15 research outputs found

    Effektivität eines Home-Care Teams und Symptomwahrnehmung in der pädiatrischen Palliativversorgung

    Get PDF

    Diagnostic performance of cardiac magnetic resonance segmental myocardial strain for detecting microvascular obstruction and late gadolinium enhancement in patients presenting after a ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

    Get PDF
    Background Microvascular obstruction (MVO) and Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) assessed in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) are associated with adverse outcome in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Our aim was to analyze the diagnostic performance of segmental strain for the detection of MVO and LGE. Methods Patients with anterior STEMI, who underwent additional CMR were enrolled in this sub-study of the CARE-AMI trial. Using CMR feature tracking (FT) segmental circumferential peak strain (SCS) was measured and the diagnostic performance of SCS to discriminate MVO and LGE was assessed in a derivation and validation cohort. Results Forty-eight STEMI patients (62 ± 12 years old), 39 (81%) males, who underwent CMR (i.e., mean 3.0 ± 1.5 days) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were included. All patients presented with LGE and in 40 (83%) patients, MVO was additionally present. Segments in all patients were visually classified and 146 (19%) segments showed MVO (i.e., LGE+/MVO+), 308 (40%) segments showed LGE and no MVO (i.e., LGE+/MVO-), and 314 (41%) segments showed no LGE (i.e., LGE-). Diagnostic performance of SCS for detecting MVO segments (i.e., LGE+/MVO+ vs. LGE+/MVO-, and LGE-) showed an AUC = 0.764 and SCS cut-off value was -11.2%, resulting in a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 67% with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 30% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94% when tested in the validation group. For LGE segments (i.e., LGE+/MVO+ and LGE+/MVO- vs. LGE-) AUC = 0.848 and SCS with a cut-off value of -13.8% yielded to a sensitivity of 76%, specificity of 74%, PPV of 81%, and NPV of 70%. Conclusion Segmental strain in STEMI patients was associated with good diagnostic performance for detection of MVO+ segments and very good diagnostic performance of LGE+ segments. Segmental strain may be useful as a potential contrast-free surrogate marker to improve early risk stratification in patients after primary PCI

    Long-term outcomes with balloon-expandable and self-expandable prostheses in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND Data on long-term outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is scarce. METHODS We investigated long term outcomes of consecutive patients undergoing TAVI with balloon- and self-expandable bioprostheses (Edwards SAPIEN (ESV), Edwards Lifesciences Inc., Irvine, CA, USA; Medtronic Corevalve system (MCS), Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). RESULTS Among 628 patients (mean age 82.4 ± 5.8 years, 55% female), 489 (77.8%) underwent transfemoral TAVI. 309 (63.2%) patients received a MCS prosthesis, whereas 180 (36.8%) patients were treated with an ESV prosthesis. The median duration of follow-up amounted to 5.2 years (range 3.4-8.3 years). All-cause mortality did not differ between the two groups (MCS 46.9%, ESV 53.4%, CI 95%: RR 1.21 [0.93-1.57], P = 0.15), whereas cardiac mortality was higher in the ESV cohort after 5 years of follow-up (MCS 35.1%, ESV 45.4%, CI 95%: RR 1.37 [1.01-1.86], P = 0.04). Structural valve deterioration, which was on average diagnosed 41.9 months (range 18-60 months) after TAVI, occurred in 8 cases (1.6%), resulting in one repeat intervention. CONCLUSIONS While half of all patients died within 5 years after TAVI with no significant differences in all-cause mortality, structural valve deterioration was documented in <2% of cases

