1,465 research outputs found
Revisit assignments of the new excited states with QCD sum rules
In this article, we distinguish the contributions of the positive parity and
negative parity states, study the masses and pole residues of the
1S, 1P, 2S and 2P states with the spin and
using the QCD sum rules in a consistent way, and revisit the
assignments of the new narrow excited states. The predictions
support assigning the to be the 1P state with
, assigning the to be the 1P
state with or the 2S state with
, and assigning to be the 2S
state with .Comment: 19 pages, 22 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with
arXiv:1705.0774
Origin of giant valley splitting in silicon quantum wells induced by superlattice barriers
Enhancing valley splitting in SiGe heterostructures is a crucial task for
developing silicon spin qubits. Complex SiGe heterostructures, sharing a common
feature of four-monolayer (4ML) Ge layer next to the silicon quantum well (QW),
have been computationally designed to have giant valley splitting approaching 9
meV. However, none of them has been fabricated may due to their complexity.
Here, we remarkably simplify the original designed complex SiGe
heterostructures by laying out the Si QW directly on the Ge substrate followed
by capping a (Ge4Si4)n superlattice(SL) barrier with a small sacrifice on VS as
it is reduced from a maximum of 8.7 meV to 5.2 meV. Even the smallest number of
periods (n = 1) will also give a sizable VS of 1.6 meV, which is large enough
for developing stable spin qubits. We also develop an effective Hamiltonian
model to reveal the underlying microscopic physics of enhanced valley splitting
by (Ge4Si4)n SL barriers. We find that the presence of the SL barrier will
reduce the VS instead of enhancing it. Only the (Ge4Si4)n SL barriers with an
extremely strong coupling with Si QW valley states provide a remarkable
enhancement in VS. These findings lay a solid theoretical foundation for the
realization of sufficiently large VS for Si qubits
tert-Butyl 4-formyl-1H-imidazole-1-carboxylÂate
In the crystal structure of the title compound, C9H12N2O3, weak interÂmolecular C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds link the molÂecules into chains. Further weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds together with π–π interÂactions [centroid–centroid distance = 3.672 (4) Å] between neighbouring chains lead to a double-chain structure propagating in [100]
- …