Antecolic Versus Retrocolic Route of the Gastroenteric Anastomosis After Pancreatoduodenectomy A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective: To investigate the relationship between the route of gastroenteric (GE) reconstruction after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and the postoperative incidence of delayed gastric emptying (DGE). Background: DGE is one of the most common complications after PD. Recent studies suggest that an antecolic route of the GE reconstruction leads to a lower incidence of DGE, compared to a retrocolic route. In a nonrandomized comparison within our trial center, we found no difference in DGE after antecolic or retrocolic GE reconstruction. Methods: Ten middle- to high-volume centers participated in the patient inclusion. Patients scheduled for PD who gave written informed consent were included and randomized during surgery after resection. Standard operation was a pylorus-preserving PD. Primary endpoint was DGE. Secondary endpoints included other complications and length of hospital stay. Results: There were 125 patients in the retrocolic group, and 121 patients in the antecolic group. Baseline and treatment characteristics did not differ between the study groups. In the retrocolic group, 45 patients (36%) developed clinically relevant DGE compared with 41 (34%) in the antecolic group (absolute risk difference: 2.1%; 95% confidence interval: -9.8% to 14.0%). There were no differences in need for postoperative (par)enteral nutritional support, other complications, hospital mortality, and median length of hospital stay. Conclusions: The route of GE reconstruction after PD does not influence the postoperative incidence of DGE or other complications. The etiology and treatment of DGE, which occurs frequently after both procedures, need further investigation. The GE reconstruction after PD should be routed according to the surgeon's preference

Therapeutic Delay and Survival After Surgery for Cancer of the Pancreatic Head With or Without Preoperative Biliary Drainage

Objective: To evaluate the relation between delay in surgery because of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) and survival in patients scheduled for surgery for pancreatic head cancer. Background: Patients with obstructive jaundice due to pancreatic head cancer can undergo PBD. The associated delay of surgery can lead to more advanced cancer stages at surgical exploration, affecting resection rate and survival. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial to compare PBD with early surgery (ES) for pancreatic head cancer for complications. We obtained Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival for patients with pathology-proven malignancy and compared survival functions of ES and PBD groups using log-rank test statistics. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic role of time to surgery for overall survival. Results: Mean times from randomization to surgery were 1.2 (0.9-1.5) and 5.1 (4.8-5.5) weeks in the ES and PBD groups, respectively (P < 0.001). In the ES group, 60 (67%) of 89 patients underwent resection, versus 53 (58%) of 91 patients in the PBD group (P = 0.20). Median survival after randomization was 12.2 (9.1-15.4) months in the ES group versus 12.7 (8.9-16.6) months in the PBD group (P = 0.91). A longer time to surgery was significantly associated with slightly lower mortality rate after surgery (hazard ratio = 0.90, 95% CI, 0.83-0.97), when taking into account resection, bilirubin, complications, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, tumor-positive lymph nodes, and microscopically residual disease. Conclusions: In patients with pancreatic head cancer, the delay in surgery associated with PBD does not impair or benefit survival rate. (Ann Surg 2010;252:840-849

Effect of time to surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE Achieving surgical resection is essential if patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have a chance for cure. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of time to surgery on resection rates in patients with resectable PDAC. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies reporting times to surgery and resection rates. Meta-regression models were then produced to assess the relationship between time to surgery and resection rates, using both intra- and inter-study comparisons. RESULTS A total of 21 studies were included, comprising n = 2171 patients, with a pooled resection rate of 76%. Intra-study meta-analysis of the five studies that reported comparisons between patients with vs. without preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) or with long vs. short delays to surgery found earlier surgery to be associated with a significantly higher rate of resection (pooled odds ratio 1.93, 95% CI: 1.25-2.97, P = 0.003). Inter-study meta-regression across all studies found a tendency for resection rates to decline with increasing time from CT or ERCP to surgery (gradient - 0.13 log-odds per week, 95% CI - 0.28, 0.03, P = 0.100), although this did not reach statistical significance, in part due to considerable heterogeneity between studies. CONCLUSION Pathways to reduce the time to surgery, primarily by avoiding PBD, demonstrate significantly greater resection rates. Early surgery, including avoidance of PBD, not only provides patients with the benefit of avoiding harm associated with PBD but also with a greater chance of undergoing resection