How to understand it: Visual hallucinations

Visual hallucinations have intrigued neurologists and physicians for generations due to patients’ vivid and fascinating descriptions. They are most commonly associated with Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies, but also occur in people with visual loss, where they are known as Charles Bonnet syndrome. More rarely, they can develop in other neurological conditions, such as thalamic or midbrain lesions, when they are known as peduncular hallucinosis. This review considers the mechanisms underlying visual hallucinations across diagnoses, including visual loss, network dysfunction across the brain and changes in neurotransmitters. We propose a framework to explain why visual hallucinations occur most commonly in Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies, and discuss treatment approaches to visual hallucinations in these conditions

Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease - What Is It?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mild cognitive impairment is a common feature of Parkinson’s disease, even at the earliest disease stages, but there is variation in the nature and severity of cognitive involvement and in the risk of conversion to Parkinson’s disease dementia. This review aims to summarise current understanding of mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. We consider the presentation, rate of conversion to dementia, underlying pathophysiology and potential biomarkers of mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Finally, we discuss challenges and controversies of mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Large-scale longitudinal studies have shown that cognitive involvement is important and common in Parkinson’s disease and can present early in the disease course. Recent criteria for mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s provide the basis for further study of cognitive decline and for the progression of different cognitive phenotypes and risk of conversion to dementia. SUMMARY: Improved understanding of the underlying pathology and progression of cognitive change are likely to lead to opportunities for early intervention for this important aspect of Parkinson’s disease

Current concepts and controversies in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease dementia and Dementia with Lewy Bodies

Parkinson’s disease dementia (PDD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) are relentlessly progressive neurodegenerative disorders that are likely to represent two ends of a disease spectrum. It is well established that both are characterised pathologically by widespread cortical Lewy body deposition. However, until recently, the pathophysiological mechanisms leading to neuronal damage were not known. It was also not understood why some cells are particularly vulnerable in PDD/DLB, nor why some individuals show more aggressive and rapid dementia than others. Recent studies using animal and cell models as well as human post-mortem analyses have provided important insights into these questions. Here, we review recent developments in the pathophysiology in PDD/DLB. Specifically, we examine the role of pathological proteins other than α-synuclein, consider particular morphological and physiological features that confer vulnerabilities on some neurons rather than others, and finally examine genetic factors that may explain some of the heterogeneity between individuals with PDD/DLB

Visual dysfunction predicts cognitive impairment and white matter degeneration in Parkinson's disease

Visual dysfunction predicts dementia in Parkinsons disease (PD), but whether this translates to structural change is not known. We aimed to identify longitudinal white matter changes in patients with Parkinsons disease and low visual function and also in those who developed mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We used fixel-based analysis to examine longitudinal white matter change in PD. Diffusion MRI and clinical assessments were performed in 77 patients at baseline (22 low visual function /55 intact vision; and 13 MCI, 13 MCI converters /51 normal cognition) and 25 controls and again after 18 months. We compared micro-structural changes in fibre density, macro-structural changes in fibre bundle cross-section (FC) and combined fibre density and cross-section across white matter, adjusting for age, gender and intracranial volume. Patients with Parkinsons and visual dysfunction showed worse cognitive performance at follow up and were more likely to develop MCI compared with those with normal vision (p=0.008). Parkinsons with poor visual function showed diffuse micro-structural and macro-structural changes at baseline, whereas those with MCI showed fewer baseline changes. At follow-up, Parkinsons with low visual function showed widespread macrostructural changes, involving the fronto-occipital fasciculi, external capsules, and middle cerebellar peduncles bilaterally. No longitudinal change was seen in baseline MCI or in MCI converters, even when the two groups were combined. Parkinsons patients with poor visual function show increased white matter damage over time, providing further evidence for visual function as a marker of imminent cognitive decline

Visual dysfunction in Parkinson's disease

Patients with Parkinson's disease have a number of specific visual disturbances. These include changes in colour vision and contrast sensitivity and difficulties with complex visual tasks such as mental rotation and emotion recognition. We review changes in visual function at each stage of visual processing from retinal deficits, including contrast sensitivity and colour vision deficits to higher cortical processing impairments such as object and motion processing and neglect. We consider changes in visual function in patients with common Parkinson's disease-associated genetic mutations including GBA and LRRK2 We discuss the association between visual deficits and clinical features of Parkinson's disease such as rapid eye movement sleep behavioural disorder and the postural instability and gait disorder phenotype. We review the link between abnormal visual function and visual hallucinations, considering current models for mechanisms of visual hallucinations. Finally, we discuss the role of visuo-perceptual testing as a biomarker of disease and predictor of dementia in Parkinson's disease

Hearing and dementia: from ears to brain

The association between hearing impairment and dementia has emerged as a major public health challenge, with significant opportunities for earlier diagnosis, treatment and prevention. However, the nature of this association has not been defined. We hear with our brains, particularly within the complex soundscapes of everyday life: neurodegenerative pathologies target the auditory brain, and are therefore predicted to damage hearing function early and profoundly. Here we present evidence for this proposition, based on structural and functional features of auditory brain organization that confer vulnerability to neurodegeneration, the extensive, reciprocal interplay between ‘peripheral’ and ‘central’ hearing dysfunction, and recently characterized auditory signatures of canonical neurodegenerative dementias (Alzheimer’s disease, Lewy body disease and frontotemporal dementia). Moving beyond any simple dichotomy of ear and brain, we argue for a reappraisal of the role of auditory cognitive dysfunction and the critical coupling of brain to peripheral organs of hearing in the dementias. We call for a clinical assessment of real-world hearing in these diseases that moves beyond pure tone perception to the development of novel auditory ‘cognitive stress tests’ and proximity markers for the early diagnosis of dementia and management strategies that harness retained auditory plasticit

