13 research outputs found
Scottie Pippen’s Airball: On the Role of Fiduciary Duty Law in Illinois Professional Liability Cases, 48 J. Marshall L. Rev. 777 (2015)
The Origin and Evolution of the Third Party “Refusal to Deal” Defense in Illinois Corporate Opportunity Cases, 46 J. Marshall L. Rev. 937 (2013)
On Equipoise, Knowledge, and Speculation: A Unified Theory of Pleading Under the Defend Trade Secrets Act -- Jurisdiction, Identification, Misappropriation, and Inevitable Disclosure
Trade Secret Law: The Role of Information Governance Professionals, 18 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 27 (2018)
Trade secrets are rapidly becoming the most important assets of many businesses. Information Governance (IG) professionals can and should play an integral part in managing company trade secrets, but not all companies have IG professionals and not all IG professionals understand the meaning of trade secrets. This article maps the many facets of trade law and practice that are of potential interest to all IG professionals. It also highlights the different roles IG professionals can play with respect to trade secrets, from cataloging to monitoring to testifying
Corporate Opportunities and Corporate Competition in Illinois: A Comparative Discussion of Fiduciary Duties, 46 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2012)
Tort Remedy for Retaliatory Discharge: Illinois Workmen\u27s Compensation Act Limits Employer\u27s Power to Discharge Employees Terminable-at-Will - Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.
Method Matters: Statutory Construction Principles and the Illinois Trade Secrets Act Preemption Puzzle in the Northern District of Illinois
Appellate methodology makes a difference when it comes to the interplay between statutes and judge-made law. The Illinois Trade Secrets Act (ITSA) through its preemption provisions abolishes some non-statutory claims and preserves others, but the line between the two remains a mystery—a mystery of extraordinary importance to those with information not rising to the level of trade secrets. Illinois state and federal appellate decisions have not improved matters: for over 30 years these appeals courts have failed to follow standard statutory construction rules and have yet to articulate a rationale justifying their opinions for or against preemption. This flawed methodology produced nearly 50 Illinois district court published rulings between 1992 and 2014 alone, all unable to agree on a rule of decision—a stark illustration of why appellate method matters. These appellate deficiencies will continue to haunt Illinois district court decisions until the Illinois Supreme Court weighs in on the ITSA preemption issue, something that court has never done