22 research outputs found

    Long-term effects of medical management on growth and weight in individuals with urea cycle disorders

    Get PDF
    Low protein diet and sodium or glycerol phenylbutyrate, two pillars of recommended long-term therapy of individuals with urea cycle disorders (UCDs), involve the risk of iatrogenic growth failure. Limited evidence-based studies hamper our knowledge on the long-term effects of the proposed medical management in individuals with UCDs. We studied the impact of medical management on growth and weight development in 307 individuals longitudinally followed by the Urea Cycle Disorders Consortium (UCDC) and the European registry and network for Intoxication type Metabolic Diseases (E-IMD). Intrauterine growth of all investigated UCDs and postnatal linear growth of asymptomatic individuals remained unaffected. Symptomatic individuals were at risk of progressive growth retardation independent from the underlying disease and the degree of natural protein restriction. Growth impairment was determined by disease severity and associated with reduced or borderline plasma branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) concentrations. Liver transplantation appeared to have a beneficial effect on growth. Weight development remained unaffected both in asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. Progressive growth impairment depends on disease severity and plasma BCAA concentrations, but cannot be predicted by the amount of natural protein intake alone. Future clinical trials are necessary to evaluate whether supplementation with BCAAs might improve growth in UCDs

    Impairment of cognitive function in ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency is global rather than domain‐specific and is associated with disease onset, sex, maximum ammonium, and number of hyperammonemic events

    Full text link
    Beginning in 2006, the Urea Cycle Disorders Consortium (UCDC) has conducted a longitudinal study of eight inherited deficiencies of enzymes and transporters of the urea cycle, including 444 individuals with ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency (OTCD), of whom 300 (67 males, 233 females) received psychological evaluation. In a cross-sectional study (age range, 3-71 years), analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) determined the association between outcomes in five cognitive domains (global intelligence, executive functions, memory, visuomotor integration, visual perception) and sex, age at testing and timing of disease onset defined as early onset (≤28 days; EO), late onset (LO), or asymptomatic (AS). The dataset of 183 subjects with complete datasets (31 males, 152 females) revealed underrepresentation of EO subjects (2 males, 4 females), who were excluded from the ANCOVA. Although mean scores of LO and AS individuals were within 1 SD of the population norm, AS subjects attained significantly higher scores than LO subjects and males higher scores than females. Correlations between cognitive domains were high, particularly intelligence proved to be a distinguished indicator for cognitive functioning. Maximum plasma ammonium concentration and intelligence correlated significantly higher in EO (r = -0.47) than in LO subjects (r = 0.04). Correlation between the number of hyperammonemic events and intelligence scores were similar for EO (r = -0.30) and LO (r = -0.26) individuals. The number of clinical symptoms was significantly associated with intelligence (r = -0.28) but not with scores in other domains. Results suggest that OTCD has a global impact on cognitive functioning rather than a specific effect on distinct cognitive domains

    The BabySeq project: implementing genomic sequencing in newborns

    No full text
    Abstract Background The greatest opportunity for lifelong impact of genomic sequencing is during the newborn period. The “BabySeq Project” is a randomized trial that explores the medical, behavioral, and economic impacts of integrating genomic sequencing into the care of healthy and sick newborns. Methods Families of newborns are enrolled from Boston Children’s Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital nurseries, and half are randomized to receive genomic sequencing and a report that includes monogenic disease variants, recessive carrier variants for childhood onset or actionable disorders, and pharmacogenomic variants. All families participate in a disclosure session, which includes the return of results for those in the sequencing arm. Outcomes are collected through review of medical records and surveys of parents and health care providers and include the rationale for choice of genes and variants to report; what genomic data adds to the medical management of sick and healthy babies; and the medical, behavioral, and economic impacts of integrating genomic sequencing into the care of healthy and sick newborns. Discussion The BabySeq Project will provide empirical data about the risks, benefits and costs of newborn genomic sequencing and will inform policy decisions related to universal genomic screening of newborns. Trial registration The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02422511. Registration date: 10 April 2015

    International clinical guideline for the management of classical galactosemia: diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up

    Get PDF
    Classical galactosemia (CG) is an inborn error of galactose metabolism. Evidence-based guidelines for the treatment and follow-up of CG are currently lacking, and treatment and follow-up have been demonstrated to vary worldwide. To provide patients around the world the same state-of-the-art in care, members of The Galactosemia Network (GalNet) developed an evidence-based and internationally applicable guideline for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of CG. The guideline was developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. A systematic review of the literature was performed, after key questions were formulated during an initial GalNet meeting. The first author and one of the working group experts conducted data-extraction. All experts were involved in data-extraction. Quality of the body of evidence was evaluated and recommendations were formulated. Whenever possible recommendations were evidence-based, if not they were based on expert opinion. Consensus was reached by multiple conference calls, consensus rounds via e-mail and a final consensus meeting. Recommendations addressing diagnosis, dietary treatment, biochemical monitoring, and follow-up of clinical complications were formulated. For all recommendations but one, full consensus was reached. A 93 % consensus was reached on the recommendation addressing age at start of bone density screening. During the development of this guideline, gaps of knowledge were identified in most fields of interest, foremost in the fields of treatment and follow-up
    corecore