91 research outputs found

    The Most Luminous Supernovae

    Full text link
    Recent observations have revealed an amazing diversity of extremely luminous supernovae, seemingly increasing in radiant energy without bound. We consider here the physical limits of what existing models can provide for the peak luminosity and total radiated energy for non-relativistic, isotropic stellar explosions. The brightest possible supernova is a Type I explosion powered by a sub-millisecond magnetar. Such models can reach a peak luminosity of 2×1046 erg s1\rm 2\times10^{46}\ erg\ s^{-1} and radiate a total energy of 4×1052 erg\rm 4 \times10^{52}\ erg. Other less luminous models are also explored, including prompt hyper-energetic explosions in red supergiants, pulsational-pair instability supernovae, and pair-instability supernovae. Approximate analytic expressions and limits are given for each case. Excluding magnetars, the peak luminosity is near 1×1044 erg s1\rm 1\times10^{44}\ erg\ s^{-1} for the brightest models. The corresponding limits on total radiated power are 3×1051 erg\rm3 \times 10^{51}\ erg (Type I) and 1×1051 erg\rm1 \times 10^{51}\ erg (Type II). A magnetar-based model for the recent transient event, ASASSN-15lh is presented that strains, but does not exceed the limits of what the model can provide.Comment: 5 pages, 2 figures and 1 table. Submitted to The Astrophysical Journal Letter

    Pair Instability Supernovae of Very Massive Population III Stars

    Get PDF
    Numerical studies of primordial star formation suggest that the first stars in the universe may have been very massive. Stellar models indicate that non-rotating Population III stars with initial masses of 140-260 Msun die as highly energetic pair-instability supernovae. We present new two-dimensional simulations of primordial pair-instability supernovae done with the CASTRO code. Our simulations begin at earlier times than previous multidimensional models, at the onset of core collapse, to capture any dynamical instabilities that may be seeded by collapse and explosive burning. Such instabilities could enhance explosive yields by mixing hot ash with fuel, thereby accelerating nuclear burning, and affect the spectra of the supernova by dredging up heavy elements from greater depths in the star at early times. Our grid of models includes both blue supergiants and red supergiants over the range in progenitor mass expected for these events. We find that fluid instabilities driven by oxygen and helium burning arise at the upper and lower boundaries of the oxygen shell \sim 20 - 100 seconds after core bounce. Instabilities driven by burning freeze out after the SN shock exits the helium core. As the shock later propagates through the hydrogen envelope, a strong reverse shock forms that drives the growth of Rayleigh--Taylor instabilities. In red supergiant progenitors, the amplitudes of these instabilities are sufficient to mix the supernova ejecta.Comment: 42 pages, 15 figures (accepted to ApJ

    General Relativistic Instability Supernova of a Supermassive Population III Star

    Full text link
    The formation of supermassive Population III stars with masses \gtrsim 10,000 Msun in primeval galaxies in strong UV backgrounds at zz \sim 15 may be the most viable pathway to the formation of supermassive black holes by zz \sim 7. Most of these stars are expected to live for short times and then directly collapse to black holes, with little or no mass loss over their lives. But we have now discovered that non-rotating primordial stars with masses close to 55,000 Msun can instead die as highly energetic thermonuclear supernovae powered by explosive helium burning, releasing up to 1055 ^{55} erg, or about 10,000 times the energy of a Type Ia supernova. The explosion is triggered by the general relativistic contribution of thermal photons to gravity in the core of the star, which causes the core to contract and explosively burn. The energy release completely unbinds the star, leaving no compact remnant, and about half of the mass of the star is ejected into the early cosmos in the form of heavy elements. The explosion would be visible in the near infrared at zz \lesssim 20 to {\it Euclid} and the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST), perhaps signaling the birth of supermassive black hole seeds and the first quasars.Comment: 23 pages, 4 figures (accepted to ApJ

    Cosmological Impact Of Population III Binaries

    Get PDF
    We present the results of the stellar feedback from Population III (Pop III) binaries by employing improved, more realistic Pop III evolutionary stellar models. To facilitate a meaningful comparison, we consider a fixed mass of 60 M-circle dot incorporated in Pop III stars, either contained in a single star, or split up in binary stars of 30 M-circle dot each or an asymmetric case of one 45 and one 15 M-circle dot star. Whereas the sizes of the resulting H II regions are comparable across all cases, the He III regions around binary stars are significantly smaller than that of the single star. Consequently, the He+ 1640 angstrom recombination line is expected to become much weaker. Supernova (SN) feedback exhibits great variety due to the uncertainty in possible explosion pathways. If at least one of the component stars dies as a hypernova about 10 times more energetic than conventional core-collapse SNe, the gas inside the host minihalo is effectively blown out, chemically enriching the intergalactic medium (IGM) to an average metallicity of 10(-4)-10(-3) Z(circle dot), out to similar to 2 kpc. The single star, however, is more likely to collapse into a black hole, accompanied by at most very weak explosions. The effectiveness of early chemical enrichment would thus be significantly reduced, in contrast to. the lower mass binary stars, where at least one component is likely to contribute to heavy element production and dispersal. Important new feedback physics is also introduced if close binaries can form high-mass X-ray binaries, leading to the pre-heating and -ionization of the IGM beyond the extent of the stellar H II regions.IAU-Gruber FellowshipStanwood Johnston FellowshipKITP Graduate FellowshipDOE HEP Program DE-SC0010676NSF AST 0909129, AST-1009928, AST-1109394, PHY02-16783NASA Theory Program NNX14AH34GNASA NNX09AJ33GARC Future Fellowship FT120100363Monash University Larkins FellowshipDOE DE-GF02-87ER40328, DE-FC02-09ER41618Astronom
    corecore