Multidimensional analysis using sensor arrays with deep learning for high-precision and high-accuracy diagnosis

In the upcoming years, artificial intelligence (AI) is going to transform the practice of medicine in most of its specialties. Deep learning can help achieve better and earlier problem detection, while reducing errors on diagnosis. By feeding a deep neural network (DNN) with the data from a low-cost and low-accuracy sensor array, we demonstrate that it becomes possible to significantly improve the measurements' precision and accuracy. The data collection is done with an array composed of 32 temperature sensors, including 16 analog and 16 digital sensors. All sensors have accuracies between 0.5-2.0$^\circ$C. 800 vectors are extracted, covering a range from to 30 to 45$^\circ$C. In order to improve the temperature readings, we use machine learning to perform a linear regression analysis through a DNN. In an attempt to minimize the model's complexity in order to eventually run inferences locally, the network with the best results involves only three layers using the hyperbolic tangent activation function and the Adam Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) optimizer. The model is trained with a randomly-selected dataset using 640 vectors (80% of the data) and tested with 160 vectors (20%). Using the mean squared error as a loss function between the data and the model's prediction, we achieve a loss of only 1.47x10$^{-4}$ on the training set and 1.22x10$^{-4}$ on the test set. As such, we believe this appealing approach offers a new pathway towards significantly better datasets using readily-available ultra low-cost sensors.Comment: Corrected typ

Heart rate measurement using the built-in triaxial accelerometer from a commercial digital writing device

Wearable devices are on the rise. Smart watches and phones, fitness trackers or smart textiles now provide unprecedented access to our own personal data. As such, wearable devices can enable health monitoring without disrupting our daily routines. In clinical settings, electrocardiograms (ECGs) and photoplethysmographies (PPGs) are used to monitor the heart's and respiratory behaviors. In more practical settings, accelerometers can be used to estimate the heartrate when they are attached to the chest. They can also help filter out some noise in ECG signal from movement. In this work, we compare the heart rate data extracted from the built-in accelerometer of a commercial smart pen equipped with sensors (STABILO's DigiPen), with a standard ECG monitor readouts. We demonstrate that it is possible to accurately predict the heart rate from the smart pencil. The data collection is done with eight volunteers, writing the alphabet continuously for five minutes. The signal is processed with a Butterworth filter to cut off noise. We achieve a mean-squared error (MSE) better than 6.685x10$^{-3}$ comparing the DigiPen's computed ${\Delta}$t (time between pulses) with the reference ECG data. The peaks' timestamps for both signals all maintain a correlation higher than 0.99. All computed heart rates from the pen accurately correlate with the reference ECG signals