10 research outputs found
National Collegiate Student Loan Trust v. Texas Student Borrower: Brief in Support of Defendant's Appeal from a Default Judgment
No full textThe Effect of the 2018 Elections on the Texas Courts of Appeals: Better Demographic Representation, Greater Partisan Balance, and More Complex Decision-Making Dynamics
No full textRetroactive Judicial Imputation of Consent to (Arguably) Predatory Loan Terms into a Student's Loan Application: A Critique of Foster v. NCSLT 2007-4, No. 01-17-00253-CV, 2018 WL 1095760 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.] March 1, 2018, no. pet. h.).
No full textResults of a Pilot Study of Judicial Processing of Debt Collection Cases under Ceteris Paribus Conditions
No full textDividing the Spoils: Multilateral Contingent Fee Fights in Texas (Amicus Curiae Brief in Garza v. The Pruneda Law Firm)
No full textHow Do Discover Bank Debtors Fare in Trial Courts? An Empirical Investigation of Credit Card Collection Litigation in Texas
No full text
Under what circumstances could maximising turnout alter an election result?
No full textThis article analyses the potential for an alteration in turnout changing an election result, after taking into account the offices at stake, the electoral system, prior turnout, the number of parties competing, the division of the prior vote and the gap between the leader and secondâplace party. A review of electoral processes in 29 European countries plus the United States finds that even if an increase in turnout altered the distribution of the national vote, this of itself is insufficient to alter an election result
