Phase II Study of Celecoxib and Docetaxel in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients with Progression after Platinum-Based Therapy

IntroductionTo evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of celecoxib and docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer after failure of platinum-based therapy.MethodsPatients with relapsed non-small cell lung cancer received celecoxib 400 mg orally twice daily beginning 7 days before the first cycle of docetaxel and the celecoxib was continued with no interruption. Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 was administered intravenously on a 21-day cycle. The primary end point of the study was the 6-month survival rate.ResultsTwenty-four patients were enrolled and twenty patients were treated (median age 60, M:F 16:8). Most patients had a baseline performance status of 1. The objective response rate was 10% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0–25%) and the 6-month survival rate was 59% (95% CI 37–80%). Median survival time was 6.9 months (95% CI, 2.8–15.2 months) and the 1- and 2-year survival rates were 36% (95% CI, 15–57%) and 1% (95% CI, 0–10%), respectively. The most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (58%) and neutropenic fever (21%) which resulted in early closure of the trial.ConclusionsThe addition of celecoxib to docetaxel did not seem to improve the response rate and survival compared with docetaxel alone. The combination demonstrated considerable neutropenia and complications from febrile neutropenia that suggests celecoxib may enhance the marrow toxicity of docetaxel

Phase II Study of Cediranib in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: SWOG S0509

IntroductionMalignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) tumors express vascular epithelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF receptors. We conducted a phase II study of the oral pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, cediranib, in patients with MPM after platinum-based systemic chemotherapy.MethodsPatients with MPM previously treated with a platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen and a performance status 0 to 2 were eligible for enrollment. Cediranib 45 mg/d was administered until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was response rate. Tumor measurements were made by RECIST criteria, with a subset analysis conducted using modified RECIST. A two-stage design with an early stopping rule based on response rate was used.ResultsFifty-four patients were enrolled. Of 47 evaluable patients, 4 patients (9%) had objective responses, 16 patients (34%) had stable disease, 20 patients (43%) had disease progression, 2 patients (4%) had symptomatic deterioration, and 1 patient (2%) had early death. The most common toxicities were fatigue (64%), diarrhea (64%), and hypertension (70%); 91% of patients required a dose reduction. Median overall survival was 9.5 months, 1-year survival was 36%, and median progression-free survival was 2.6 months.ConclusionCediranib monotherapy has modest single-agent activity in MPM after platinum-based therapy. However, some patient tumors were highly sensitive to cediranib. This study provides a rationale for further testing of cediranib plus chemotherapy in MPM and highlights the need to identify a predictive biomarker for cediranib

Risk Factors Associated with a Second Primary Lung Cancer in Patients with an Initial Primary Lung Cancer

Objectives: Increased patient survivorship following initial primary lung cancer (IPLC) due to advancing clinical practice has uncovered new clinical challenges. With growing patient longevity, individuals post-IPLC continue to be at higher subsequent risk of developing secondary primary lung cancer (SPLC). Proper SPLC surveillance guidelines aimed at monitoring IPLC survivors is crucial to enhancing life expectancy in this population. This study aims to categorize risk factors associated with SPLC emergence in IPLC survivors for clinical use following IPLC treatment. Materials and Methods: Using the Karmanos Cancer Institute Tumor Registry, patients diagnosed with IPLC from 2000 to 2017 were identified. Patients diagnosed with SPLC were matched for histology, age and stage to individuals who did not develop SPLC. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to identify potential risk factors for SPLC emergence and overall survival. Results: 121 patients diagnosed with IPLC who later developed SPLC were identified and compared to 120 patients with IPLC who did not develop SPLC. Patients who did not undergo surgical resection had a significantly lower probability of developing SPLC (OR 0.235, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.118 to 0.450; p\u3c0.001). Compared to surgical resection patients, individuals who did not have surgery as their primary treatment for IPLC had a significantly higher hazard of death (HR 3.088, 95% CI: 2.114 to 4.512; p\u3c0.001). Conclusion: This study uncovered notable associations and lack thereof between several competing risk factors and SPLC development as well as mortality. Further characterization of SPLC risk factors is essential for implementing effective surveillance recommendations

Brief Report: Safety and Antitumor Activity of Alectinib Plus Atezolizumab From a Phase 1b Study in Advanced ALK-Positive NSCLC

INTRODUCTION: Alectinib is a preferred first-line treatment option for advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Combination regimens of alectinib with immune checkpoint inhibitors are being evaluated for synergistic effects. METHODS: Adults with treatment-naive, stage IIIB/IV, or recurrent ALK-positive NSCLC were enrolled into a two-stage phase 1b study. Patients received alectinib 600 mg (twice daily during cycle 1 and throughout each 21-d cycle thereafter) plus atezolizumab 1200 mg (d8 of cycle 1 and then d1 of each 21-d cycle). Primary objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability of alectinib plus atezolizumab. Secondary objectives included assessments of antitumor activity. RESULTS: In total, 21 patients received more than or equal to 1 dose of alectinib or atezolizumab. As no dose-limiting toxicities were observed in stage 1 (n = 7), the starting dose and schedule were continued into stage 2 (n = 14). Median duration of follow-up was 29 months (range: 1-39). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 57% of the patients, most often rash (19%). No grade 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse events were reported. Confirmed objective response rate was 86% (18 of 21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 64-97). Median progression-free survival was not estimable (NE) (95% CI: 13 mo-NE), neither was median overall survival (95% CI: 33 mo-NE). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of alectinib and atezolizumab is feasible, but increased toxicity was found compared with the individual agents. With small sample sizes and relatively short follow-up, definitive conclusions regarding antitumor activity cannot be made

Phase I Clinical Trial of 5-Fluoro-Pyrimidinone (5FP), an Oral Prodrug of 5-Fluorouracil (5FU)

Purpose: 5-Fluoro-Pyrimidinone (5FP)is an oral pro-drug of 5-Fluorouracil(5FU), and is converted to 5FU by hepaticaldehyde oxidase. Preclinically, 5FPdemonstrated anti-tumor activity againstcolon 38 and P 388 leukemia models in mice. Using an accelerated titration trial designwith one patient cohorts and initial 100%escalations, a Phase I trial was conductedto determine the maximum tolerated dose(MTD) of 5FP and describe its toxicity andpharmacokinetic profile.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45222/1/10637_2004_Article_390715.pd

Recent Advances in Lung Cancer: Summary of Presentations from the 45th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (2009)

Abstract:Over the past decade, gradual progress has been made in improving the outcomes of patients with lung cancer. This review summarizes the findings from selected studies presented at the recently concluded 45th annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. This report will focus only on findings that are of immediate relevance to clinical practice. The topics discussed here range from the long-term safety of adjuvant chemotherapy and a new systemic chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer to the emerging issue of maintenance chemotherapy and the use of biomarkers in the treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer