardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation. Noninvasive optimization ofCRT devices by measurement of cardiac output (CO) can be used as a simple method to assessventricular systolic performance. The aim of this study was to assess whether optimization ofatrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delay can improve hemodynamic response toCRT and whether this optimization should be performed for each patient individually.Methods: Twenty patients with advanced heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA)class III/IV, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35% and left bundle branch block (QRS ≥ 120 ms)in sinus rhythm were evaluated from 24 h to 48 h after implantation of a CRT device by meansof impedance cardiography (ICG). CO was fi rst measured at each patient’s intrinsic rhythm.Patients then underwent adjustments of AV and VV delay from 80 ms to 140 ms and from–60 ms to +60 ms, respectively in 20 ms increment steps and CO at each setting was measuredby ICG. Both AV and VV delays were programmed according to the greatest improvement inCO compared to intrinsic rhythm.Results: There was a statistically signifi cant increase in CO measured at the intrinsic rhythmcompared to different AV delay by mean of 21% (3.8 ± 1.0 vs. 4.6 ± 0.1 L/min, p < 0.05).Optimal AV/VV delays with left ventricle-preexcitation or simultaneous biventricular pacingcaused additional increased CO from intrinsic rhythm by mean of 32.6% (3.8 ± 1.0 vs. 5.04 ±± 1.0 L/min, p < 0.05). Optimal AV/VV setting delays also resulted in improved hemodynamicresponses compared to VV factory setting delay.Conclusions: Both AV and VV delay optimization should be performed in clinical practice.Optimal AV delay improved outcome. However, combination of optimized AV/VV delays providedthe best hemodynamic response. Optimized AV/VV delays with left ventricle-preexcitationor simultaneous biventricular pacing increased hemodynamic output compared to intrinsicrhythm and VV factory setting delay

Electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes in patients with left bundle branch block or paced rhythm

The population of patients with a pacemaker is constantly growing in number. Myocardial infarction in these patients, like in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), is called the undetermined type and characterizes the highest risk of death. Therefore the early and correct diagnosis of AMI is very important. The electrocardiographic criteria of the recognition of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients with a ventricular pacing are similar to the electrocardiographic criteria of the recognition of AMI in patients with LBBB. They are applicable in the first phase of AMI’s diagnostic process and they are known as Sgarbossa’s criteria. However, one should remember about differences between these two groups of patients and therefore particular criteria have got different significance in patients from each group. There are three Sgarbossa’s criteria: ST-segment elevation of ≥ 5 mm in the presence of a negative QRS complex, ST-segment elevation of ≥ 1 mm in the presence of a positive QRS complex and ST-segment depression of ≥ 1 mm in lead V1, V2 or V3. In spite of all limitations of use ECG records in the recognition of AMI in patients with a ventricular pacing it should be remembered, that this method (together with a typical medical history) is still the simplest, the cheapest and the most available means of an early diagnosis of AMI. In patients with chest pain, the presence of a pacemaker should not defer the execution of ECG recording because ECG may be very helpful in establishing of the diagnosis. (Cardiol J 2007; 14: 207-213