Prevalence and visual outcomes of cataract surgery and cataract surgical coverage in Sri Lanka: findings from the National Blindness and Visual Impairment Survey

Introduction Cataract surgical coverage and visual acuity outcomes are important population level indicators for monitoring access to and the quality of cataract surgery, allowing subgroups with poorer access to be identified. Data on these indicators are not available for Sri Lanka at national level. Objectives Determine cataract surgical coverage and the outcomes of cataract surgery in a nationally representative sample of adults aged ≥40 years. Methods Cluster random sampling with proportionate to size procedures was used. All participants were interviewed to obtain data on education level, movable assets, and the year and place of cataract surgery, if applicable. Presenting and best corrected visual acuities were measured. All participants underwent slit lamp examination, including a dilated examination of the fundus. Cataract surgical coverage was calculated at the person level vision of <3/30, <6/60 and <6/18. Outcomes of cataract surgery were categorized as good (6/18 or better), borderline (<6/18-6/60) or poor (<6/60). Results A total of 345 persons among the 5,779 participants who were examined had undergone cataract surgery in one or both eyes (486 eyes). Cataract surgical coverage, which was high overall 85.4% for vision <3/60; 79.1% for vision <6/60), was significantly higher in younger age groups (Odds Ratio [OR] 5.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-22.52), those in urban areas (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.01-7.74) those with higher socio-economic status (OR 6.0; 95% CI 1.96-18.4). Coverage ranged from 60% in Uva Province to 100% in Southern Province. 59.7% of eyes had good outcomes at presentation increasing to 75.1% with correction. Conclusions Cataract surgery indicators for Sri Lanka are good, being better than most other Asian countries. Services should target those living in underserved Provinces

Prevalence, causes, magnitude and risk factors of visual impairment and blindness in Sri Lanka

Introduction There is paucity of data on the epidemiology of visual impairment in Sri Lanka. Objectives Estimate the prevalence and determine causes and risk factors of visual impairment among adults aged ≥40 years in Sri Lanka. Methods Multistage, stratified, cluster random sampling was used to select a nationally representative sample aged ≥40 years. All participants underwent vision testing, autorefraction and a basic eye examination. Participants with a presenting acuity of <6/12 in either eye underwent detailed eye examination, assessment of best-corrected acuity if required, and a cause of visual loss assigned. Results 5,779 of those enumerated (6,713) were examined (response rate 86.1%). The prevalence of blindness was 1.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-1.99%) and low vision was 17% (95% CI: 16.0-18.0%). Cataract (66.7%) and uncorrected refractive errors (12.5%) were the commonest causes of blindness. Uncorrected refractive errors (62.4%) and cataract (24.2%) were the commonest causes of low vision. Blindness was significantly higher in older age groups (OR 132.4: 95% Cl 11.7-149.3), those residing in the North Central (OR-12.5), North (OR-12.0), North West (OR-7.3), Eastern (OR-6.7), Western (OR-5.3) and Uva provinces (OR-5.3) compared to the Southern, and in those educated up to and including secondary school (OR 2.3: 95% CI 1.5- 3.17). Gender and socio-economic status were not significant after adjusting. Conclusions The prevalence of blindness in Sri Lanka is lower than in other South Asian countries and most causes are avoidable. Access to eye care needs to improve amongst the aged, those less educated and those in provinces with higher blindness risk

Prevalence and types of refractive errors, and spectacle coverage in Sri Lankan adults: The Sri Lanka National survey of blindness and visual impairment

Introduction Uncorrected refractive errors are the commonest cause of visual impairment globally. Despite this, the proportion of affected individuals who wear spectacles can be low, particularly in low and middle- income countries. No data were available for Sri Lanka. Objectives To estimate the prevalence of refractive errors and investigate their risk factors among adults aged 40 years and above. Another purpose was to calculate spectacle coverage and identify subgroups with low coverage. Methods Cluster random sampling was used to obtain a nationally representative sample. Presenting distance visual acuity was measured using a logMAR chart, with distance spectacle correction if usually worn. All underwent autorefraction and an optician measured best-corrected visual acuity after subjective refraction. Participants who had undergone cataract surgery were excluded. Spectacle coverage was assessed amongst participants with a visual acuity of <6/12 in the better eye due to refractive error who attended the examination site with spectacles. Results 5,779/6,713 (86.1%) enumerated adults were examined; 5,179 had refraction data. 67% had a refractive error: hyperopia 49.6%; myopia 17.4%. Refractive errors increased with age. Being aged 60 years and above and Sinhala ethnic group were independent risk factors. Spectacle coverage was 17.7% overall, being lower in females and the non-literate. Based on the findings, 1.66 million adults require spectacles for distance correction. Conclusions Refractive errors are very common in Sri Lankan adults, and there is a large unmet need for spectacles. Affordable services for refractive errors need to be scaled up, focusing on the most underserved subgroups in the population