Home Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) treatment for COPD patients with a history of NIV-treated exacerbation:a randomized, controlled, multi-center study

BACKGROUND: In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, the prognosis for patients who have survived an episode of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure due to an exacerbation is poor. Despite being shown to improve survival and quality-of-life in stable patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, long-term noninvasive ventilation is controversial in unstable patients with frequent exacerbations, complicated by acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. In an uncontrolled group of patients with previous episodes of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, treated with noninvasive ventilation, we have been able to reduce mortality and the number of repeat respiratory failure and readmissions by continuing the acute noninvasive ventilatory therapy as a long-term therapy. METHODS: Multi-center open label randomized controlled trial of 150 patients having survived an admission with noninvasive ventilatory treatment of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure due chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The included patients are randomized to usual care or to continuing the acute noninvasive ventilation as a long-term therapy, both with a one-year follow-up period. The primary endpoint is time to death or repeat acute hypercapnic respiratory failure; secondary endpoints are one-year mortality, number of readmissions and repeat acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, exacerbations, dyspnea, quality of life, sleep quality, lung function, and arterial gases. DISCUSSION: Though previous studies of long-term noninvasive ventilation have shown conflicting results, we believe the treatment can reduce mortality and readmissions when applied in patients with previous need of acute ventilatory support, regardless of persistent hypercapnia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.org: NCT01513655 16-Jan-2012

NIV for acute respiratory failure in COPD: high in-hospital mortality is determined by patient selection

Introduction: Hospital mortality among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients receiving NIV for acute respiratory failure has shown to be significantly higher in clinical settings than in the randomized trials (RCTs) which clinical guidelines are based on. This may be due to the quality of care of NIV or patient selection. In daily clinical practice, we include patients with terminal pulmonary disease with a do-not-intubate (DNI) or a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order with a high mortality risk compared to highly selected patients in RCTs. The aim of this study was to determine the role of patient selection for in-hospital mortality among patients receiving NIV for acute respiratory failure of COPD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including all patients receiving acute NIV due to acute respiratory failure at the respiratory wards in 2012–2013 at two hospitals in Greater Copenhagen. Results: Overall in-hospital mortality rate was 30%. In patients with a DNI/DNR order, mortality was 59% and in patients with no limitations in treatment 2%. Patients who fulfilled the exclusion criteria of the RCT by Plant et al. had a mortality of 41% compared to 25% in the remaining population. Conclusions: High overall in-hospital mortality reflects that patient selection in clinical practice is very different from RCT. Quality of acute NIV treatment seems acceptable in clinical practice for patients with less severe COPD and no limitations in treatment. Higher mortality in patients with DNI/DNR order may be due to inefficient NIV treatment for these patients with more severe COPD

Chest x-ray findings in tuberculosis patients identified by passive and active case finding: A retrospective study

Background: Chest x-ray is central in screening and diagnosis of tuberculosis. However, sputum culture remains gold standard for diagnosis. Aim: To establish the rate of normal chest x-rays in tuberculosis patients found by spot sputum culture screening, and compare them to a group identified through passive case finding. Method: Chest x-rays from 39 culture-positive patients, identified by spot sputum culture screening in Copenhagen from 2012 to 2014, were included in the study (spot sputum culture group(SSC)). 39 normal chest x-rays from persons screened by mobile x-ray, and 39 chest x-rays from tuberculosis-patients identified through passive case finding(PCF) were anonymised and randomised. Two respiratory physicians and two radiologists assessed the chest x-rays. Results: The normal chest x-ray rate was higher in the non-tuberculosis control group (median = 32 (82.1%), range = 74.4% – 100%), compared to the SSC group (median = 7 (17.9%), range = 10.3% – 33.3%), and the PCF controls (median = 3(7.7%), range = 2.6% – 15.4%). In the SSC group 14 (35.9%) were categorized as normal by at least one study participant. Conclusion: A substantial minority of patients diagnosed with tuberculosis by spot sputum culture screening, and through passive case finding would not have been identified with chest x-ray alone, highlighting that a normal chest x-ray does not exclude pulmonary tuberculosis. Keywords: Tuberculosis, Chest x-ray changes, Passive case finding, Active case finding, Chest x-ray assessment, Normal chest x-ra