Spectroscopic investigation of the formation of hypochlorite, radiolysis by-product in 5 M NaCI featuring high-energy proton beam line experiments.

Because geological salt formations are considered possible sites for radioactive waste disposal, plausible inundation scenario of salt repository will allow chloride brines to be formed, which consequently will be exposed to radiation from the waste. Key radioelements in Intermediate Level Waste (ILW),H igh Level Waste (HLW) or TRU waste have been found to be plutonium, americium, neptunium, uranium, and technetium. Therefore, the effect of radiolysis on high-saline brine under simulated repository conditions are of particular importance because it results in oxidizing chlorine-containing species, such as hypochlorite (OC1-), and hypochlorous acid (HOCI), which may oxidize actinide species to higher oxidation states. Meaningful predictions of long-term redox conditions in a nuclear repository strongly rely on estimations of G-values of the irradiation-induced formation of the oxidizers OC1- and HOCI. G-values not only depend on the total absorbed doses over the relevant timeframe, but also on the kind of irradiation involved. In fact, the G-values of hypochlorite produced by {alpha}-, {beta}-, {gamma}-, or neutron irradiation differ by an order of magnitude, depending on different LET cross-sections. To overcome the serious constrains and obstacles of conventional radiochemical work within GBq/L activity levels, we are going to simulate {alpha}-irradiation of chloride brines by the adaptation of beam-line experiments. Our long-term goal is to demonstrate how the main oxidizing chloride species such as hypochlorite caused by radiolysis may affect the overall behavior of actinides under salt repository conditions. This paper describes our first steps towards the production, the identification and the determination of these oxidizing species by beam line experiments

Spectroscopic Investigation of the Formation of Radiolysis by-Products by 13/9 Mev Linear Accelerator of Electrons (LAE) in Salt Solutions.

In the near-field chemistry of a salt repository, the radiolytically-induced redox reactions in concentrated saline solution are of particular importance because the radiolysis of saline solutions results in oxidizing chlorine-containing species, which may oxidize actinide species to higher oxidation states. If the brines are irradiated, the solutions containing radiolytic species such as hypochlorite, hypochlorous acid or hydrogen peroxide, their pH and Eh may be altered. The oxidation and complexation states of actinides, which might be present in the salt brine, will change thus influencing their speciation and consequently their mobility. Furthermore, radiolytically formed oxidizing species such as ClO- or H2O2 may enhance the corrosion of the canister material. Therefore, radiation effects on salt brines must be integrated into the database, which described the chemical processes near a disposal site. Investigations in that context usually focus on the radiation chemistry of solid NaCl however our focus is on the radiolytic products, which are formed when salt brines are irradiated by a 10 MeV linear accelerator of electrons (LAE). We attempt to quantify the irradiation-induced formation of typical radiolysis by-products such as the hypochlorite ion (OCl-) by using a 13/9 MeV LAE with doses between 120 KGy to 216 KGy while monitoring the pH of the brine solution

Evaluating Strategies for Sustainable Intensification of US Agriculture Through the Long-Term Agroecosystem Research Network

Sustainable intensification is an emerging model for agriculture designed to reconcile accelerating global demand for agricultural products with long-term environmental stewardship. Defined here as increasing agricultural production while maintaining or improving environmental quality, sustainable intensification hinges upon decision-making by agricultural producers, consumers, and policy-makers. The Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network was established to inform these decisions. Here we introduce the LTAR Common Experiment, through which scientists and partnering producers in US croplands, rangelands, and pasturelands are conducting 21 independent but coordinated experiments. Each local effort compares the outcomes of a predominant, conventional production system in the region (\u27business as usual\u27) with a system hypothesized to advance sustainable intensification (\u27aspirational\u27). Following the logic of a conceptual model of interactions between agriculture, economics, society, and the environment, we identified commonalities among the 21 experiments in terms of (a) concerns about business-as-usual production, (b) \u27aspirational outcomes\u27 motivating research into alternatives, (c) strategies for achieving the outcomes, (d) practices that support the strategies, and (e) relationships between practice outreach and adoption. Network-wide, concerns about business as usual include the costs of inputs, opportunities lost to uniform management approaches, and vulnerability to accelerating environmental changes. Motivated by environmental, economic, and societal outcomes, scientists and partnering producers are investigating 15 practices in aspirational treatments to sustainably intensify agriculture, from crop diversification to ecological restoration. Collectively, the aspirational treatments reveal four general strategies for sustainable intensification: (1) reducing reliance on inputs through ecological intensification, (2) diversifying management to match land and economic potential, (3) building adaptive capacity to accelerating environmental changes, and (4) managing agricultural landscapes for multiple ecosystem services. Key to understanding the potential of these practices and strategies are informational, economic, and social factors—and trade-offs among them—that limit their adoption. LTAR is evaluating several actions for overcoming these barriers, including finding financial mechanisms to make aspirational production systems more profitable, resolving uncertainties about trade-offs, and building collaborative capacity among agricultural producers, stakeholders, and scientists from a broad range of disciplines