Fish life history dynamics: Shifts in prey size structure evoke shifts in predator maturation traits

A bioenergetics framework is developed to predict optimal life history responses to environmentally driven changes in the rate of energy production by a predator. This framework is used to predict the responses of age at maturation, size at maturation and asymptotic size to changes in the predator/prey size ratio. Predators feeding on relatively smaller prey (i.e., having larger predator/prey size ratios) have lower growth efficiency and are predicted as a consequence to mature earlier, at smaller sizes and reach smaller asymptotic sizes. This prediction was tested using a 78 year time series (1936-2013) of data from a natural population of Lake Trout (Salvelinus namaycush) in Lake Opeongo, Algonquin Park, Ontario, Canada. A large decrease in the predator/prey size ratio for this population occurred over the period 1950-65 when a preferred prey (Cisco: Coregonus artedii) was introduced to the lake. This decrease was followed by ~ 20 years of constancy in the size ratio and then 25 years of progressive increase. Lake trout life history responded plastically during both periods and consistently with our predictions. Extensive analysis of available data provided little empirical support for alternative explanations for the observed changes in Lake Trout size and maturity (e.g. changes in Cisco and/or Lake Trout density and harvest rates). The framework developed here derives plastic life history changes from fixed developmental thresholds that are based on the scaling of net production with body size, and can be used to predict the shape of maturation reaction norms for the major shifts in community structure that are compactly summarized by changes in size spectrum parameters.The accepted manuscript in pdf format is listed with the files at the bottom of this page. The presentation of the authors' names and (or) special characters in the title of the manuscript may differ slightly between what is listed on this page and what is listed in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript; that in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript is what was submitted by the author