Heterogeneous validity of daily data on symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis recorded by patients using the e-diary AllergyMonitor®

Background: Patient-generated symptom and medication scores are essential for diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). Previous studies have shown solid consistencies between different scores at population level in real-life data and trials. For clinicians, the evaluation of individual data quality over time is essential to decide whether to rely on these data in clinical decision-making. Objective: To analyze the consistency of different symptom (SS) and symptom medication scores (SMSs) at individual level in two study cohorts with different characteristics and explore individual patient trajectories over time. Methods: Within the pilot phase of the @IT.2020 project on diagnostic synergy of mobile health and molecular IgE assessment in patients with SAR, we analyzed data of 101 children and 93 adults with SAR and instructed them to record their symptoms and medication intake daily via the mobile app AllergyMonitor®. We then assessed the correlation between different SMS and a visual analogue scale (VAS) on the impact of allergy symptoms on daily life at population and individual level. Results: At population level, the Rhinoconjunctivitis total symptom score (RTSS) correlated better with VAS than the combined symptom and medication score (CSMS). At individual level, consistency among RTSS and VAS was highly heterogeneous and unrelated to disease severity or adherence to recording. Similar heterogeneity was observed for CSMS and VAS. Conclusions: The correlation of clinical information provided by different disease severity scores based on data collected via electronic diaries (e-diaries), is sufficient at population level, but broadly heterogeneous for individual patients. Consistency of the recorded data must be examined for each patient before remotely collected information is used for clinical decision making

A new molecular multiplex IgE assay for the diagnosis of pollen allergy in Mediterranean countries: A validation study

The identification of the primary sensitizing pollen is difficult in Southern European patients with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) if sensitized to various pollen sources with overlapping seasonality. A more precise diagnosis is obtained by IgE assays to allergen molecules, currently available as singleplex or microarrays

@IT2020: An innovative algorithm for allergen immunotherapy prescription in seasonal allergic rhinitis

Background Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (SAR). Its efficacy depends on the precise identification of the triggering allergen. However, diagnostics based on retrospective clinical history and sensitization to whole extracts (SWE) often leads to equivocal results.Objectives To assess the usability and impact of a recently established algorithm for a clinical decision support system (@IT2020-CDSS) for SAR and its diagnostic steps [anamnesis, SWE (skin prick test or serum IgE), component resolved diagnosis, CRD, and real-time digital symptom recording, eDiary] on doctor's AIT prescription decisions.Methods After educational training on the @IT2020-CDSS algorithm, 46 doctors (18 allergy specialists, AS, and 28 general practitioners, GP) expressed their hypothetical AIT prescription for 10 clinical index cases. Decisions were recorded repeatedly based on different steps of the algorithm. The usability and perceived impact of the algorithm were evaluated.Results The combined use of CRD and an eDiary increased the hypothetical AIT prescriptions, both among AS and GP (p < .01). AIT prescription for pollen and Alternaria allergy based on anamnesis and SWE was heterogeneous but converged towards a consensus by integrating CRD and eDiary information. Doctors considered the algorithm useful and recognized its potential in enhancing traditional diagnostics.Conclusions and clinical implications The implementation of CRD and eDiary in the @IT2020-CDSS algorithm improved consensus on AIT prescription for SAR among AS and GP. The potential usefulness of a CDSS for aetiological diagnosis of SAR and AIT prescription in real-world clinical practice deserves further investigation

Regional HIV Surveillance in Italy: a starting point for the future national system

BACKGROUND: the Italian National HIV Surveillance, instituted by the Ministerial Decree of March 31st, 2008, is based on 21 regional surveillance systems and adopts an essential data collection form with a definite data flow. The unification of HIV and AIDS surveillance systems and the implementation of an identical data collection form are priorities of the Italian National HIV/AIDS Action Plan 2017 (PNAIDS). OBJECTIVES: to describe the 21 regional HIV surveillance systems and to verify the feasibility of their unification. METHODS: in March 2017, a questionnaire containing 13 questions was sent to all the regional representatives of the 21 surveillance systems. The main questions were about timeliness, data flow, and quality of the system. The quality was measured through a subjective evaluation expressed by the regional referent through scores from 1 (minimum) to 10 (maximum) regarding four indicators (regional coverage, timeliness, correctness, and completeness of the data). RESULTS: more than half of the regional systems use a computerized data collection method. Some of these regions have not completely adapted to the data collection form contained in the Decree and other regions declare a undernotification of the system. The majority of the regions record a slight notification delay by the reporting centres. Some regions report gaps in the completeness of the data received by the reporting centres. CONCLUSIONS: the main strengths of the HIV surveillance system are computerization of the systems and slightly reporting delay. Regarding the quality of the regional systems and its data, the study reports a good self-evaluation. This study also showed useful indications to improve the national HIV surveillance system, such as the unification of HIV surveillance with the AIDS surveillance and the implementation of a unique national system, as suggested by guidelines of the PNAIDS 2017