Sinoatrial node dysfunction induces cardiac arrhythmias in diabetic mice

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to probe cardiac complications, including heart-rate control, in a mouse model of type-2 diabetes. Heart-rate development in diabetic patients is not straight forward: In general, patients with diabetes have faster heart rates compared to non-diabetic individuals, yet diabetic patients are frequently found among patients treated for slow heart rates. Hence, we hypothesized that sinoatrial node (SAN) dysfunction could contribute to our understanding of the mechanism behind this conundrum and the consequences thereof. METHODS: Cardiac hemodynamic and electrophysiological characteristics were investigated in diabetic db/db and control db/+ mice. RESULTS: We found improved contractile function and impaired filling dynamics of the heart in db/db mice, relative to db/+ controls. Electrophysiologically, we observed comparable heart rates in the two mouse groups, but SAN recovery time was prolonged in diabetic mice. Adrenoreceptor stimulation increased heart rate in all mice and elicited cardiac arrhythmias in db/db mice only. The arrhythmias emanated from the SAN and were characterized by large RR fluctuations. Moreover, nerve density was reduced in the SAN region. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced systolic function and reduced diastolic function indicates early ventricular remodeling in obese and diabetic mice. They have SAN dysfunction, and adrenoreceptor stimulation triggers cardiac arrhythmia originating in the SAN. Thus, dysfunction of the intrinsic cardiac pacemaker and remodeling of the autonomic nervous system may conspire to increase cardiac mortality in diabetic patients

α1-Antitrypsin deficiency associated with increased risk of heart failure

Background Individuals with α1-antitrypsin deficiency have increased elastase activity resulting in continuous degradation of elastin and early onset of COPD. Increased elastase activity may also affect elastic properties of the heart, which may impact risk of heart failure. We tested the hypothesis that α1-antitrypsin deficiency is associated with increased risk of heart failure in two large populations. Methods In a nationwide nested study of 2209 patients with α1-antitrypsin deficiency and 21 869 controls without α1-antitrypsin deficiency matched on age, sex and municipality, we recorded admissions and deaths due to heart failure during a median follow-up of 62 years. We also studied a population-based cohort of another 102 481 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study including 187 patients from the Danish α1-Antitrypsin Deficiency Registry, all with genetically confirmed α1-antitrypsin deficiency. Results Individuals with versus without α1-antitrypsin deficiency had increased risk of heart failure hospitalisation in the nationwide cohort (adjusted hazard ratio 2.64, 95% CI 2.25–3.10) and in the population-based cohort (1.77, 95% CI 1.14–2.74). Nationwide, these hazard ratios were highest in those without myocardial infarction (3.24, 95% CI 2.70–3.90), without aortic valve stenosis (2.80, 95% CI 2.38–3.29), without hypertension (3.44, 95% CI 2.81–4.22), without atrial fibrillation (3.33, 95% CI 2.75–4.04) and without any of these four diseases (6.00, 95% CI 4.60–7.82). Hazard ratios for heart failure-specific mortality in individuals with versus without α1-antitrypsin deficiency were 2.28 (95% CI 1.57–3.32) in the nationwide cohort and 3.35 (95% CI 1.04–10.74) in the population-based cohort. Conclusion Individuals with α1-antitrypsin deficiency have increased risk of heart failure hospitalisation and heart failure-specific mortality in the Danish population

Potassium Channel Interacting Protein 2 (KChIP2) is not a transcriptional regulator of cardiac electrical remodeling

The heart-failure relevant Potassium Channel Interacting Protein 2 (KChIP2) augments Ca(V)1.2 and K(V)4.3. KChIP3 represses Ca(V)1.2 transcription in cardiomyocytes via interaction with regulatory DNA elements. Hence, we tested nuclear presence of KChIP2 and if KChIP2 translocates into the nucleus in a Ca(2+) dependent manner. Cardiac biopsies from human heart-failure patients and healthy donor controls showed that nuclear KChIP2 abundance was significantly increased in heart failure; however, this was secondary to a large variation of total KChIP2 content. Administration of ouabain did not increase KChIP2 content in nuclear protein fractions in anesthetized mice. KChIP2 was expressed in cell lines, and Ca(2+) ionophores were applied in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. The cell lines had KChIP2-immunoreactive protein in the nucleus in the absence of treatments to modulate intracellular Ca(2+) concentration. Neither increasing nor decreasing intracellular Ca(2+) concentrations caused translocation of KChIP2. Microarray analysis did not identify relief of transcriptional repression in murine KChIP2(−/−) heart samples. We conclude that although there is a baseline presence of KChIP2 in the nucleus both in vivo and in vitro, KChIP2 does not directly regulate transcriptional activity. Moreover, the nuclear transport of KChIP2 is not dependent on Ca(2+). Thus, KChIP2 does not function as a conventional transcription factor in the heart