Validierung und Reliabilitätsprüfung des Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire in deutscher Sprache

Hintergrund: Der Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) ist ein krankheitsspezifischer Fragebogen zur Erhebung der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität von Patienten vor und nach Cochleaimplantation. Ziel der Arbeit: Validierung und Reliabilitätsprüfung der deutschen Übersetzung des NCIQ. Material und Methoden: Es wurde eine prospektive Studie an 100 postlingual ertaubten oder hochgradig schwerhörigen Patienten durchgeführt, welche präoperativ sowie 3 und 6 Monate nach einer Cochleaimplantation mittels NCIQ, Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) und Hearing Participation Scale (HPS) untersucht wurden. Als Kontrolle fungierte ein postlingual ertaubtes oder hochgradig schwerhöriges, unbehandeltes Patientenkollektiv (n = 54). Cronbach‑α und Test-Retest-Reliabilität dienten der Reliabilitätsüberprüfung. Es wurde auf Inhalts‑, Übereinstimmungs- und auf diskriminative Validität getestet. Die Konstruktvaliditätsprüfung basiert auf kürzlich veröffentlichen Daten. Als Gütekriterien wurden die Sensitivität und eine ROC("Receiver Operating Characteristic")-Analyse, inklusive AUC("Area Under the ROC Curve")-Betrachtung, eingesetzt. Ergebnisse: Das Test-Retesting ergab nach 3 und 6 Monaten postoperativ stabile NCIQ-Werte. Die Cronbach-α-Werte wiesen auf eine gute interne Konsistenz hin. Der NCIQ diskriminierte valide zwischen behandelten und unbehandelten Patientengruppen. Es ergaben sich statistisch signifikante, wenn auch schwache, Korrelationen zwischen dem NCIQ und dem APHAB (r = -0,22; p = 0,04) und dem HPS (r = 0,30; p = 0,01). Sensitivitäts- und ROC-Analysen zeigten eine gute Messqualität des deutschsprachigen NCIQ. Schlussfolgerung: Die deutsche Übersetzung des NCIQ misst zuverlässig und valide die Lebensqualität vor und nach Cochleaimplantation und kann zur klinischen Erfolgskontrolle nach Cochleaimplantationen verwendet werden.Background: The Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) is a disease-specific questionnaire to determine the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients before and after cochlear implantation. Objective: This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the German translation of the NCIQ. Materials and methods: A prospective study was performed in 100 postlingually deaf or severely hearing-impaired patients. HRQoL was assessed using the NCIQ, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), and the Hearing Participation Scale (HPS) before as well as 3 and 6 months after cochlear implantation. An untreated group of postlingually deaf or severely hearing-impaired patients (n = 54) served as a control. Cronbach's α and test–retest reliability were measured. The content, discrimination, and agreement validity were tested. The evaluation of construct validity was based on recently published data. Sensitivity and receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis, including consideration of the area under the curve (AUC), were used as quality criteria. Results: The test-retest analysis showed stable NCIQ values 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The Cronbach’s α values indicated good internal consistency. The NCIQ validly discriminated between treated and untreated patient groups. There were statistically significant albeit weak correlations between the NCIQ and the APHAB (r = -0.22; p = 0.04) and the HPS (r = 0.30; p = 0.01). Sensitivity and ROC analyses showed good measurement quality of the German-speaking NCIQ. Conclusion: The German translation of the NCIQ reliably and validly measures HRQoL before and after cochlear implantation and can be used for clinical monitoring after treatment with cochlear implants

Prospective study on health-related quality of life in patients before and after cochlear implantation

Purpose!#!Assessing cochlear implant (CI)-associated patient outcomes is a focus of implant research. Most studies have analyzed outcomes retrospectively with low patient numbers and few measurement time points. In addition, standardized CI-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments have not been used. To address this, we prospectively assessed HRQoL in patients before and after implantation.!##!Methods!#!We assessed HRQoL using the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ), Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), Hearing Participation Scale (HPS), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in 100 deaf or severely hearing-impaired patients (57 unilaterally deaf and 43 bilaterally deaf) before and 3, 6, and 12 months after cochlear implantation. We compared the results of unilaterally and bilaterally hearing-impaired patients and patients with or without a hearing aid. Principal component (PCA) and exploratory factor analyses (EFA) were also conducted.!##!Results!#!The NCIQ measured improvements in all 6 domains after CI and correlated well with other QoL instruments. The PCA revealed that the NCIQ can be better explained by physical, physical advanced, and socio-psychological components. The APHAB score ameliorated over time, except for the background noise domain. The overall HPS score improved over time, but the hearing handicap subscore significantly decreased. Sociodemographic influences on the questionnaire scores were relatively weak.!##!Conclusion!#!Assessing HRQoL is essential for quantifying the patient outcome after CI. NCIQ scores in our patient cohort showed improved HRQoL in all domains and we recommend that the NCIQ be used as a first-line questionnaire for assessing QoL in hearing-impaired patients after CI