Hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Both catheter and surgical ablation strategies offer effective treatments of atrial fibrillation (AF). The hybrid (joint surgical and catheter) ablation for AF is an emerging rhythm control strategy. We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of hybrid ablation of AF. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis interrogating PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from January 1, 1991, to November 30, 2017, using the following search terms: “Cox-maze,” “mini-maze,” “ablation methods (including radiofrequency, cryoablation, cryomaze),” and “surgery.” Included studies required ablation procedures to be hybrid and report rhythm follow-up. Results: We included 925 patients with AF (38% persistent, 51% longstanding persistent) from 22 single-center studies (mean follow-up of 19 months). The surgical lesion set consisted of pulmonary vein isolation (n = 11) or box lesion (n = 11) with variable additional linear ablation. This was followed by sequential (n = 9), staged (n = 9), or combination (n = 4) catheter-based ablation to ensure isolation of pulmonary veins and to facilitate additional ablation or consolidation of surgically ablated lines. Overall, sinus rhythm maintenance was 79.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72.4-85.7] and 70.7% (95% CI, 62.2-78.7) with and without antiarrhythmic drugs, respectively at 19 ± 25 (range, 6-128) months. The use of the bipolar AtriCure Synergy system and left atrial appendage exclusion conferred superior rhythm outcome without antiarrhythmic drugs (P ≤ .01). The overall complication rate was 6.5% (95% CI, 3.4-10.2): mortality 0.2% (95% CI, 0-0.9); stroke 0.3% (95% CI, 0-1.1); reoperation for bleeding 1.6% (95% CI, 0.6-3.0); permanent pacing ~0% (95% CI, 0-0.5); conversion to sternotomy 0.3% (95% CI, 0-1.1); atrioesophageal fistula ~0% (95% CI, 0-0.5); and phrenic nerve injury 0.3% (95% CI, 0-1.1). Conclusions: Hybrid ablation therapy for AF demonstrates favorable rhythm outcome with acceptable complication rates.Jason A. Varzaly, Dennis H. Lau, Darius Chapman, James Edwards, Michael Worthington, and Prashanthan Sander

Contact force and ablation assessment of surgical bipolar radiofrequency clamps in the treatment of atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES: Atrial fibrillation is treated surgically by creating conduction block lesions. Radiofrequency (RF) lesions have reduced efficacy compared to ‘cut-and-sew’. Catheter ablation studies demonstrate a relationship between lesion depth and contact force. We hypothesized that contact force and lesion depth are dependent on design of the bipolar surgical RF clamps. METHODS: Hinged and parallel jaw style RF clamps were studied. Muscle samples were clamped with pressure-sensitive film at increasing tissue thicknesses. Films were analysed determining clamp pressure profiles. A sheep model was utilized for ablation testing using each clamp style until the device indicated transmurality. Separate muscle areas had 1, 2 or 3 burns applied. The muscle was excised, sectioned every 1 cm and stained for lesion depth and fat thickness analysis. RESULTS: Pressure profiling comparing the proximal and distal segments of each clamp style demonstrated only one statistically significant difference in the parallel clamp; the hinged clamp had statistically significant differences (P ≤ 0.03) for all tissue thicknesses. There was no evidence for differences in the proximal lesion depth of both clamps (P = 0.13) but deeper distally in the parallel clamp (10.17 mm vs 8.02 mm, P = 0.003). The logistic regression analysis demonstrated increased odds of transmurality with parallel clamps at 1, 2 or 3 burns (P = 0.03, P = 0.003 and P = 0.002). Every 1 mm increase in overlying fat decreased likelihood of transmurality by 11% (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The parallel and hinged clamps have different pressure profiles with higher likelihood of transmurality using the parallel clamp. Fat reduces the ability of RF to deliver a transmural lesion. These findings have implications for optimal surgical RF ablation technique.Jason A Varzaly, Darius Chapman, Dennis H Lau, Suzanne Edwards, Jennie Louise, James Edwards, Rajiv Mahajan, Michael Worthington, Prashanthan Sander