7 research outputs found
ΠΠ΅Π½Π΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Ρ Π°Π»ΡΠ»Ρ: ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ²ΡΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ»ΡΠ³Π°Ρ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΌΡΡΡΠ»ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ Π² Π Π΅ΡΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Π’Π°ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ°Π½
Using the example of the Republic of Tatarstan (Russia), this article discusses the emergence of the field of medical services for Muslims. It argues that genderisation of social interactions, in particular, of those between physicians and patients, has been one of the main principles of Muslim bioethics in the Republic. Among other measures, halal certification procedures are currently being developed by numerous religious experts in order to standardise and legitimise such genderisation. The analysis draws on data collected during multiple interviews with experts, medical professionals, Muslim patients, as well as on the qualitative study of regulatory documents. The article shows that the main feature of rules that govern certification procedures in Tatarstan today is the ongoing convergence between religious norms and biomedicine. As a particular example of medical services designed explicitly for Muslims in the Republic, the paper presents and analyses the service of βhalal birth-givingβ. This service combines commodification of religiosity and paid care for Muslim women, thereby heavily relying on their gender and religious identities, as well as their class status.ΠΠ°Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Ρ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ»ΡΠ³ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΌΡΡΡΠ»ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π Π΅ΡΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π’Π°ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ°Π½. Π ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ· Π³Π»Π°Π²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² ΠΌΡΡΡΠ»ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΈΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π³Π΅Π½Π΄Π΅ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΉ, Π² ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ. ΠΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΠ· ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ»ΡΠ³ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΌΡΡΡΠ»ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡ. ΠΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΡ ΡΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ-ΠΌΡΡΡΠ»ΡΠΌΠ°Π½Π°ΠΌΠΈ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π΄Π΅Π»Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΅Π³Π»Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ» ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π³ΠΈΠ±ΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Ρ. ΠΠ°ΠΊ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ»ΡΠ³ΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΌΡΡΡΠ»ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π° ΡΡΠ»ΡΠ³Π° Β«Ρ
Π°Π»ΡΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΒ», ΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ°Ρ Π² ΡΠ΅Π±Π΅ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΡΡ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΠΎ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ
-ΠΌΡΡΡΠ»ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΊΠ°Ρ
Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΈΡ
Π³Π΅Π½Π΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ°
Π‘ΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΡ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½-ΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡ Π»ΠΈΠ½Π³Π²ΠΎΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ (Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π Π΅ΡΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π’Π°ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ°Π½)
The article is devoted to the study of linguocultural competences of migrant women from Central
Asia in the Republic of Tatarstan. The analyzed materials were obtained using mass sociological
survey methods, as well as biographical and semi-structured interviews. On the basis of language
skills in Tatar and Russian languages the article studies attitudes of migrant women to the
development of language skills, analyzes different speech situations and reveals the influence of
linguocultural competences on the nature of their social contacts, which ultimately determines the
success of adaptation in the host societyΠ‘ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π»ΠΈΠ½Π³Π²ΠΎΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½-ΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠ·
Π¦Π΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠ·ΠΈΠΈ Π² Π Π΅ΡΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Π’Π°ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ°Π½. ΠΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Ρ
ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ°, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ
ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΡ. ΠΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ Π½Π°Π²ΡΠΊΠΎΠ² Π²Π»Π°Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ
ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½-ΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
Π½Π°Π²ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²,
Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ Π»ΠΈΠ½Π³Π²ΠΎΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΉ Π½Π° Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΠ², ΡΡΠΎ Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²
Π‘ΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΡ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½-ΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡ Π»ΠΈΠ½Π³Π²ΠΎΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ (Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π Π΅ΡΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π’Π°ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ°Π½)
The article is devoted to the study of linguocultural competences of migrant women from Central
Asia in the Republic of Tatarstan. The analyzed materials were obtained using mass sociological
survey methods, as well as biographical and semi-structured interviews. On the basis of language
skills in Tatar and Russian languages the article studies attitudes of migrant women to the
development of language skills, analyzes different speech situations and reveals the influence of
linguocultural competences on the nature of their social contacts, which ultimately determines the
success of adaptation in the host societyΠ‘ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π»ΠΈΠ½Π³Π²ΠΎΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½-ΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠ·
Π¦Π΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠ·ΠΈΠΈ Π² Π Π΅ΡΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Π’Π°ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ°Π½. ΠΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Ρ
ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ°, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ
ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΡ. ΠΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ Π½Π°Π²ΡΠΊΠΎΠ² Π²Π»Π°Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ
ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½-ΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
Π½Π°Π²ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²,
Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ Π»ΠΈΠ½Π³Π²ΠΎΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΉ Π½Π° Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΠ², ΡΡΠΎ Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²
Forum The humanities and social sciences and Covid-19:pros and cons
For the past two years, research groups and universities have been exposed to the novel and unpredictable conditions of life during the viral pandemic, and to the constantly shifting restrictions on normal academic activities that have accompanied it. In particular, personal contactsβbetween teachers and students and between colleaguesβhave to a large extent been difficult or impossible. For some, the social restrictions have been a disaster, while others have found them to be an insignificant nuisance, or even welcome. Participants of the βforumβ discuss how the pandemic has affected their own (work) situation and the situation at their home institution, whether the enforced (self-)isolation has created any new types of working practices or social relations that are desirable to persist in the future, and whether the humanities and social sciences have evolved any new research questions and topics that directly derive from the pandemic, the social restrictions associated with it, and efforts to fight its effects
Forum The humanities and social sciences and Covid-19:pros and cons
For the past two years, research groups and universities have been exposed to the novel and unpredictable conditions of life during the viral pandemic, and to the constantly shifting restrictions on normal academic activities that have accompanied it. In particular, personal contactsβbetween teachers and students and between colleaguesβhave to a large extent been difficult or impossible. For some, the social restrictions have been a disaster, while others have found them to be an insignificant nuisance, or even welcome. Participants of the βforumβ discuss how the pandemic has affected their own (work) situation and the situation at their home institution, whether the enforced (self-)isolation has created any new types of working practices or social relations that are desirable to persist in the future, and whether the humanities and social sciences have evolved any new research questions and topics that directly derive from the pandemic, the social restrictions associated with it, and efforts to fight its effects