Atrial fibrillation begets ventricular fibrillation when the AV node fails

Deterioration of atrial fibrillation into ventricular fibrillation has frequently been described in patients with pre-excitation of the ventricles. We report two cases of atrial fibrillation without pre-excitation leading to rapid ventricular tachycardias and recurrent implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in young idiopathic ventricular fibrillation patients

Comparing adolescent- and adult-onset unexplained cardiac arrest:Results from the Dutch Idiopathic VF Registry

Background: Current cohorts of patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) primarily include adult-onset patients. Underlying causes of sudden cardiac arrest vary with age; therefore, underlying causes and disease course may differ for adolescent-onset vs adult-onset patients. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare adolescent-onset with adult-onset patients having an initially unexplained cause of VF. Methods: The study included 39 patients with an index event aged ≤19 years (adolescent-onset) and 417 adult-onset patients from the Dutch Idiopathic VF Registry. Data on event circumstances, clinical characteristics, change in diagnosis, and arrhythmia recurrences were collected and compared between the 2 groups. Results: In total, 42 patients received an underlying diagnosis during follow-up (median 7 [2–12] years), with similar yields (15% adolescent-onset vs 9% adult-onset; P = .16). Among the remaining unexplained patients, adolescent-onset patients (n = 33) had their index event at a median age of 17 [16–18] years, and 72% were male. The youngest patient was aged 13 years. In comparison with adults (n = 381), adolescent-onset patients more often had their index event during exercise (P &lt;.01). Adolescent-onset patients experienced more appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy during follow-up compared with adults (44% vs 26%; P = .03). Inappropriate ICD therapy (26% vs 17%; P = .19), ICD complications (19% vs 14%; P = .41), and deaths (3% vs 4%; P = 1) did not significantly differ between adolescent-onset and adult-onset patients. Conclusion: IVF may occur during adolescence. Adolescent-onset patients more often present during exercise compared with adults. Furthermore, they are more vulnerable to ventricular arrhythmias as reflected by a higher incidence of appropriate ICD therapy.</p

The Dutch Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation Registry: progress report on the quest to identify the unidentifiable

Background: Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (iVF) is a rare cause of sudden cardiac arrest and, by definition, a diagnosis of exclusion. Due to the rarity of the disease, previous and current studies are limited by their retrospective design and small patient numbers. Even though the incidence of iVF has declined owing to the identification of new disease entities, an important subgroup of patients remains. Aim: To expand the existing Dutch iVF Registry into a large nationwide cohort of patients initially diagnosed with iVF, to reveal the underlying cause of iVF in these patients, and to improve arrhythmia management. Methods: The Dutch iVF Registry includes sudden cardiac arrest survivors with an initial diagnosis of iVF. Clinical data and outcomes are collected. Outcomes include subsequent detection of a diagnosis other than ‘idiopathic’, arrhythmia recurrence and death. Non-invasive electrocardiographic imaging is used to investigate electropathological substrates and triggers of VF. Results: To date, 432 patients have been included in the registry (median age at event 40 years (interquartile range 28–52)), 61% male. During a median follow-up of 6 (2–12) years, 38 patients (9%) received a diagnosis other than ‘idiopathic’. Eleven iVF patients were characterised with electrocardiographic imaging. Conclusion: The Dutch iVF Registry is currently the largest of its kind worldwide. In this heterogeneous population of index patients, we aim to identify common functional denominators associated with iVF. With the implementation of non-invasive electrocardiographic imaging and other diagnostic modalities (e.g. echocardiographic deformation, cardiac magnetic resonance), we advance the possibilities to reveal pro-fibrillatory substrates

Outcomes in Dutch DPP6 risk haplotype for familial idiopathic ventricular fibrillation:a focused update

Background: The genetic risk haplotype DPP6 has been linked to familial idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF), but the associated long-term outcomes are unknown. Methods: DPP6 risk haplotype-positive family members (DPP6 cases) and their risk haplotype-negative relatives (DPP6 controls) were included. Clinical follow-up data were collected through March 2023. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) indication was divided in primary or secondary prevention. Cumulative survival and event rates were calculated. Results: We included 327 DPP6 cases and 315 DPP6 controls. Median follow-up time was 9 years (interquartile range: 4–12). Of the DPP6 cases, 129 (39%) reached the composite endpoint of appropriate ICD shock, sudden cardiac arrest or death, at a median age of 45 years (range: 15–97). Median overall survival was 83 years and 87 years for DPP6 cases and DPP6 controls, respectively (p &lt; 0.001). In DPP6 cases, median overall survival was shorter for males (74 years) than females (85 years) (p &lt; 0.001). Of the DPP6 cases, 97 (30%) died, at a median age of 50 years. With a prophylactic ICD implantation advise based on risk haplotype, sex and age, 137 (42%) of DPP6 cases received an ICD, for primary prevention (n = 109) or secondary prevention (n = 28). In the primary prevention subgroup, 10 patients experienced a total of 34 appropriate ICD shocks, and there were no deaths during follow-up. DPP6 cases with a secondary prevention ICD experienced a total of 231 appropriate ICD shocks.Conclusion: Patients with the DPP6 risk haplotype, particularly males, are at an increased risk of IVF and sudden cardiac death. Using a risk stratification approach based on risk haplotype, sex and age, a substantial proportion of patients with a primary prevention ICD experienced appropriate ICD shocks, showing the benefit of prophylactic ICD implantation with this strategy.</p

