Effects of psychosocial factors on monitoring treatment effect in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis patients over time: response data from the tREACH study

Objectives: To investigate whether, apart from effects of patient- and disease-related factors, p

Impact of triage by a rheumatologist on appropriateness of referrals from primary to secondary care: a cluster randomized trial

The quality of referrals is often criticized, and the effectiveness of improvement efforts remains uncertain. We assessed the impact of a rheumatologist triaging patients in primary care on the appropriateness of referrals to secondary care, healthcare utilization, and patient experience and outcomes. A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted with patients experiencing musculoskeletal complaints. Intervention practices deployed an experienced rheumatologist triaging patients through in-person review. Usual care was performed in control practices, where practitioners referred patients based on their own judgement. The primary outcome was the proportion of inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) diagnosed by rheumatologists in referred patients. Healthcare utilization (iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire), quality of life (EuroQol 5 Dimensions), and experience of care (Consumer Quality Index) were determined after 3 months of follow-up. Data were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. In total, 544 participants were included [mean age 51.4 (range 18–87) years; 24% were men]. Of all referred patients, 51% had an IRD in the intervention group versus 21% in the control group (p = 0.035). After 3 months of follow-up, patients from the triage intervention showed lower healthcare utilization (p = 0.006) and higher quality of life (p = 0.011), without a decline in experienced quality of care (p = 0.712), compared to controls. Triage by a rheumatologist in primary care provides appropriate care and adequate experience of care, leading to a higher quality of life. Long-term evidence is needed to assess the value on cost-effectiveness before implementing this strategy nationwide.</p

Combining bone resorption markers and heel quantitative ultrasound to discriminate between fracture cases and controls.

This nested case-control analysis of a Swiss ambulatory cohort of elderly women assessed the discriminatory power of urinary markers of bone resorption and heel quantitative ultrasound for non-vertebral fractures. The tests all discriminated between cases and controls, but combining the two strategies yielded no additional relevant information. INTRODUCTION: Data are limited regarding the combination of bone resorption markers and heel quantitative bone ultrasound (QUS) in the detection of women at risk for fracture. METHODS: In a nested case-control analysis, we studied 368 women (mean age 76.2 +/- 3.2 years), 195 with low-trauma non-vertebral fractures and 173 without, matched for age, BMI, medical center, and follow-up duration, from a prospective study designed to predict fractures. Urinary total pyridinolines (PYD) and deoxypyridinolines (DPD) were measured by high performance liquid chromatography. All women underwent bone evaluations using Achilles+ and Sahara heel QUS. RESULTS: Areas under the receiver operating-characteristic curve (AUC) for discriminative models of the fracture group, with 95% confidence intervals, were 0.62 (0.56-0.68) and 0.59 (0.53-0.65) for PYD and DPD, and 0.64 (0.58-0.69) and 0.65 (0.59-0.71) for Achilles+ and Sahara QUS, respectively. The combination of resorption markers and QUS added no significant discriminatory information to either measurement alone with an AUC of 0.66 (0.60-0.71) for Achilles+ with PYD and 0.68 (0.62-0.73) for Sahara with PYD. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary bone resorption markers and QUS are equally discriminatory between non-vertebral fracture patients and controls. However, the combination of bone resorption markers and QUS is not better than either test used alone