14 research outputs found

    Use of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents in stable outpatients with coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation. International CLARIFY registry

    Get PDF

    The PRNP ins/del

    No full text

    Using the discrete wavelet transform in assessing the effectiveness of rehabilitation in patients after ACL reconstruction

    No full text
    Purpose: The purpose of the current study was to assess the effectiveness of rehabilitation in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a wavelet analysis of the torque-time curve patterns of the extensors of the affected knee. The analysis aimed at the quantitative evaluation of irregularities in these torque-time patterns. Methods: The study involved a group of 22 men who had had ACL reconstruction. The torque-time characteristics were recorded 3, 6 and 12 months after the surgery by an isokinetic dynamometer. They were then examined using the orthogonal Daubechies 4 (Db 4) and biorthogonal Bior 3.1 wavelets. Results: A statistical analysis of the results revealed significant differences in values of the high-frequency energy stored in the details of the signal from the dynamometer between the first and last measurements, both for the Db 4 ( p ≤ 0.023) and Bior 3.1 ( p ≤ 0.01) wavelets. These differences were found in 73% of patients whose curve patterns were analysed using the Db 4 wavelet and in 82% of patients in the case of the Bior 3.1 wavelet. Conclusions: The wavelet transform proved to be an effective research tool in the qualitative evaluation of irregularities occurring in the curve patterns of the torque generated by the extensors of the ACL reconstructed knee. The findings of the study suggest that time-frequency analyses of these characteristics can be of practical importance, as they help assess the state of the patient’s knee joint and his progress in rehabilitation after ACLR

    Early results of one-stage knee extensor realignment and autologous osteochondral grafting

    No full text
    We treated 49 patients with recurrent patellar dislocations or persistent patellar subluxations. Chondral defects were graded according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS). Thirty patients (group I) had chondral defects grade I or II, and 19 patients (group II) had chondral defects grade III or IV. All patients were treated with proximal and distal realignment of the knee extensor mechanism, but group II also had a simultaneous autologous osteochondral grafting of the chondral defect. Patients were followed for 2 years and clinically assessed using the Marshall score comparing the two groups. Apart from a slower recovery in group II, the clinical and functional results were almost the same at the final follow-up

    Rehabilitation after one-stage anterior cruciate reconstruction and osteochondral grafting

    No full text
    At least 10–20% of all ACL reconstructions require additional cartilage repair. The aim of this study was to compare the activity recovered by patients after one-stage open ACL reconstruction and osteochondral autologous grafting of articular cartilage lesions and after isolated open ACL reconstruction. The study group included 21 patients with chronic ACL deficiency and grade III or IV cartilage lesion according to the ICRS scale who were treated with combined ACL reconstruction and osteochondral grafting in one step. The control group included 32 patients with chronic ACL insufficiency and no chondral deficit higher than grade I on the ICRS scale who underwent isolated reconstruction of the ligament. For the assessment, the Lysholm and Gillquist (L&G) score and the functional Marshall score were used. Both groups displayed a statistically significant improvement in the L&G score and the Marshall score between the preoperative and 12-month assessments. The mean gain in L&G score over this period was 30.66±7.79 in the study group and 31.65±6.96 in the control group. The difference between the control group and the study group was not significant. The difference between 12 months and initial assessment was counted. The mean gain in Marshall score was 9.05±3.81 in the study group and 10.71±3.43 in the control group. The difference between the initial and the 12-month evaluation was statistically significant (p=0.49). Return to normal activity was slower and patient satisfaction was lower during the first year after operation in the study group than in the control group, however the overall advantage of the one-step operation outweighs the slightly inferior functional results at 12 months
    corecore