The genetic basis of apparently idiopathic ventricular fibrillation:A retrospective overview

Aims: During the diagnostic work-up of patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (VF), next-generation sequencing panels can be considered to identify genotypes associated with arrhythmias. However, consensus for gene panel testing is still lacking, and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are often identified. The aim of this study was to evaluate genetic testing and its results in idiopathic VF patients. Methods and results: We investigated 419 patients with available medical records from the Dutch Idiopathic VF Registry. Genetic testing was performed in 379 (91%) patients [median age at event 39 years (27-51), 60% male]. Single-gene testing was performed in 87 patients (23%) and was initiated more often in patients with idiopathic VF before 2010. Panel testing was performed in 292 patients (77%). The majority of causal (likely) pathogenic variants (LP/P, n = 56, 15%) entailed the DPP6 risk haplotype (n = 39, 70%). Moreover, 10 LP/P variants were found in cardiomyopathy genes (FLNC, MYL2, MYH7, PLN (two), TTN (four), RBM20), and 7 LP/P variants were identified in genes associated with cardiac arrhythmias (KCNQ1, SCN5A (2), RYR2 (four)). For eight patients (2%), identification of an LP/P variant resulted in a change of diagnosis. In 113 patients (30%), a VUS was identified. Broad panel testing resulted in a higher incidence of VUS in comparison to single-gene testing (38% vs. 3%, P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: Almost all patients from the registry underwent, albeit not broad, genetic testing. The genetic yield of causal LP/P variants in idiopathic VF patients is 5%, increasing to 15% when including DPP6. In specific cases, the LP/P variant is the underlying diagnosis. A gene panel specifically for idiopathic VF patients is proposed.</p

The genetic basis of apparently idiopathic ventricular fibrillation:A retrospective overview

Aims: During the diagnostic work-up of patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (VF), next-generation sequencing panels can be considered to identify genotypes associated with arrhythmias. However, consensus for gene panel testing is still lacking, and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are often identified. The aim of this study was to evaluate genetic testing and its results in idiopathic VF patients. Methods and results: We investigated 419 patients with available medical records from the Dutch Idiopathic VF Registry. Genetic testing was performed in 379 (91%) patients [median age at event 39 years (27-51), 60% male]. Single-gene testing was performed in 87 patients (23%) and was initiated more often in patients with idiopathic VF before 2010. Panel testing was performed in 292 patients (77%). The majority of causal (likely) pathogenic variants (LP/P, n = 56, 15%) entailed the DPP6 risk haplotype (n = 39, 70%). Moreover, 10 LP/P variants were found in cardiomyopathy genes (FLNC, MYL2, MYH7, PLN (two), TTN (four), RBM20), and 7 LP/P variants were identified in genes associated with cardiac arrhythmias (KCNQ1, SCN5A (2), RYR2 (four)). For eight patients (2%), identification of an LP/P variant resulted in a change of diagnosis. In 113 patients (30%), a VUS was identified. Broad panel testing resulted in a higher incidence of VUS in comparison to single-gene testing (38% vs. 3%, P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: Almost all patients from the registry underwent, albeit not broad, genetic testing. The genetic yield of causal LP/P variants in idiopathic VF patients is 5%, increasing to 15% when including DPP6. In specific cases, the LP/P variant is the underlying diagnosis. A gene panel specifically for idiopathic VF patients is proposed.</p

Comparing adolescent- and adult-onset unexplained cardiac arrest: Results from the Dutch Idiopathic VF Registry

Background: Current cohorts of patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) primarily include adult-onset patients. Underlying causes of sudden cardiac arrest vary with age; therefore, underlying causes and disease course may differ for adolescent-onset vs adult-onset patients. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare adolescent-onset with adult-onset patients having an initially unexplained cause of VF. Methods: The study included 39 patients with an index event aged ≤19 years (adolescent-onset) and 417 adult-onset patients from the Dutch Idiopathic VF Registry. Data on event circumstances, clinical characteristics, change in diagnosis, and arrhythmia recurrences were collected and compared between the 2 groups. Results: In total, 42 patients received an underlying diagnosis during follow-up (median 7 [2–12] years), with similar yields (15% adolescent-onset vs 9% adult-onset; P =.16). Among the remaining unexplained patients, adolescent-onset patients (n = 33) had their index event at a median age of 17 [16–18] years, and 72% were male. The youngest patient was aged 13 years. In comparison with adults (n = 381), adolescent-onset patients more often had their index event during exercise (P <.01). Adolescent-onset patients experienced more appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy during follow-up compared with adults (44% vs 26%; P =.03). Inappropriate ICD therapy (26% vs 17%; P =.19), ICD complications (19% vs 14%; P =.41), and deaths (3% vs 4%; P = 1) did not significantly differ between adolescent-onset and adult-onset patients. Conclusion: IVF may occur during adolescence. Adolescent-onset patients more often present during exercise compared with adults. Furthermore, they are more vulnerable to ventricular arrhythmias as reflected by a higher incidence of appropriate ICD therapy

