3 research outputs found
Environmental determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among adults: a systematic review
The current ecological approach in health behaviour research recognises that health behaviour needs to be understood in a broad environmental
context. This has led to an exponential increase in the number of studies on this topic. It is the aim of this systematic review to summarise the
existing empirical evidence pertaining to environmental influences on fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption. The environment was defined as ‘all
factors external to the individual’. Scientific databases and reference lists of selected papers were systematically searched for observational studies
among adults (18–60 years old), published in English between 1 January 1980 and 31 December 2004, with environmental factor(s) as independent factor(s), and fruit intake, vegetable intake or FV intake combined as one outcome measure as dependent factor(s). Findings showed there was
a great diversity in the environmental factors studied, but that the number of replicated studies for each determinant was limited. Most evidence
was found for household income, as people with lower household incomes consistently had a lower FV consumption. Married people had higher
intakes than those who were single, whereas having children showed mixed results. Good local availability (e.g. access to one’s own vegetable
garden, having low food insecurity) seemed to exert a positive influence on intake. Regarding the development of interventions, improved opportunities for sufficient FV consumption among low-income households are likely to lead to improved intakes. For all other environmental factors,
more replicated studies are required to examine their influence on FV intake
Chronically ill patients' preferences for a financial incentive in a lifestyle intervention. Results of a discrete choice experiment
Background
The preferences of diabetes type 2 patients and cardiovascular disease patients for a financial incentive added to a specified combined lifestyle intervention were investigated.
Methods
A discrete choice experiment questionnaire was filled out by 290 diabetes type 2 patients
(response rate 29.9%). Panel-mixed-logit models were used to estimate the preferences for
a financial incentive. Potential uptake rates of different financial incentives and relative
importance scores of the included attributes were estimated. Included attributes and levels
were: form of the incentive (cash money and different types of vouchers), value of the incentive (ranging from 15 to 100 euros), moment the incentive is received (start, halfway, after
finishing the intervention) and prerequisite for receiving the incentive (registration, attendance or results at group or individual level).
Results
Prerequisites for receiving the financial incentive were the most important attribute, according to the respondents. Potential uptake rates for different financial incentives ranged
between 37.9% and 58.8%. The latter uptake rate was associated with a financial incentive
consisting of cash money with a value of €100 that is handed out after completing the lifestyle program with the prerequisite that the participant attended at least 75% of the scheduled meetings.
Conclusions
The potential uptake of the different financial incentives varied between 37.9% and 58.8%.
The value of the incentive does not significantly influence the potential uptake. However, the potential uptake and associated potential effect of the financial incentive is influenced by the
type of financial incentive. The preferred type of incentive is €100 in cash money, awarded
after completing the lifestyle program if the participant attended at least 75% of the scheduled meetings
Cost-effectiveness of counseling and pedometer use to increase physical activity in the Netherlands: a modeling study
Background: Counseling in combination with pedometer use has proven to be effective in increasing physical activity and improving health outcomes. We investigated the cost-effectiveness of this intervention targeted at one million insufficiently active adults who visit their general practitioner in the Netherlands.Methods: We used the RIVM chronic disease model to estimate the long-term effects of increased physical activity on the future health care costs and quality adjusted life years (QALY) gained, from a health care perspective.Results: The intervention resulted in almost 6000 people shifting to more favorable physical-activity levels, and in 5100 life years and 6100 QALYs gained, at an additional total cost of EUR 67.6 million. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was EUR 13,200 per life year gained and EUR 11,100 per QALY gained. The intervention has a probability of 0.66 to be cost-effective if a QALY gained is valued at the Dutch informal threshold for cost-effectiveness of preventive intervention of EUR 20,000. A sensitivity analysis showed substantial uncertainty of ICER values.Conclusion: Counseling in combination with pedometer use aiming to increase physical activity may be a cost-effective intervention. However, the intervention only yields relatively small health benefits in the Netherlands