Recent insights into the formation of RAG-induced chromosomal translocations

Chromosomal translocations are found in many types of tumors, where they may be either a cause or a result of malignant transformation. In lymphoid neoplasms, however, it is dear that pathogenesis is initiated by any of a number of recurrent DNA rearrangements. These particular translocations typically place an oncogene under the regulatory control of an Ig or TCR gene promoter, dysregulating cell growth, differentiation, or apoptosis. Given that physiological DNA rearrangements (V(D)J and class switch recombination) are integral to lymphocyte development, it is critical to understand how genomic stability is maintained during these processes. Recent advances in our understanding of DNA damage signaling and repair have provided clues to the kinds of mechanisms that lead to V(D)J-mediated translocations. In turn, investigations into the regulation of V(D)J joining have illuminated a formerly obscure pathway of DNA repair known as alternative NHEJ, which is error-prone and frequently involved in translocations. In this chapter we consider recent advances in our understanding of the functions of the RAG proteins, RAG interactions with DNA repair pathways, damage signaling and chromosome biology, all of which shed light on how mistakes at different stages of V(D)J recombination might lead to leukemias and lymphomas

A recombinase diversified: new functions of the RAG proteins

The RAG proteins were long thought to serve merely as a nuclease, initiating recombination by cleaving DNA. Recent work has shown, however, that these proteins are essential for many steps in the recombination pathway, such as opening hairpins and joining broken DNA ends, and that they can also act as a transposase, targeting distorted DNA structures such as hairpins. The VDJ recombinase is turning out to have an unexpectedly large repertoire of functions, including DNA cleavage, hairpin opening, end joining, and transposition. This review highlights these new developments

B cell development leads off with a base hit: dU:dG mismatches in class switching and hypermutation

The mechanisms underlying somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class switch recombination (CSR) have been the subject of much debate. Recent studies from the Neuberger and Honjo labs have lent insight into these distinct processes, and we discuss a new, comprehensive model for how AID, uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG) and the mismatch repair system function in both SHM and CSR

The V(D)J Recombinase Efficiently Cleaves and Transposes Signal Joints

V(D)J recombination generates two types of products: coding joints, which constitute the rearranged variable regions of antigen receptor genes, and signal joints, which often form on immunologically irrelevant, excised circular molecules that are lost during cell division. It has been widely believed that signal joints simply convert reactive broken DNA ends into safe, inert products. Yet two curious in vivo observations made us question this assumption: signal ends are far more abundant than coding ends, and signal joints form only after RAG expression is downregulated. In fact, we find that signal joints are not at all inert; they are cleaved quite efficiently in vivo and in vitro by a nick-nick mechanism and form an excellent substrate for RAG-mediated transposition in vitro, possibly explaining how genomic stability in lymphocytes may be compromised

Rag mutations reveal robust alternative end joining

Mammalian cells repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) through either homologous recombination or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). V(D)J recombination, a cut-and-paste mechanism for generating diversity in antigen receptors, relies on NHEJ for repairing DSBs introduced by the Rag1-Rag2 protein complex. Animals lacking any of the seven known NHEJ factors are therefore immunodeficient. Nevertheless, DSB repair is not eliminated entirely in these animals: evidence of a third mechanism, 'alternative NHEJ', appears in the form of extremely rare V(D)J junctions and a higher rate of chromosomal translocations. The paucity of these V(D)J events has suggested that alternative NHEJ contributes little to a cell's overall repair capacity, being operative only (and inefficiently) when classical NHEJ fails. Here we find that removing certain portions of murine Rag proteins reveals robust alternative NHEJ activity in NHEJ-deficient cells and some alternative joining activity even in wild-type cells. We propose a two-tier model in which the Rag proteins collaborate with NHEJ factors to preserve genomic integrity during V(D)J recombination