    New-onset arrhythmias following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE To evaluate the prevalence and clinical impact of new-onset arrhythmias in patients following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHOD We systematically identified studies reporting new-onset arrhythmias after TAVI other than atrioventricular conduction disturbances. We summarised monitoring strategies, type and prevalence of arrhythmias and estimated their effect on risk of death or cerebrovascular events by using random-effects meta-analysis. The study is registered withInternational prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42017058053). RESULTS Sixty-five studies (43 506 patients) reported new-onset arrhythmias following TAVI. The method of arrhythmia detection was specified only in 31 studies (48%). New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) (2641 patients), bradyarrhythmias (182 patients), supraventricular arrhythmias (29 patients), ventricular arrhythmias (28 patients) and non-specified major arrhythmias (855 patients) were reported. In most studies (52 out of 65), new-onset arrhythmia detection was limited to the first month following TAVI. The most frequently documented arrhythmia was NOAF with trend of increasing summary prevalence of 11%, 14%, 14% and 25% during inhospital, 30-day, 1-year and 2-year follow-ups, respectively (P for trend=0.011). Summary prevalence estimates of NOAF at 30-day follow-up differ significantly between studies of prospective and retrospective design (8% and 21%, respectively, P=0.002). New episodes of bradyarrhythmias were documented with a summary crude prevalence of 4% at 1-year follow-up. NOAF increased the risk of death (relative risk 1.61, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.98, I2=47%) and cerebrovascular events (1.79, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.64, I2=0%). No study commented on therapeutic modifications following the detection of new-onset arrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS Systematic identification of new-onset arrhythmias following TAVI may have considerable impact on subsequent therapeutic management and long-term prognosis in this patient population

    Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for the Treatment of Pure Native Aortic Valve Regurgitation: A Systematic Review.

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES This study sought to summarize available evidence on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for the treatment of native pure aortic regurgitation (AR). BACKGROUND Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is the gold standard for the treatment of AR. However, case series of high-risk patients undergoing TAVR for native pure AR were reported. METHODS We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and Scopus for reports of at least 5 patients with native pure AR undergoing TAVR. Patients' and procedural characteristics were summarized. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality. Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42016038422). RESULTS Thirteen reports including 237 patients were included in the analysis. Self-expandable prostheses were used in 79% of patients, whereas 21% of the patients were treated with a balloon-expandable valve. Device success ranged between 74% and 100%. Seventeen patients (7%) required the implantation of a second valve. Conversion to SAVR was reported in 6 (2.5%) cases. The rate of all-cause mortality at 30 days amounted to 7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3% to 13%; I(2) = 37%). Cerebrovascular events were rare (0%, 95% CI: 0% to 1%; I(2) = 0); major bleeding and vascular complications occurred in 2% (95% CI: 0% to 7%; I(2) = 41%), and 3% (95% CI: 1% to 7%; I(2) = 0%), respectively. Permanent pacemaker implantation was required in 11% of patients (95% CI: 5% to 19%; I(2) = 50%). The rate of moderate or severe post-procedural AR amounted to 9% (95% CI: 0% to 28%; I(2) = 90%). CONCLUSIONS Among selected patients with native pure AR deemed at high risk for SAVR, TAVR is technically feasible and associated with an acceptable risk of early mortality

    Clinical outcomes in high-risk patients with a severe aortic stenosis: a seven-year follow-up analysis.

    Get PDF
    INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) allocated to medical treatment (MT), transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) through extended follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS Consecutive patients with severe symptomatic AS included in a prospective single centre registry underwent sweep follow-up between March and August 2016. Clinical outcomes were assessed using a competing risk model. A total of 442 patients (median age 83 years; 52% female) were allocated to MT (n = 78), SAVR (n = 107), or TAVR (n = 257) with a gradient of surgical risk as assessed by logistic EuroSCORE (MT: 27.9 &plusmn; 14.5%, TAVR: 24.7 &plusmn; 24.9%, SAVR: 12.5 &plusmn; 8.2%; p &lt;0.001). Survival after a median duration of follow-up of seven years was 6.4% (MT), 30.4% (TAVR), and 46.7% (SAVR), respectively (p &lt;0.001). One TAVR and one SAVR patient underwent repeat intervention for valvular degeneration between 4.5 and 8.4 years after intervention. Compromised left ventricular function (LVEF &lt;40%) was associated with increased mortality (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.22&ndash;2.15; p &lt;0.0001), whereas female sex was protective (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53&ndash;0.88; p = 0.0006). CONCLUSION Both TAVR and SAVR reduced mortality compared to MT throughout a median duration of follow-up of seven years. Repeat interventions for valvular degeneration were rare
    corecore