Organisational and neuromodulatory underpinnings of structural-functional connectivity decoupling in patients with Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's dementia is characterised by changes in perception and thought, and preceded by visual dysfunction, making this a useful surrogate for dementia risk. Structural and functional connectivity changes are seen in humans with Parkinson's disease, but the organisational principles are not known. We used resting-state fMRI and diffusion-weighted imaging to examine changes in structural-functional connectivity coupling in patients with Parkinson's disease, and those at risk of dementia. We identified two organisational gradients to structural-functional connectivity decoupling: anterior-to-posterior and unimodal-to-transmodal, with stronger structural-functional connectivity coupling in anterior, unimodal areas and weakened towards posterior, transmodal regions. Next, we related spatial patterns of decoupling to expression of neurotransmitter receptors. We found that dopaminergic and serotonergic transmission relates to decoupling in Parkinson's overall, but instead, serotonergic, cholinergic and noradrenergic transmission relates to decoupling in patients with visual dysfunction. Our findings provide a framework to explain the specific disorders of consciousness in Parkinson's dementia, and the neurotransmitter systems that underlie these

Disrupted reward processing in Parkinson's disease and its relationship with dopamine state and neuropsychiatric syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Neuropsychiatric symptoms are common in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and predict poorer outcomes. Reward processing dysfunction is a candidate mechanism for the development of psychiatric symptoms including depression and impulse control disorders (ICDs). We aimed to determine whether reward processing is impaired in PD and its relationship with neuropsychiatric syndromes and dopamine replacement therapy. // Methods: The Ovid MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase and PsycInfo databases were searched for articles published up to 5 November 2020. Studies reporting reward processing task performance by patients with PD and healthy controls were included. Summary statistics comparing reward processing between groups were converted to standardised mean difference (SMD) scores and meta-analysed using a random effects model. // Results: We identified 55 studies containing 2578 participants (1638 PD and 940 healthy controls). Studies assessing three subcomponent categories of reward processing tasks were included: option valuation (n=12), reinforcement learning (n=37) and reward response vigour (n=6). Across all studies, patients with PD on medication exhibited a small-to-medium impairment versus healthy controls (SMD=0.34; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.53), with greater impairments observed off dopaminergic medication in within-subjects designs (SMD=0.43, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.57). Within-subjects subcomponent analysis revealed impaired processing off medication on option valuation (SMD=0.57, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.75) and reward response vigour (SMD=0.36, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.59) tasks. However, the opposite applied for reinforcement learning, which relative to healthy controls was impaired on-medication (SMD=0.45, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.65) but not off-medication (SMD=0.28, 95% CI −0.03 to 0.59). ICD was the only neuropsychiatric syndrome with sufficient studies (n=13) for meta-analysis, but no significant impairment was identified compared tonon-ICD patients (SMD=−0.02, 95% CI −0.43 to 0.39). // Conclusion: Reward processing disruption in PD differs according to subcomponent and dopamine medication state, and warrants further study as a potential treatment target and mechanism underlying associated neuropsychiatric syndromes

Computer-vision based method for quantifying rising from chair in Parkinson's disease patients

BACKGROUND: The ability to arise from a sitting to a standing position is often impaired in Parkinson's disease (PD). This impairment is associated with an increased risk of falling, and higher risk of dementia. We propose a novel approach to estimate Movement Disorder Society Unified PD Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) ratings for “item 3.9” (arising from chair) using a computer vision-based method, whereby we use clinically informed reasoning to engineer a small number of informative features from high dimensional markerless pose estimation data. METHODS: We analysed 447 videos collected via the KELVIN-PD™ platform, recorded in clinical settings at multiple sites, using commercially available mobile smart devices. Each video showed an examination for item 3.9 of the MDS-UPDRS and had an associated severity rating from a trained clinician on the 5-point scale (0, 1, 2, 3 or 4). The deep learning library OpenPose was used to extract pose estimation key points from each frame of the videos, resulting in time-series signals for each key point. From these signals, features were extracted which capture relevant characteristics of the movement; velocity variation, smoothness, whether the patient used their hands to push themselves up, how stooped the patient was while sitting and how upright the patient was when fully standing. These features were used to train an ordinal classification system (with one class for each of the possible ratings on the UPDRS), based on a series of random forest classifiers. RESULTS: The UPDRS ratings estimated by this system, using leave-one-out cross validation, corresponded exactly to the ratings made by clinicians in 79% of videos, and were within one of those made by clinicians in 100% of cases. The system was able to distinguish normal from Parkinsonian movement with a sensitivity of 62.8% and a specificity of 90.3%. Analysis of misclassified examples highlighted the potential of the system to detect potentially mislabelled data. CONCLUSION: We show that our computer-vision based method can accurately quantify PD patients’ ability to perform the arising from chair action. As far as we are aware this is the first study estimating scores for item 3.9 of the MDS-UPDRS from singular monocular video. This approach can help prevent human error by identifying unusual clinician ratings, and provides promise for such a system being used routinely for clinical assessments, either locally or remotely, with potential for use as stratification and outcome measures in clinical trials