Cardiac Arrest Caused by an Acute Intrathoracic Gastric Volvulus Treated With Percutaneous Gastrostomy

During cardiopulmonary resuscitation, one of the first priorities after establishing basic and advanced life support is to identify the cause of the arrest. We present a rare case of cardiac arrest due to a decreased venous return from mediastinal shift caused by a paraesophageal hernia with an incarcerated thoracic gastric volvulus, which was treated by percutaneous gastrostomy

Added value of semi-quantitative analysis of [18F]FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of device-related infections in patients with a left ventricular assist device

AIMS: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improve quality of life and survival in patients with advanced heart failure, but device-related infections (DRIs) remain cumbersome. We evaluated the diagnostic capability of [18F]FDG PET/CT, factors affecting its accuracy, and the additive value of semi-quantitative analysis for the diagnosis of DRI.METHODS AND RESULTS: LVAD recipients undergoing [18F]FDG PET/CT between 2012 and 2020 for suspected DRI were retrospectively included. [18F]FDG PET/CT was performed and evaluated in accordance with EANM guidelines. The final diagnosis of DRI, based on multidisciplinary consensus and findings during surgery, whenever performed, was used as the reference for diagnosis. 41 patients were evaluated for 59 episodes of suspected DRI. The clinical evaluation established driveline infection in 32 (55%) episodes, central device infection in 6 (11%), and combined infection in 2 (4%). Visual analysis of [18F]FDG PET/CT achieved a sensitivity and specificity for driveline infections of 0.79 and 0.71, respectively, whereas semi-quantitative analysis achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 0.94 and 0.83, respectively. For central device component infection, visual analysis of [18F]FDG PET/CT achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 0.75 and 0.60, respectively. Semi-quantitative analysis using SUVratio achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 1.0 and 0.8, respectively. The increase of specificity for central component infection was statistically significant (P = 0.05).CONCLUSIONS: [18F]FDG PET/CT reliably predicts the presence of DRI in LVAD recipients. Semi-quantitative analysis may increase the specificity of [18F]FDG PET/CT for the analysis of central device component infection and should be considered in equivocal cases after visual analysis.</p

Preferences to receive unsolicited findings of germline genome sequencing in a large population of patients with cancer

BACKGROUND: In precision medicine, somatic and germline DNA sequencing are essential to make genome-guided treatment decisions in patients with cancer. However, it can also uncover unsolicited findings (UFs) in germline DNA that could have a substantial impact on the lives of patients and their relatives. It is therefore critical to understand the preferences of patients with cancer concerning UFs derived from whole-exome (WES) or whole-genome sequencing (WGS). METHODS: In a quantitative multicentre study, adult patients with cancer (any stage and origin of disease) were surveyed through a digital questionnaire based on previous semi-structured interviews. Background knowledge was provided by showing two videos, introducing basic concepts of genetics and general information about different categories of UFs (actionable, non-actionable, reproductive significance, unknown significance). RESULTS: In total 1072 patients were included of whom 701 participants completed the whole questionnaire. Overall, 686 (85.1%) participants wanted to be informed about UFs in general. After introduction of four UFs categories, 113 participants (14.8%) changed their answer: 718 (94.2%) participants opted for actionable variants, 537 (72.4%) for non-actionable variants, 635 (87.0%) participants for UFs of reproductive significance and 521 (71.8%) for UFs of unknown significance. Men were more interested in receiving certain UFs than women: non-actionable: OR 3.32; 95% CI 2.05 to 5.37, reproductive significance: OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.05 to 3.67 and unknown significance: OR 2.00; 95% CI 1.25 to 3.21. In total, 244 (33%) participants conceded family members to have access to their UFs while still alive. 603 (82%) participants agreed to information being shared with relatives, after they would pass away. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the vast majority of patients with cancer desires to receive all UFs of genome testing, although a substantial minority does not wish to receive non-actionable findings. Incorporation of categories in informed consent procedures supports patients in making informed decisions on UFs

Preferences to receive unsolicited findings of germline genome sequencing in a large population of patients with cancer

BACKGROUND: In precision medicine, somatic and germline DNA sequencing are essential to make genome-guided treatment decisions in patients with cancer. However, it can also uncover unsolicited findings (UFs) in germline DNA that could have a substantial impact on the lives of patients and their relatives. It is therefore critical to understand the preferences of patients with cancer concerning UFs derived from whole-exome (WES) or whole-genome sequencing (WGS). METHODS: In a quantitative multicentre study, adult patients with cancer (any stage and origin of disease) were surveyed through a digital questionnaire based on previous semi-structured interviews. Background knowledge was provided by showing two videos, introducing basic concepts of genetics and general information about different categories of UFs (actionable, non-actionable, reproductive significance, unknown significance). RESULTS: In total 1072 patients were included of whom 701 participants completed the whole questionnaire. Overall, 686 (85.1%) participants wanted to be informed about UFs in general. After introduction of four UFs categories, 113 participants (14.8%) changed their answer: 718 (94.2%) participants opted for actionable variants, 537 (72.4%) for non-actionable variants, 635 (87.0%) participants for UFs of reproductive significance and 521 (71.8%) for UFs of unknown significance. Men were more interested in receiving certain UFs than women: non-actionable: OR 3.32; 95% CI 2.05 to 5.37, reproductive significance: OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.05 to 3.67 and unknown significance: OR 2.00; 95% CI 1.25 to 3.21. In total, 244 (33%) participants conceded family members to have access to their UFs while still alive. 603 (82%) participants agreed to information being shared with relatives, after they would pass away. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the vast majority of patients with cancer desires to receive all UFs of genome testing, although a substantial minority does not wish to receive non-actionable findings. Incorporation of categories in informed consent procedures supports patients in making informed decisions on UFs

Added value of semi-quantitative analysis of [18F]FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of device-related infections in patients with a left ventricular assist device

AIMS: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improve quality of life and survival in patients with advanced heart failure, but device-related infections (DRIs) remain cumbersome. We evaluated the diagnostic capability of [18F]FDG PET/CT, factors affecting its accuracy, and the additive value of semi-quantitative analysis for the diagnosis of DRI. METHODS AND RESULTS: LVAD recipients undergoing [18F]FDG PET/CT between 2012 and 2020 for suspected DRI were retrospectively included. [18F]FDG PET/CT was performed and evaluated in accordance with EANM guidelines. The final diagnosis of DRI, based on multidisciplinary consensus and findings during surgery, whenever performed, was used as the reference for diagnosis. 41 patients were evaluated for 59 episodes of suspected DRI. The clinical evaluation established driveline infection in 32 (55%) episodes, central device infection in 6 (11%), and combined infection in 2 (4%). Visual analysis of [18F]FDG PET/CT achieved a sensitivity and specificity for driveline infections of 0.79 and 0.71, respectively, whereas semi-quantitative analysis achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 0.94 and 0.83, respectively. For central device component infection, visual analysis of [18F]FDG PET/CT achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 0.75 and 0.60, respectively. Semi-quantitative analysis using SUVratio achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 1.0 and 0.8, respectively. The increase of specificity for central component infection was statistically significant (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: [18F]FDG PET/CT reliably predicts the presence of DRI in LVAD recipients. Semi-quantitative analysis may increase the specificity of [18F]FDG PET/CT for the analysis of central device component infection and should be considered in equivocal cases after visual analysis