The Genetic Basis of Apparently Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation - a Retrospective Overview

Aims: During the diagnostic work-up of patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (VF), next-generation sequencing panels can be considered to identify genotypes associated with arrhythmias. However, consensus for gene panel testing is still lacking, and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are often identified. The aim of this study was to evaluate genetic testing and its results in idiopathic VF patients. Methods and results: We investigated 419 patients with available medical records from the Dutch Idiopathic VF Registry. Genetic testing was performed in 379 (91%) patients [median age at event 39 years (27-51), 60% male]. Single-gene testing was performed in 87 patients (23%) and was initiated more often in patients with idiopathic VF before 2010. Panel testing was performed in 292 patients (77%). The majority of causal (likely) pathogenic variants (LP/P, n = 56, 15%) entailed the DPP6 risk haplotype (n = 39, 70%). Moreover, 10 LP/P variants were found in cardiomyopathy genes (FLNC, MYL2, MYH7, PLN (two), TTN (four), RBM20), and 7 LP/P variants were identified in genes associated with cardiac arrhythmias (KCNQ1, SCN5A (2), RYR2 (four)). For eight patients (2%), identification of an LP/P variant resulted in a change of diagnosis. In 113 patients (30%), a VUS was identified. Broad panel testing resulted in a higher incidence of VUS in comparison to single-gene testing (38% vs. 3%, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Almost all patients from the registry underwent, albeit not broad, genetic testing. The genetic yield of causal LP/P variants in idiopathic VF patients is 5%, increasing to 15% when including DPP6. In specific cases, the LP/P variant is the underlying diagnosis. A gene panel specifically for idiopathic VF patients is proposed

Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK

Background: A safe and efficacious vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), if deployed with high coverage, could contribute to the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine in a pooled interim analysis of four trials. Methods: This analysis includes data from four ongoing blinded, randomised, controlled trials done across the UK, Brazil, and South Africa. Participants aged 18 years and older were randomly assigned (1:1) to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine or control (meningococcal group A, C, W, and Y conjugate vaccine or saline). Participants in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group received two doses containing 5 × 1010 viral particles (standard dose; SD/SD cohort); a subset in the UK trial received a half dose as their first dose (low dose) and a standard dose as their second dose (LD/SD cohort). The primary efficacy analysis included symptomatic COVID-19 in seronegative participants with a nucleic acid amplification test-positive swab more than 14 days after a second dose of vaccine. Participants were analysed according to treatment received, with data cutoff on Nov 4, 2020. Vaccine efficacy was calculated as 1 - relative risk derived from a robust Poisson regression model adjusted for age. Studies are registered at ISRCTN89951424 and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04324606, NCT04400838, and NCT04444674. Findings: Between April 23 and Nov 4, 2020, 23 848 participants were enrolled and 11 636 participants (7548 in the UK, 4088 in Brazil) were included in the interim primary efficacy analysis. In participants who received two standard doses, vaccine efficacy was 62·1% (95% CI 41·0–75·7; 27 [0·6%] of 4440 in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group vs71 [1·6%] of 4455 in the control group) and in participants who received a low dose followed by a standard dose, efficacy was 90·0% (67·4–97·0; three [0·2%] of 1367 vs 30 [2·2%] of 1374; pinteraction=0·010). Overall vaccine efficacy across both groups was 70·4% (95·8% CI 54·8–80·6; 30 [0·5%] of 5807 vs 101 [1·7%] of 5829). From 21 days after the first dose, there were ten cases hospitalised for COVID-19, all in the control arm; two were classified as severe COVID-19, including one death. There were 74 341 person-months of safety follow-up (median 3·4 months, IQR 1·3–4·8): 175 severe adverse events occurred in 168 participants, 84 events in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group and 91 in the control group. Three events were classified as possibly related to a vaccine: one in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group, one in the control group, and one in a participant who remains masked to group allocation. Interpretation: ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 has an acceptable safety profile and has been found to be efficacious against symptomatic COVID-19 in this interim analysis of ongoing clinical trials. Funding: UK Research and Innovation, National Institutes for Health Research (NIHR), Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation, Lemann Foundation, Rede D’Or, Brava and Telles Foundation, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Thames Valley and South Midland's NIHR Clinical Research Network, and AstraZeneca