4 research outputs found

    Recurrence and survival outcomes after anatomic segmentectomy versus lobectomy for clinical stage I non- Small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis

    Get PDF
    Purpose: Although anatomic segmentectomy has been considered a compromised procedure by many surgeons, recent retrospective, single-institution series have demonstrated tumor recurrence and patient survival rates that approximate those achieved by lobectomy. The primary objective of this study was to use propensity score matching to compare outcomes after these anatomic resection approaches for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients and Methods: A retrospective data set including 392 segmentectomy patients and 800 lobectomy patients was used to identify matched segmentectomy and lobectomy cohorts (n = 312 patients per group) using a propensity score matching algorithm that accounted for confounding effects of preoperative patient variables. Primary outcome variables included freedom from recurrence and overall survival. Factors affecting survival were assessed by Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results: Perioperative mortality was 1.2% in the segmentectomy group and 2.5% in the lobectomy group (P = .38). At a mean follow-up of 5.4 years, comparing segmentectomy with lobectomy, no differences were noted in locoregional (5.5% v 5.1%, respectively; P = 1.00), distant (14.8% v 11.6%, respectively; P = .29), or overall recurrence rates (20.2% v 16.7%, respectively; P = .30). Furthermore, when comparing segmentectomy with lobectomy, no significant differences were noted in 5-year freedom from recurrence (70% v 71%, respectively; P = .467) or 5-year survival (54% v 60%, respectively; P = .258). Segmentectomy was not found to be an independent predictor of recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.40) or overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.52). Conclusion: In this large propensity-matched comparison, lobectomy was associated with modestly increased freedom from recurrence and overall survival, but the differences were not statistically significant. These results will need further validation by prospective, randomized trials (eg, Cancer and Leukemia Group B 140503 trial)

    Intraoperative Cytology for Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery : A Quality Improvement Analysis

    No full text
    Background: Frozen section is a standard of care procedure during thoracic surgery when an immediate diagnosis is needed. An alternative procedure is intraoperative cytology. Video-assisted thoracic surgery is currently widely used for thoracic surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to assess intraoperative cytology together with frozen section for accuracy, turnaround time, and total response time during video-assisted thoracic surgery. Methods: We included patients having video-assisted thoracic surgery between August 2018 and February 2019 at our institution. A cytopathologist and a surgical pathologist independently performed intraoperative cytology and frozen sections, respectively. Final histologic diagnosis was the reference standard. Intraoperative cytology, frozen section turnaround, and total response times were analyzed. Results: A total of 52 specimens from 27 patients were included. The intraoperative cytology correlated with final histology in 98% of cases. Frozen section correlated with final histology in 100% of cases. Intraoperative cytology turnaround and total response times were equal (mean, 4.35 minutes; range, 2-15 minutes). Mean frozen section turnaround and response times were 26.2 minutes (range, 9-61 minutes) and 36.7 minutes (range, 16-90 minutes), respectively. We found a statistically significant difference between intraoperative cytology and frozen section turnaround time and total response times (P < .001). Conclusions: This study highlights that intraoperative cytology could be as accurate as frozen section and considerably faster during video-assisted thoracic surgery (P < .001). Total response time could potentially be used as a quality metric for video-assisted thoracic surgery
    corecore