Single versus dual antiplatelet therapy following peripheral arterial endovascular intervention for chronic limb threatening ischaemia:retrospective cohort study

ObjectivesAntiplatelet therapy following peripheral arterial endovascular intervention lacks high quality evidence to guide practice. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of three months of dual antiplatelet therapy on amputation-free survival following peripheral arterial endovascular intervention in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia.MethodsA retrospective review of symptomatic patients undergoing primary peripheral arterial endovascular intervention over a seven-year period was performed. The primary outcome measure was amputation-free survival. A sample size calculation based on previous cohort studies suggested that 629 limbs would be required to show a difference between single and dual therapy. Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariate logistic regression analysis of recorded baseline characteristics was performed to determine predictors of amputation-free survival. Dual antiplatelet therapy was routinely given for 3 months.Results754 limbs were treated with primary angioplasty and/or stenting over a 7-year period, 508 of these for chronic limb threatening ischemia. There was no difference in unadjusted amputation-free survival between patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia taking single vs. dual antiplatelet therapy (69% vs. 74% respectively Log rank Chi2 = 0.1, p = .72). After adjusting for confounders, at 1 year there was also no significant difference in amputation-free survival between patients taking single vs. dual antiplatelet therapy [OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.2, p = .3]. There was no difference in rates of major bleeding between single and dual antiplatelet therapy.ConclusionsThere was no clear evidence of reduced amputation-free survival in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia undergoing peripheral arterial endovascular intervention being treated with dual antiplatelet therapy for 3 months. This is at odds with other retrospective case series and highlights the limitations in basing clinical practice on such data. There is a need for an adequately powered, independent randomised trial to definitively answer the question

Four consecutive yearly point-prevalence studies in Wales indicate lack of improvement in sepsis care on the wards

The ‘Sepsis Six’ bundle was promoted as a deliverable tool outside of the critical care settings, but there is very little data available on the progress and change of sepsis care outside the critical care environment in the UK. Our aim was to compare the yearly prevalence, outcome and the Sepsis Six bundle compliance in patients at risk of mortality from sepsis in non-intensive care environments. Patients with a National Early Warning Score (NEWS) of 3 or above and suspected or proven infection were enrolled into four yearly 24-h point prevalence studies, carried out in fourteen hospitals across Wales from 2016 to 2019. We followed up patients to 30 days between 2016–2019 and to 90 days between 2017 and 2019. Out of the 26,947 patients screened 1651 fulfilled inclusion criteria and were recruited. The full ‘Sepsis Six’ care bundle was completed on 223 (14.0%) occasions, with no significant difference between the years. On 190 (11.5%) occasions none of the bundle elements were completed. There was no significant correlation between bundle element compliance, NEWS or year of study. One hundred and seventy (10.7%) patients were seen by critical care outreach; the ‘Sepsis Six’ bundle was completed significantly more often in this group (54/170, 32.0%) than for patients who were not reviewed by critical care outreach (168/1385, 11.6%; p < 0.0001). Overall survival to 30 days was 81.7% (1349/1651), with a mean survival time of 26.5 days (95% CI 26.1–26.9) with no difference between each year of study. 90-day survival for years 2017–2019 was 74.7% (949/1271), with no difference between the years. In multivariate regression we identified older age, heart failure, recent chemotherapy, higher frailty score and do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation orders as significantly associated with increased 30-day mortality. Our data suggests that despite efforts to increase sepsis awareness within the NHS, there is poor compliance with the sepsis care bundles and no change in the high mortality over the study period. Further research is needed to determine which time-sensitive ward-based interventions can reduce mortality in patients with sepsis and how can these results be embedded to routine clinical practice

Income deprivation and groin wound surgical site infection: cross-sectional analysis from the groin wound infection after vascular exposure multicenter cohort study

