Performance, Workload, and Stress in Vigilance: The Power of Choice

Observers were provided the illusion of choice by permitting them to \u27choose\u27 an easy or a hard version of a vigilance task. Participants were then assigned at random to either the condition they expressed preference for or their non-preferred condition. Participants in the comparison control condition were not offered the opportunity to choose. Task demand was manipulated using event rate variation, divided into high and low event rates. Results indicated that permitting participants a choice regarding \u27difficulty level\u27 and subsequently assigning them to that level enhanced signal detections but did not reduce their perceived workload and stress. In contrast, offering a choice and then assigning observers to their non-preferred condition impaired performance relative to a condition in which no choice was provided. This pattern of effects was more pronounced at the low compared to the high event rate. These results confirm the importance of motivational effects in vigilance and the impact choice has on performance in tasks requiring sustained attention

Evaluating Vigilance in a Dynamic Environment: Methodological Issues and Proposals

Decades of vigilance research have contributed much to our understanding of the factors affecting sustained attention. However most of what we know about vigilance has been from studies employing tasks that involve relatively static stimuli presented on relatively uncluttered backgrounds. This bears little resemblance to many modern day vigilance tasks. The present study discusses the challenges and issues in applying the vigilance paradigm and methodology to a dynamic task requiring vigilance in an IED detection task. Copyright 2012 by Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Inc. All rights reserved