Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large tumours: Single team experience

Background: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has become the procedure of choice to treat benign functioning and non-functioning adrenal tumours. With improving experience, large adrenal tumours (> 5 cm) are being successfully tackled by laparoscopy. This study aims to present our single unit experience of LA performed for large adrenal masses. Materials and Methods: Forty-six laparoscopic adrenalectomies performed for large adrenal lesions more than 5 cm during the period 2001 to 2010 were reviewed. Results: A total of 46 adrenalectomies were done in 42 patients. The mean tumour size was 7.03 cm (5-15 cm). Fourteen patients had tumour size more than 8 cm. The lesions were localised on the right side in 17 patients and on the left side in 21 patients with bilateral tumours in 4 patients. Functioning tumours were present in 32 of the 46 patients. The average blood loss was 112 ml (range 20-400 ml) with the mean operating time being 144 min (range 45 to 270 min). Five patients required conversion to open procedure. Three of the 46 patients (6.52%) on final histology had malignant tumours. Conclusion: LA is safe and feasible for large adrenal lesions. Mere size should not be considered as a contraindication to laparoscopic approach in large adrenal masses. Graded approach, good preoperative assessment, team work and adherence to anatomical and surgical principles are the key to success

Large abdominoscrotal hydrocele: Uncommon surgical entity

Introduction: An abdominoscrotal hydrocele (ASH) consists of a large inguinoscrotal hydrocele which communicates in an hour glass fashion with a large “intraabdominal component”. Mostly affects single testis but very rarely can present bilaterally. Presentation of case: We are presenting here a young 25 year old patient with large right sided scrotal swelling encroaching over lower abdomen. Clinically it was abdominoscrotal hydrocele which was confirmed with CT abdomen and later on subjected for surgery. Discussion: Abdominoscrotal hydrocele is rarest type of hydrocele; first described by Dupuytren. The etiology of ASH is unknown; however, different theories have been described in literature to explain the pathogenesis. Diagnosis of ASH is done by clinical examination and is confirmed by radiological examination. Though ultrasonography is the first choice, in few selected cases contrast enhanced computerized tomography or magnetic resonant imaging may be helpful for more anatomical delineation. It may present with various complications secondary to pressure exerted by the components of the ASH. Surgical excision of the sac is the only definitive treatment option. There is no role of conservative treatment. Sometimes, decompression of the cyst needed to ease the dissection of the sac. Conclusion: Abdominoscrotal hydrocele differential should be considered while dealing with large lower abdominal swelling along with scrotal swelling