Background: Living in deprived areas is associated with poorer outcomes after certain vascular procedures and surgical site infection in other specialties. Our primary objective was to determine whether living in more income-deprived areas was associated with groin wound surgical site infection after arterial intervention. Secondary objectives were to determine whether living in more income-deprived areas was associated with mortality and clinical consequences of surgical site infection. Methods: Postal code data for patients from the United Kingdom who were included in the Groin Wound Infection after Vascular Exposure (GIVE) multicenter cohort study was used to determine income deprivation, based on index of multiple deprivation (IMD) data. Patients were divided into three IMD groups for descriptive analysis. Income deprivation score was integrated into the final multivariable model for predicting surgical site infection. Results: Only patients from England had sufficient postal code data, analysis included 772 groin incisions (624 patients from 22 centers). Surgical site infection occurred in 9.7% incisions (10.3% of patients). Surgical site infection was equivalent between income deprivation tertiles (tertile 1 = 9.5%; tertile 2 = 10.3%; tertile 3 = 8.6%; p = 0.828) as were the clinical consequences of surgical site infection and mortality. Income deprivation was not associated with surgical site infection in multivariable regression analysis (odds ratio [OR], 0.574; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.038–8.747; p = 0.689). Median age at time of procedure was lower for patients living in more income-deprived areas (tertile 1 = 68 years; tertile 2 = 72 years; tertile 3 = 74 years; p < 0.001). Conclusions: We found no association between living in an income-deprived area and groin wound surgical site infection, clinical consequences of surgical site infection and mortality after arterial intervention. Patients living in more income-deprived areas presented for operative intervention at a younger age, with similar rates of comorbidities to patients living in less income-deprived areas. Groin wound surgical site infection (SSI) after arterial surgery is common [1], and research into reducing SSIs in vascular surgery is recognized as a priority by both clinicians and patient/caregiver representatives [2]. Despite the substantial potential morbidity and mortality of these SSIs [3,4], the available evidence relating to contributory factors is largely historic or reliant on retrospective data [5–7]. Further research on the epidemiology of SSI in this patient group is needed to allow better risk stratification, improve pre-operative discussions of risk with patients, and to guide targeted SSI prevention strategies that often include expensive prophylactic interventions [8]. However, little is currently known about the impact of socioeconomic characteristics on groin wound SSIs in this population. Socioeconomic deprivation is linked to health [9], and lifestyle-influenced cardiovascular diseases are more prevalent in more deprived areas [10]. Higher rates of unhealthy lifestyles (smoking, poor diet, and lack of physical exercise) in deprived areas are postulated to cause higher rates of cardiovascular risk increasing comorbidities, such as obesity and hyperlipidemia [10–12]. Several cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., smoking, body mass index, and diabetes mellitus), and peripheral arterial disease itself, are well recognized risk factors for SSI [13–16]. The association between socioeconomic deprivation and SSIs has previously been demonstrated in orthopedic surgery, cardiac surgery, and general surgery [17–19]. It is currently unknown whether living in an income-deprived area is associated with groin wound SSIs after arterial intervention. It was recently demonstrated in a large registry study in the United Kingdom, that outcomes following endovascular intervention for occlusive peripheral arterial disease were worse for patients living in deprived areas [20]. To the best of our knowledge, this aspect of outcomes after arterial intervention through a groin incision has not been investigated. Furthermore, studies demonstrating higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors in more deprived areas are now mostly historic and have not specifically investigated those presenting for arterial intervention through a groin incision for demographic differences in relation to deprivation [9–12]. Updated, prospective evidence is required to determine whether health inequalities persist for such patients today. Our primary objective was to determine whether residing in a more income-deprived area was associated with a higher risk of groin wound SSI after arterial intervention, by analyzing a subset of patients enrolled in the Groin wound Infection after Vascular Exposure (GIVE) multicenter cohort study [1,21]. Secondary objectives were to determine whether living in more income-deprived areas was associated with 30-day mortality and the clinical sequelae of SSI, and whether patients living in more income-deprived areas differed in terms of demographics and comorbidities compared with patients from less income-deprived areas