3 research outputs found

    Capturing Patient Value in an Economic Evaluation

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE: Economic evaluations predominantly use generic outcomes, such as EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), to assess the health status. However, because of the generic nature, they are less suitable to capture the quality of life of patients with specific conditions. Given the transition to patient-centered (remote) care delivery, this study aims to evaluate the possibility to use disease-specific measures in a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA).METHODS: A real-life cohort from Maasstad Hospital (2020-2021) in the Netherlands, with 772 Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients, was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of electronic consultations (e-consultations) compared with face-to-face consultations. The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) based on the generic EQ-5D was compared with ICER's based on RA specific measures; Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). To compare the cost-effectiveness of these different measures, HAQ-DI and RAID were expressed in QALYs via estimated conversion equations.CONCLUSIONS: The conventional ICER (e.g. EQ-5D) indicates that e-consultations are cost-effective with cost savings of - €161k per QALY gained for a prevalent RA cohort treated in a secondary trainee hospital. RA specific measures show similar results, with ICER's of - €163k per HAQ-DI(QALY) and - €223k per RAID(QALY) gained. RA specific measures capture patient-relevant domains and offer the opportunity to improve the assessment and treatment of the disease impact.DISCUSSION: Disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) offer a promising alternative for traditional measures in economic evaluations, capturing patient-relevant domains more comprehensively. As PROMs are increasingly applied in clinical practice, the next step entails modelling of a RA patient-wide conversion equation to implement PROMs in economic evaluations. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p

    Multimorbidity status and annual healthcare expenditures of rheumatoid arthritis patients: a Dutch hospital-centered versus population-based comparison

    Get PDF
    The prevalence of multimorbidity among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients is increasing and associated with worse outcomes. Therefore, management of multimorbid patients requires a multidisciplinary approach. However, healthcare systems consist of mono-disciplinary subsystems, which limits collaboration across subsystems. To study the importance of a multidisciplinary, integrated approach, associations between expenditures and multimorbidity are assessed in real-life data. Retrospective data on RA patients from a Dutch single-hospital are analyzed and compared to the Dutch RA population data. The Elixhauser index is used to measure the multimorbidity prevalence. Regression analyses were conducted to derive the relationship between multimorbidity, healthcare costs and self-reported quality of life (e.g. EQ-5D). When analyzing the impact of multimorbidity within RA patients in context of a single-hospital context, multimorbidity is only partially captured: 13% prevalence versus 24% of the Dutch population. Multimorbidity is associated with higher care expenditures. Depending on the type of multimorbidity, expenditures are €43-€5821 higher in a single-hospital and from €2259-€9648 in population data. Finally, medication use associated with chronic diseases and self-reported aspects of well-being are associated with similar increases in healthcare expenditures as multimorbidity based on hospital care. Within RA, a single-hospital approach underestimates the association between multimorbidity and healthcare expenditures as 43% of healthcare utilization and expenditures are missed. To overcome a single-provider perspective in healthcare and efficiently coordinate multimorbid patients, besides providing holistic care, professionals also need to use data providing comprehensive pictures of patients

    Dealing with Time Estimates in Hospital Cost Accounting: Integrating Fuzzy Logic into Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) can support value-based healthcare (VBHC) programs by providing insights into the actual relationships between time spent by the medical staff and the costs associated with specific care cycles. However, the robustness of time estimates (time variation) as well as the effort required to obtain these estimates are major challenges of the TDABC methodology, given the heterogeneity in patients' needs and the presence of (multi)morbidity. To allow for the variation in time estimates in an efficient manner, this study uses fuzzy logic (FL) to estimate the TDABC model parameters (FL-TDABC). METHODS: A standardized care path was used to calculate the annual costs (per patient) and cost drivers of the Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) care cycle following the FL-TDABC methodology. Cost information (2018) was derived from hospital reports concerning financial, human resource and business intelligence data from a Dutch top clinical research hospital, Maasstad Hospital. Time estimates of procedures were obtained by interviewing the medical staff and relevant care activities were extracted from electronic health records. For analytical and validation purposes, FL-TDABC estimates were compared with TDABC and ABC cost estimates. RESULTS: The RA care cycle annual costs totaled €1497 per patient (2018 prices) based on the FL-TDABC methodology. Maximum RA cycle costs (€1684) were some 22% higher than minimum costs (€1317) observed from FL-TDABC. Cost drivers explaining the cost variation are predominantly the number of consultations with rheumatologists and pharmacy costs related to RA. Based on TDABC and ABC, annual costs per patient were €1609 and €1604, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The FL-TDABC methodology offers a more precise and efficient estimate of care cycle costs, allowing for the subjective (fuzzy) nature of healthcare time estimates made by the medical staff. As a result, the FL-TDABC provides insight into the practice variation, and hence it can promote the transition from a volume-based system to a VBHC system
    corecore