4 research outputs found

    Early, but not late therapy with a vasopressin V1a-antagonist ameliorates the development of renal damage after 5/6 nephrectomy

    No full text
    INTRODUCTION: Vasopressin, mainly through the V1a-receptor, is thought to be a major player in the maintenance of hyperfiltration. Its inhibition could therefore lead to a decrease in progression of chronic renal failure. To this end, the effect of the vasopressin V1a-receptor-selective antagonist, YM218, was studied on proteinuria and focal glomerulosclerosis in early and late intervention after 5/6 nephrectomy in rats, and compared with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I). MATERIALS AND METHODS: After 5/6 nephrectomy, early intervention was performed between week 2 and 10 thereafter with the V1a-receptor-selective antagonist (VRA, 10 mg/kg/day, n=10), enalapril (ACE-I, 10 mg/kg/day, n=9), or vehicle (n=8). Late intervention was performed in another group between week 6 and 12 with VRA (10 mg/kg/day, n=7), lisinopril (ACE-I, 5 mg/kg/day, n=7), or vehicle (n=7). RESULTS: In early intervention, proteinuria and focal glomerulosclerosis were significantly decreased by VRA compared to vehicle (44+7% and 59+8% respectively). ACE-I significantly decreased proteinuria (67+7%) and a trend towards a decrease in focal glomerulosclerosis was observed (30+18%). In late intervention, VRA did not decrease proteinuria and focal glomerulosclerosis compared to vehicle (21+20% and 0%, respectively), ACE-I significantly lowered proteinuria (92+2%) and a focal glomerulosclerosis (69+1%) lowering trend was observed. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that VRA may protect against early progression of renal injury after 5/6 nephrectomy, whereas its effectiveness seems limited in established renal damage

    Myocardial infarction does not further impair renal damage in 5/6 nephrectomized rats

    No full text
    Background. Recent observational studies show that reduced renal function is an independent risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease. Previously, we reported that myocardial infarction (MI) indeed enhanced mild renal function decline in rats after unilateral nephrectomy (NX) and that RAAS intervention inhibited this decline. The effects of an MI on pre-existing sever renal function loss and the effects of RAAS intervention interrupting this hypothesized cardiorenal interaction are however unknown and clinically even more relevant. Methods. Male Wistar rats underwent MI, sham MI, 5/6NX, or 5/6NX and MI. Six weeks later, the NX rats were treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or vehicle for 6 weeks. Results. An MI did not significantly induce more proteinuria (303 +/- 46 versus 265 +/- 24 mg/24 h) and glomerulosclerosis (40 +/- 11 versus 28 +/- 4 arbitrary units) in 5/6NX+MI compared to 5/6NX, and ACEi therapy was equally effective in reducing renal damage in these groups. In the 5/6NX+MI group, decreased renal blood flow and creatinine clearance were observed compared to 5/6NX (2.2 +/- 0.6 versus 3.6 +/- 0.4 ml/min/kg and 2.1 +/- 0.3 versus 2.9 +/- 0.3 ml/min/kg), which both increased after ACEi to levels comparable found in the group that underwent 5/6NX alone. Conclusions. MI does not further deteriorate structural renal damage induced by 5/6NX compared with 5/6NX alone. Furthermore, renal haemodynamic impairment occurs after MI, which can be improved applying ACEi therapy. Therefore, we conclude that treatment with ACEi should be optimized in patients with chronic kidney disease after MI to improve renal function

    Renal damage after myocardial infarction is prevented by renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system intervention

    No full text
    Recently, it was shown that myocardial infarction aggravates preexistent mild renal damage that is elicited by unilateral nephrectomy in rats. The mechanism behind this cardiorenal interaction likely involves the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system and/or vasoactive peptides that are metabolized by neutral endopeptidase (NEP). The renoprotective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition (ACEi) as well as combined ACE/NEP inhibition with a vasopeptidase inhibitor (VPI) was investigated in the same model to clarify the underlying mechanism. At week 17 after sequential induction of unilateral nephrectomy and myocardial infarction, treatment with lisinopril (ACEi), AVE7688 (VPI), or vehicle was initiated for 6 wk. Proteinuria and systolic BP (SBP) were evaluated weekly. Renal damage was assessed primarily by proteinuria, interstitial a-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) staining, and the incidence of focal glomerulosclerosis (FGS). At start of treatment, proteinuria had increased progressively to 167 +/- 20 mg/d in the entire cohort (n = 42). Both ACEi and VPI provided a similar reduction in proteinuria, a-SMA, and FGS compared with vehicle at week 23 (proteinuria 76 +/- 6 versus 77 +/- 4%; a-SMA 60 6 versus 77 +/- 3%; FGS 52 +/- 14 versus 61 +/- 10%). Similar reductions in systolic BP were observed in both ACEi- and VPI-treated groups (33 +/- 3 and 37 +/- 2%, respectively). Compared with ACEi, VPI-treated rats displayed a significantly larger reduction of plasma (41 +/- 5 versus 61 +/- 4%) and renal (53 +/- 6 versus 74 4%) ACE activity. It is concluded that both ACEi and VPI intervention prevent renal damage in a rat model of cardiorenal interaction. VPI treatment seemed to provide no additional renoprotection compared with sole ACEi after 6 wk of treatment in this model, despite a more pronounced ACE-inhibiting effect of VPI

    Intermediate term survival following open versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy in the Netherlands:results of the Cystectomie SNAPSHOT study

    Get PDF
    There is insufficient knowledge on intermediate-term survival of non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) after open (ORC) versus robot-assisted (RARC) cystectomy, with or without neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). This retrospective study was performed in 19 Dutch hospitals between 2012 and 2015 to assess the five-year survival after both interventions and the influence of NAC. Out of 1,534 cT1-4N0-1-patients, 1,086 patients were treated with ORC and 389 with RARC. The 5-year survival rate after ORC was 51% (95% CI 47–53) versus 58% after RARC (95% CI 52–63), hazard ratio 1.00 (95% CI 0.84–1.20) after multivariable analysis. 226 of 965 cT2-4aN0 patients were treated with NAC. More patients had ypT0 after NAC than after no NAC (31% vs 15%; p?< 0.01). The best five-year survival was in patients with ypT0 after NAC (89%; 95% CI 81–97). This study shows similar five-year survival of MIBC patients treated with ORC or RARC and shows that the best survival was after NAC
    corecore